this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
259 points (96.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

12926 readers
2039 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

jeep dude with the frame-perfect brake slam

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

And then the NOPE! outta there

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think their entering the road “caused” the accident. The other driver was definitely going way too fast and their “evasive maneauver” aas whatever the fuck that was but the Jeep was fully in their lane when it all happened. Likely they thought they had time until it turned out that the other car was going mach 1, and then it instead of hoofing it out of the way they hit the brakes(it’s not a stop everything button).

Speculation, but I’d hardly call stopping in the other car’s lane “frame perfect”.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On a side note: I wonder what the cost of all the bike-related crashes (caused by bikes) would add up.

A crash like the one in the video likely cost someone (insurance company, tax payers, other drivers, etc.) way more than hundreds of cyclist-caused crashes.

I'd be willing to bet that the administrative costs to have cycling insurance would likely be more than the insurance is worth.

Whereas with car insurance, you'd never be able to pay for the true cost of all the damage, lives lost, etc. That's why they cap liability to usually max $2,000,000.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I feel like most bike related crashes (not involving cars) are damage to the individual and not to property. Maybe to their bike, or minor damage elsewhere. If that's the case I would imagine medical insurance would be enough. I guess there are some really fancy bikes you might want to insure but you're right it's prob not worth the admin cost for even a 2 or 3k bike.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly. You don't hear about bikes crashing through buildings and store fronts. Or knocking down road signs. Or power lines. Or bus stop shelters.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, apart from medical costs, the worst a cyclist can do is maybe smash a window of a parked car. The maximum amount of property damage is maybe a few 1000. Nothing that an average person can't pay off within a reasonable time frame.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm willing to bet that most cyclists crashes cost the cyclist more (i.e. to fix/replace their own bike) than the damage they caused to other things. LOL

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

And that likely holds true even if the bike in question is the crappiest old piece of trash.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I put it higher up, but the cost to insure my USD2k bike is $25 per year. That covers theft, accident damage, liability, I keep it as theft insurance and very sure its worth it.

Insurance is gambling, and the house always wins, right? 24 of that $25 is probably theft insurance, the chance of injuring someone else on the ebike is not zero but so low it's immaterial.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mienshao@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Am I the only one who regularly can’t see posts in this instance? It says media failed to load, and I feel like that constantly happens in fuckcars.

[–] remon@ani.social 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it's the "catbox.moe" hosting site that is the issue. At least for me.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

(also if you’re using Quad9 DNS – Quad9 and Catbox have an long running beef with each other)

[–] remon@ani.social 8 points 1 week ago

That might actually explain it! Thanks!

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I can only see videos if I’m in the comment section. They never load if I click on it directly. On voyager on iPhone.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Loads for me on Connect app

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Things like this make me terrified to ride a bike on the street with nothing but a painted line between me and tons of speeding metal.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

if it's not safe to bike, it's not safe to walk

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Insurance for my ebike is $25 per year, insurance on my car is over $3,000 per year. This is honestly one area where the economics make sense, the price does reflect the decreased risk of harming others.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

You have liability insurance on your ebike? Are you certain it's not just theft?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why is insurance not mandatory for cyclists?

Per the PPACA, health insurance is mandatory. This just isn't particular to cyclists because cycling isn't materially more dangerous than any other non-vehicular mode of transportation.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's insurance for oneself.

Mandatory car insurance for drivers is liability insurance for everyone else. The driver is perfectly free not to insure their own vehicle (or their own injuries caused by their own driving).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

In the town I lived we used to know a light pole that you could give a firm kick to cut off all the exterior lighting in the area.

Yeah the masses are different, but personal injuries can still happen.

But I think that should be covered by regular health insurance, you shouldn't need a traffic insurance just for bicycling.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

It is in at least parts of Japan (if not all of it now)

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Asshole in the jeep couldn't be bothered to stop and check on the people

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

They should have stopped because they witnessed an accident, and were probably more than somewhat at fault.

Going to help when power lines are struck are a great way to increase casualties or create fatalities. Approaching from a safe distance and keeping them in the car is the safest thing to do until responders can get there.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

You are assuming what they did after the clip ends. If it was me I would GTFO away from the falling power lines and stop a block away so to not impede traffic or emergency services. The guy could have called right out of frame.

With loose power lines? No thanks.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

You don't know if he did a u-turn mid block and came back. He had to at least get out of the travel lane on the main road.

load more comments
view more: next ›