this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
65 points (88.2% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1929 readers
135 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (26 children)

No politician is owed votes for anything

Every election politicians need to offer things that they will then do when elected in order to attract voters.

When they don't do the things they say they will do, that makes them a liar.

It's amazing how many people fail to understand that when a party loses an election, it's the fault of the party and nobody else.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

"Harm reduction" apparently includes selling billions in weapons to israel while they carry out genocide and shutting down campus protests speaking out against that genocide. Seems pretty fascist to me.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 14 points 6 days ago (3 children)

This sounds more like someone with a grudge against America than a fascist. "Eat shit, Americans" isn't exactly a controversial position in most of the world, for what I hope are obvious reasons.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (3 children)

"I'm glad the fascists won so minorities in America can suffer" is a pretty fascist statement to make. Imagine saying "I'm glad Putin won the election, I hope liberasts and Russians suffer"

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Which I could easily see coming from a Chechen so you're kinda proving my point. Also while minorities are going to suffer more, everyone suffers under fascism except subservient rich males of the right ethnicity, so there's plenty of suffering to go around for, say, Zionists and imperialists. They're misguided, but this comment alone doesn't make them a fascist.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I took it more as "these people who benefitted by all the destruction and war the US committed in their names are finally feeling the sting and might actually be driven to do something about it".

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Which I could easily see coming from a Chechen so you’re kinda proving my point.

... is your point that supporting fascism is okay if you really hate a country?

Also while minorities are going to suffer more, everyone suffers under fascism except subservient rich males of the right ethnicity, so there’s plenty of suffering to go around for, say, Zionists and imperialists.

That's fucking insane reasoning.

They’re misguided, but this comment alone doesn’t make them a fascist.

So if, say, an American liberal said, "I'm glad Egypt is under a strongman regime so Egyptians can suffer", you would regard that as a... non fascist statement??

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago (5 children)

... is your point that supporting fascism is okay if you really hate a country?

Supporting fascism is one thing, thinking one group of people deserves it for something they did is another. It's a misguided version of thinking Nazis did a good job with rocket technology.

you would regard that as a... non fascist statement??

I mean, yes? I'd also hate their guts, but no there's nothing inherently fascist about that statement. And while it'd be really weird coming from an American, I wouldn't be able to object too hard to it coming from a Palestinian, because we do bear responsibility for not standing up to our Zionist stooges.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I'm not agreeing with it, but to translate its more along the lines of "You Americans have spent so long being comfortable and benefitting from the imperialist project of the US and all the death and destruction it perpetrates across the world and have not offered any resistance to their own government in all this time. Liberals have been content to be complaicent in it too as long as a woman gets to drop some of those bombs, for fairness. Now you won't be able to avoid the consequences of the evil imperialist core that all these other countries have been crushed under for over a century and may actually be driven to do something about it, since it actually affects you now."

Which again I don't agree with, but can also aknowledge that its more nuanced than just wishing harm for harm's sake.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"I hope there is a genocide in the US" usually is a controversial position. So is killing all political opponents.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm Canadian and I don't want Americans to suffer. But the US has shitty politicians in power that force me between making a choice between people in my own country eating shit or the US eating shit, and the choice is obvious.

The far left and far right are using the same tactics, just different targets for their hate politics.

Hopefully Americans see through the bullshit of the radicals (both left and right) that make them hate certain people in their own country and people in certain other countries (again, the targets vary but the tactics are the same). But it seems there's not much anyone outside of the US can do until that happens.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Is this far-left hate politics in the room with us right now?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

... man, we're in MeanwhileonGrad, where such luminary views are on display as "Ukronazis deserve to be murdered, critical support for Russian imperialism!"

You can say that they aren't really leftists - and I'm not entirely inclined to disagree - but there's a definite self-identified leftist element of legitimate insane hate that goes around.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Yes, but more often "far-left hate" is a dog whistle for anti-Zionism, because tankies just aren't such a major political phenomenon as to warrant a mention along with the far-right. Also the person I replied to is a known Zionist, so I'm not inclined to interpret their statement charitably.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Ah, I didn't realize they were a Zionist.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Dear Tankies

My life matters too much to be pointlessly sacrificed so we can throw the election by voting for Jill Stein

Sincerely, a transwoman not in a blue state.

If you're in a swing state, sure, vote strategically. But if you're not, voting for a third party has a lot higher chance of sending a useful signal to the dominant party.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

I do feel it would be better if they voted 3rd party tho. We know more about those throw away votes than we do of the non-voting group. Gives the big tent party some solid statistics on how to pivot to get them on board for a coalition. It might also mean that we get more 3rd party election wins on local stuff. Tho I think that last part matters more in blue states. As someone who cannot quite move out if their red state I get what you are saying too. My last congress vote had a standard corporate democrat vs a MTG clone.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Sincerely, a transwoman not in a blue state.

All my trans siblings have my sympathy in this fucking shit-ass time we live in, but especially those not in blue states. I hope you make it out - whether out of the state, or out of this period of fucked up time we live in.

Both, I suppose.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I actually think the lesson is (from listening to lefties, tankies and to dems after the election):

If your strategy relies on votes from the 1% fringes, then you're probably going to lose. If you can't convince normies to vote for you, you're lost.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Both are necessary, is the issue. The normies aren't politically active enough to reliably push a majority of the vote, and the fringe is (by definition) not large enough to do it itself.

You end up with 45% normies and 5.1% fringes, and losing even a little sliver of either means you lose.

Politics in this country is fucked.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But the fringes are fickle, that's what I'm saying, if they are decisive, they will disappoint you. There is a long list of demands that you'll never be able to meet or if you do, you're potentially going to anger the right-wing of your voters and lose more than you get.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yep. But then the fringes are always decisive, and there's no way around that - so every election we end up playing a game of "Holy fucking shit are we going to get screwed again??" and, as Kamala demonstrated in attempting to appeal to a greater volume of normies with her "Country over party" schtick, there's not really a lot of room for replacing the fringe with normies. The normies are mostly already decided or tuned-out, and trying to pump their votes up gives diminishing returns for the effort at this point - at the expense of the fringes.

Shit's fucked. To unfuck it, we have to address the root causes. But addressing the root causes is hard, unglamorous, and time-consuming, while people - normies and fringe alike - want solutions NOW, so instead nothing is fucking done.

load more comments
view more: next ›