operative?
Also mathematicians use i for imaginary, engineers use j. The story does not add up. I have never seen a single mathematician use j for imaginary.
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
operative?
Also mathematicians use i for imaginary, engineers use j. The story does not add up. I have never seen a single mathematician use j for imaginary.
As an EE, I used both. Def not a mathematician though. Fuck that, I just plug variables into programs now.
I have both mechanical and electrical backgrounds. MEs like I, EEs prefer j
imaJinary
TIL engineers can't spell for shit.
The associativity thing also doesnt make sense.
I have no idea what they're talking about, but I do love a happy ending.
Why would a mathematician use j for imaginary numbers and why would engineer be mad at them?
The only thing I can think of is that the OP studied electrical engineering at some point. But it's a 4chan story so probably fake anyway.
fake and gay?
I think it might be the wrong way around: Engineers like to use j for imaginary numbers because i is needed for current.
Mathematicians are taught to be elastic with notation, because they tend to be taught many different interpretations of the same theory.
On the other hand engineers use more strict and consistent notation, their classes have a more practical approach.
Using the same notation makes it faster to read and apply math, a more agile approach helps with learning new theories and approaches and with being creative.
Me, a language/arts person: "Huh?"
Web dev here. "Huh?"
Fullstack dev here. "Huh?"
Webdev not knowing anything about computer science (and thus mathematics)? I am shocked. Shocked!
Medical here. "Huh?"
Moron here. "Huh?"
I love how that wannabe 4chan nerd just got outnerded in the comment section
As a physicist I can't understand why would anyone complain about a +jb or $\int dx f(x)$. Probably because we don't fuck
As a software dude I can see you wrote a regex, I just can't find out what you're trying to match.
I think rather d/dx
is the operator. You apply it to an expression to bind free occurrences of x
in that expression. For example, dx²/dx
is best understood as d/dx (x²)
. The notation would be clear if you implement calculus in a program.
I just think of the definition of a derivative.
d
is just an infinitesimally small delta. So dy/dx
is literally just lim (∆ -> 0) ∆y/∆x
.
which is the same as lim (x_1 -> x_0) [f(x_0) - f(x_1)] / [x_0 - x_1]
.
Note: ∆ -> 0
isn't standard notation. But writing ∆x -> 0
requires another step of thinking: y = f(x)
therefore ∆y = ∆f(x) = f(x + ∆x) - f(x)
so you only need ∆x
approaching zero. But I prefer thinking d = lim (∆ -> 0) ∆
.
$\int dx f(x)$ is standard notation for physicists
Yes but everyone knows physicists like weird notations
Can somebody ELI5 this for my troglodyte writer brain?
Integrals are an expression that basically has an opening symbol, and an operation that is written at the end of it that is used also as a closing symbol, looks kinda like:$ {some function of x} dx
.
The person basically said "the dx part can be written at the start also, and that would make my so mad :3": $ dx {some function of x}
.
This gets their so mad because understandably this makes the notation non-standard and harder to read, also you'd have to use parentheses if the expression doesn't just end at the function.
Note: dollar used instead of integral symbol
An integral is usually written like ∫ f(x) dx or alternatively as df(x)/dx. Please note that this is just a way to apply the operation 'Integration', like + applies the operation 'Addition'. There is no real multiplication or division.
But sometimes you can take a shortcut and treat dx as a multiplied constant. This is technically not correct, but under the right circumstances lands you at the same solution as the proper way. This then looks like this ∫ f(y) dy/dx dx = ∫ f(y) dy
Another thing you can do is to move multiplicative constants from inside the Integral to in front of the Integral: ∫ 2f(x) dx = 2 ∫ f(x) dx. (That is always correct btw)
What anon did was combine those two things and basically write ∫ f(x) dx = dx ∫ f(x). Which is nonsensical, but given the above rules not easily disproven.
This is more or less the same tactic used by internet trolls just in a mathy way. Purposefully misinterpreting arguments and information, that cost the other party considerably more energy to discover and rebut. Hence the hate fuck.
My initial thought was that it's surprising that the engineer is using i whereas the mathematician is using j. But I know some engineers who are hardcore in favour of i. No mathematicians who prefer j though. So if such an engineer were dating a mathematician of all people who used j, I could see that being ♠ .