this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
280 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24800 readers
2394 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This has TurboTax written all over it.

[–] Manalith@midwest.social 13 points 22 hours ago

Intuit, don't let the whole organization hide, QuickBooks sucks too.

[–] Asafum 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If they actually do this there needs to be a nation wide denial of tax payments. People should just straight up not pay in large enough numbers that they can't prosecute everyone.

I know it will never happen and we'll just be mandatory piggy banks for Intuit, but it's nice to dream...

God I hate this country.

[–] Booboofinget@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

The threat of the IRS coming to take what little you have is just too great. It's too bad they are not as aggressive with billionaires and multi-million dollar companies.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there needs to be a nation wide denial of tax payments

Nearly 10% Of S&P 500 Companies Paid No Tax in 2023 — Including Tesla

Way ahead of you!

People should just straight up not pay in large enough numbers that they can’t prosecute everyone.

For the vast majority of salary earners, taxes are collected at the point of wage payment. You fill out a W-2 when you are hired and your employer sets aside a percentage of your income based on your anticipated tax debt. This often results in over payment, at which point taxpayers file returns to recoup the balance.

For instances in which a taxpayer owes on their return and fails to pay the balance, the IRS can simply order the employer to zero-out exemptions on the W-2 and recoup the excess due over time plus a penalty. Alternatively, they can file with the courts to garnish wages in excess of the W-2, put liens on property, and seize unprotected assets.

This is incredibly easy for the professional legal and prosecutorial team at the IRS. It is comparatively much harder to resist by individuals - even in large numbers - without comparable legal firepower. Your employer is almost certainly not going to assist in tax avoidance, as that exposes the company to legal liability.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can absolutely fill out your W2 to have no withholdings taken out of your check. I know people who do this and put the money in a high yield savings or investment account.

[–] cowfodder@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can, and when you don't pay your taxes the IRS will garnish your paycheck for the amount owed plus interest and penalties. Only the truly rich get away with not paying.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can absolutely fill out your W2 to have no withholdings taken out of your check.

And your HR department can reject it, then tell you to fill it out correctly.

I know people who do this

You're either gullible enough to believe some Sovreign Citizen tier liars or a liar yourself.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

I'm not saying they don't pay their taxes. They just don't have them taken out of their checks each month. They put the money somewhere it can grow, then pay their taxes with it at tax time.

[–] bdjukemgood@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

There are absolutely people who do this. They will pay a penalty for not withholding when they file but they probably still come out ahead even with just a HYSA.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 8 points 23 hours ago

I'm surprised it took so many meeting

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They can’t stop squeezing the working class for every last penny.

[–] scintilla@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are only so many pennies. I don't think I have more to give

[–] Booboofinget@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

They are doing away with pennies too. So they upgraded to taking ever nickel now. Next year, they will be coming for dimes.

[–] griff@lemmings.world 10 points 1 day ago

When the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) arrived at the Internal Revenue Service earlier this year, leaders of the group reassured workers that the agency’s free tax filing tool, Direct File, would be spared from cuts. But only a few days after meeting with tax software lobbyists, the beloved tool was placed on the chopping block, multiple sources familiar tell WIRED. The plans to potentially kill Direct File, the free tax filing tool developed by the IRS which services 25 states, was initiated by Sam Corcos, CEO of an Andreessen Horowitz–backed health startup that has ties to SpaceX. Corcos’ suggestion to cut the popular service was presented to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in the beginning of March, multiple sources familiar say. The weekend before Corcos suggested ending Direct File, he spoke of it positively to IRS engineers. By Friday, he had changed his tune. As sources WIRED spoke to understand it, Direct File would remain online through the 2025 tax filing season but would likely be dead by next year.

[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wait, DOGE still exists?! I thought it was understood to be a completely illegal power grab by the executive

[–] Asafum 18 points 1 day ago

I thought it was understood to be a completely illegal power grab by the executive

Welcome to the Trump administration!

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 2 points 22 hours ago

Since when has that ever stopped anything?

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Didn't you hear that the Supreme Court has declared all power grabs by the Trump administration legal?

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Didn't sometime leak the source code to the government tax filing software, with the intent of making it open source? It's not an ideal solution, but if that is a viable solution (and if it's maintained properly) then that's a pretty big nose-thumbing at these curious government officials.

[–] miked@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The IRS itself released the code, as planned.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 2 points 22 hours ago

some good samaritan will surely create "LibreTax" on github any second now...

aaaaaaaany second now.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Problem I think is the API from the IRS being closed. You could still maybe use it generate pdfs and send it, but the tool allowed you to just click send. And also, no more updates from the official source could mean they get to change a few rules and make it obsolete. We could keep it up with a bunch of volunteers, but unlike other open source projects, this has a serious legal aspect that people might not be willing to take a risk.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

'cause fuck you, that's why!