this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
468 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24989 readers
2371 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Marjorie Taylor Greene explained just how much demands to release the Epstein files have increased.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 123 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Here are all of the Epstein Files that have either been leaked or released.

https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0-combined.pdf (verified court documents)

https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/black-book-unredacted.pdf (verified pre-Bondi) Trump is on page 85, or pdf pg. 80

Trump’s name is circled. The circled individuals are the ones involved in the trafficking ring according to the person who originally released the book. These people would be “The List “ Here is the story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsiKUXrlcac

Here's the flight logs https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21165424-epstein-flight-logs-released-in-usa-vs-maxwell/

—————————other Epstein Information

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Calif_Lawsuit.pdf here’s a court doc of Epstein and Trump raping a 13 yr old together.

Some people think this claim is a hoax. Here is Katies testimony on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo

Epstein’s Ex Says He Boasted About Being a Mossad Agent https://share.google/jLMGahKlCzfV1RHZq Epstein and Israel both hired lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who says he's building 'legal dream team' to defend Israel in court and on internationally | The Times of Israel https://share.google/Lb9hDOduBWG4Elpid

Epstein Docs: https://ia600705.us.archive.org/21/items/epsteindocs/

Epstein Bribes/Payments: 1 BILLION+ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7IrEi-ybzs

—————————other Trump information:

Here's trump admitting to peeping on 14-15 year old girls at around 1:40 on the Howard Stern Radio Show: https://youtu.be/iFaQL_kv_QY

Trump's promise to his daughter: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-ivanka-trump-dating-promise_n_57ee98cbe4b024a52d2ead02 “I have a deal with her. She’s 17 and doing great ― Ivanka. She made me promise, swear to her that I would never date a girl younger than her,” Trump said. “So as she grows older, the field is getting very limited.”

Trump's modeling agency was probably part of Jeffreys pipeline: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/08/donald-trump-model-management-illegal-immigration/

A good summary of Trump-Epstein timeline: https://thepresidential.medium.com/we-have-been-gaslit-about-donald-trump-and-jeffrey-epstein-for-four-years-fbda67c20f75

• ⁠Much of this info can also be found on: https://theepsteindocs.com/

Feel free to do your part and spread this info around so it is never “lost”.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago

“I have a deal with her. She’s 17 and doing great ― Ivanka. She made me promise, swear to her that I would never date a girl younger than her,” Trump said. “So as she grows older, the field is getting very limited.”

Did he ever promise not to rape a girl younger than her? Because that might be an important loophole.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

Bill Barr had Epstein killed.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 39 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just one dissenting Republican vote would have swung it, Collins and Murkowski.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago

They only vote against GOP bills that are going to pass anyway and for Dem bills that are going to fail anyway.

On all other matters, they follow the party line and at most pretend to be conflicted about it.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That was a House vote. They're in the Senate.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 3 days ago

Replace with any name, Dem or Rep

[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So, the Epstein files may provide glimpses into even more fun things, I think. Like Pentagon and Federal Reserve and CIA stuff. Call me a nut (I am one), but I think Trump, the getting ready to die easy target, is being thrown under the bus. This list may be the juiciest thing in a century. Just my cookoo conspiracy theories.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you're very likely correct. My money is on Mar-A-Lago acting as an actual front for international child trafficking under the guise of beauty peagants and adoption through Russian mob agencies. All of which is actually well documented already (I'm not joking.

But a smoking gun in those files of Epstein admitting the Trump owned Miss teen USA pageants were a front for his kidde sex trafficking would be a definite game over.

[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Also, Epstein's girls come from a legacy of Soviet child-prostitution.

Edit: Guys. I just went and checked out r/conservative. They're finally with us on this one. They're either checking out or screaming about money and power as loud as we do.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Just give them time. There's always a bit of a delay before they get their talking points.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You really lost me at "MTG explains..."

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

She tried to warn us about the gazpacho space lasers. But we wouldn't listen.

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Guess what all of you sheep republicans…. It’s never gonna happen. Your favorite leader has betrayed you and used you to get in office and it worked. All of this time, you guys thought it was democrats that were sheep. Well baaa baaa mother fuckers

[–] tylerkdurdan@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

when you rise to power through conspiracy theories...your base is partly, perhaps even largely, comprised of conspiracy theorists. I find it interesting to consider the possibility that controlling conspiracy theorists may have limits and we may be seeing those limits at present.

[–] VivianRixia@piefed.social 18 points 3 days ago

The problem is that the base was raised on the very conspiracy theory that they are guilty of. The call was coming from inside the house.

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Dozens of them! Dozens!

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

GOP voters should all stay home and self-immolate.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Yet another headline that I am disappointed to find is a metaphor....

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Time to break out your best impression of your worst neighbors. Give them the impression you have a business and donations on the line.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 3 days ago

yeah, my emails and calls to the republican that cruelly rules my district now just use a lot of allcaps and shouting