Behavior rules:
Posting rules:
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
Yeah, I know leftists hate crypto but this shit legit is making me want some.
I know crypto sucks in a lot of functional ways but those issues can probably be sorted out eventually. I don't want to let puritanical authoritarian dipshits dictate what I can buy with my fucking money, or even see if they start also fuck with hosting of free content as well.
I don't even buy porn games, doesn't matter. Its the principle of the thing. And this shit can easily get worse if we let them.
Do leftists universally hate crypto?
While I personally think the current cryptocurrencies out there are a bit shit (transaction fees and times on Bitcoin make it pretty useless as a currency), and I do think there is value in governments having control over a currency, I don't necessarily think currency itself is a left-right issue.
I guess unless you're the type of communist who doesn't want any currency at all (which personally, I'm not for, since I'd like people to be able to choose what they spend money on, to some degree, and work extra if they want to, to some degree, and currency fills that use case quite nicely)
Not sure why crypto-currency, as a concept, is necessarily conflicted with leftist ideals (as a nebulous group who don't agree on many things).
Crypto without capitalists is pretty cool
Yeah, crypto as an "investment asset" is a load of steaming hot shit that feeds environmental collapse.
Trustable decentralised finance? That's rad as hell.
I mean not as rad as mutual aid and battering but why let perfection be the enemy of the good?
It can help with mutual aid. People with savings can more easily strike, and support others who are striking. Activists shouldn't have their accounts frozen, and donating to them should be anonymous.
Everything improves when you get rid of capitalism.
Crypto without capitalism would still be dictated by market economy though and a lot of anti-capitalists are anti-currency or anti-market. Not just anti-private-property anti-absentee-ownership.
But yes, I agree. A mutualist (or a "Libertarian" Market Socialist economy) would be pretty cool.
Yeah which is basically the idea of
previously known as the Pan-European Payments System Initiative (PEPSI)
Lmao
Here's the issue: How do you put money into crypto or take it out? A payment processor is how.
Crypto mostly just reinvents the same things. Its also usually not actually anonymous, as has been proved many times.
Some cryptocoins explicitly address privacy and anonymity issues, for example Monero (XMR).
And not even truly de-centralized, as most services that support it actually do it through a few centralized third parties instead of implementing it directly.
Also, in the US at least, every single transaction needs to be reported on your tax return. There are tools to help you do this, but goddamn! imagine compiling all of that each year if you used it regularly. I used it at one point and it was such a pain in the ass come tax season, that I just sold all my crypto the following year and never touched it again.
I traded it in person when I was just testing it out and didn't want any accounts. In theory if things get even more cyberpunk, we could use dead drops.
Good luck paying on Steam using dead drops.
Look, supporting game creators is really important to me.
The problem is not so much "paying for stuff without payment processors". On an individual level, that can fairly easily be achieved.
The problem is the chilling effect that the puritanical positions of these payment processors have on the creation of art. What are you going to do with your crypto if the game or art you wanted to buy gets self-censored for "compliance" or simply isn't created anymore?
That's already happening for the sake of gaining access to console markets. I find it depressing TBH. However, I think its arguably worth trying to at least put a dent into the issue in any way possible.
Agreed on both counts, but I'm not very hopeful.
The older I get, the more puritan the world seems to get, like we're regressing.
Personally, I hate crypto, but I like the idea of crypto. Like decentralized currency, useable anywhere by anyone, independent of locale/government, is an awesome ideal. What drives me away from it is the fact that it’s not reliable (it fluctuates all over the place, and there’s no guarantee what you have one day will be there tomorrow), it eats more power than a country just to track transactions, there’s tons of different ones, and it’s generally used for scams and illicit purchases. Which I suppose is part of its reason it be, but no legit storefront I use takes it.. probably for the first reason.
It also doesn’t help that it’s got a bad rap from all the crazy crypto-bro/fly-by-night scams and NFT stuff.
independent of locale/government, is an awesome ideal.
it’s got a bad rap from all the crazy crypto-bro/fly-by-night scams
One is an inevitable consequence of the other.
The problem has been solved to some extent, at least. Unregulated casinos and Polymarket are entirely banned in the US, but citizens here regularly bypass it with VPNs and transferring stablecoin. In the case of obscene games, it's not illegal (yet at least) so the only thing needed would be the infrastructure for accepting and distributing crypto payments.
None of it is without flaws, but many small websites managed to make it work without issues. The main issue would probably be convincing enough people to move to crypto to create a stable user base. I'd imagine some would be "driven" enough to jump through all these hoops though. Personally I'd like to see a platform that is free of this anti-democratic fuckery going on.
Payment processors should have no authority whatsoever to monitor or police the transactions they facilitate. This would be true even if these two companies weren’t an illegal trust. Between the two of them, they effectively have a global monopoly on digital commerce.
I fully admit in advance I know very little about crypto, so please someone correct me if I’m wrong.
Isn’t part of crypto a detailed log of transactions?
Monero obfuscates transactions. Parties and amount are private.
It depends on the project. Many cryptocurrencies (Like Bitcoin, Etherium, Litecoin) have a public ledger. So every transaction (participants + amount) is visible.
Other Projects (where Monero is the most well known) use special cryptographic systems to hide all that. So the only thing which can be observed by 3th parties is that some transaction was successful somewhere.
There are also projects which are private but prioritize efficiency (all the cryptographic hiding has a notable computation-cost) by sacrificing hidden amount or hidden participants.
Crypts currencies like Monero even hide that
this has been around for decades and it's funny people are only just picking up on it now due to videogames.
I used to work in the adult entertainment industry way back in the early 00s as a web developer and yeah visa and mc's rules were stupid. like an actual list of rules. no fisting was a major one. 4 fingers? fine. slip in a thumb? yup visa and mc can dig it. ball your hand into a fist? THAT'S TOO FAR FOR VISA AND MASTERCARD!
I worked for a self publishing company long, long ago. It turns out, most of our best selling authors made NSFW stuff. Eventually our payment processor complained. So our CFO called around to a bunch of big porn companies and asked them which payment processors they used. Those companies were fine.
A guide book to female domination. Some sissy stuff with mature cover art. Right next to history books and Earthbound fan art. I felt good about it. Serving a real need.
A shame we never got Chuck.
I'm wondering if this is Visa and MasterCard covering their arses legally.
When you buy on credit card you get extra protections like chargebacks and section 75 so if a company goes bust or doesn't do what you paid then for then the credit card company gives you your money back and the company owes them money rather than you.
But is that a double edged sword so if you buy something technically illegal where you live (and there's a lot of odd local porn laws), then they're somehow on the hook for that too?
I suspect a lot of stores are just pulling what is probably a tiny percent of their revenue because they don't have a good way to prevent you buying just that on CC or working out which territory it's legal in, under threat of having all their credit card charging facilities taken away...
fisting
covering their arses
hehe
I'm laughing, man. Made my day
They did the same to the BetaMax format, back in the day, so we all got stuck with the shittier VHS format. Fuck these assholes.
Collective Shout is responsible for this shit for those of you wondering. They're an Australian alt-right group who harass people for porn, LGBT stuff, and whatnot.
It took just over a thousand of these shitheads badgering these companies to make this happen.
Didn't they get that really fun single dev Indy game "Schedule 1" blocked in Australia because you make and sell drugs?
Also shout out to the dev, very fun game! Hope they get the game unblocked.
Let’s start a new payment processor. How high could the barrier to entry be. =\
May I suggest adopting Brazil's pix system, which has been the latest target of these companies and the reason why Trump is now trying to bully the country? Would be quite funny if Visa ended up losing even more ground to the very same system it is trying to sabotage.
Crypto could fix this
So, I just wanted to play a VN, which has 0 porn in it, 0 nudity, 0 gore, and less sexual appeal than an average B rated christmas themed romantic comedy. It portrays negative feelings, and shows depression, and plays with deadth and suicide. This game is targeted for adults, it is not suitable for children, and it is now shadow banned.
Many many games like this has no platform, hardcore porn games has alternative platforms, normal games for kids has platforms, but games with actual meaningful deep content, which are targeted for adults are not.
I don't care if someone wants to jerk off to a fictional character. I don't care if someone wants to see fictional characters abused. They can and will find it on the internet, or god forbid us, if they manage to ban all, they will find it in real life. Its a hard topic if it is moral, or it better or worse to the overall population if these contents are existing, and widely available. It makes it harder that censoreship, freespeech and the oldnew "protect the children" argument is brought into the conversation.
Censorship is not inherently bad (EG a lemmy moderator basically a censorship enforcer)
"Protect the children" is, in my opinion is the responsibility of their guardian. Parental controll is so easy to set up nowadays. I don't think this is the job of the goverment. And fictional children are not real, they do not exist. I find it personally disgusting to portray harm to fictional children, but they are not real to be protected, protect the real ones, we have many abused, trafficed, or even starved to death.
So I accidentaly put too many words into my fustration, that I cannot play the adult targeted game I wanted, because some alt-right femminist from the other side of the globe are scared of pixelart nipples...
I mean..
I'll take Monero, BTC, weed, mushrooms, LSD (contingent on test), cocaine (contingent on test, and resale value), 9mm JHP, 5.56x45mm, gold, silver, platinum, ca$h money, €uros, or glock/ar parts or comic books (contingent on approval).