this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
355 points (98.9% liked)

Fediverse vs Disinformation

1461 readers
223 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The liberal establishment's war on the New York City mayoral candidate reflects panic over a growing left challenge to Zionist orthodoxy and the mainstreaming of Palestine solidarity

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 26 minutes ago

It's this and other factors. The real enemy of the neolibs was not communism. The real enemy was and still is the social democracy. The welfare state that protect everyone is what they want to abolish. Mamdani is for lots of people the image of this social democracy. If he wins, they lose. If he wins, he put the social democracy back on track. They are afraid of that.

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Because there are a lot of Zionists in the media. They have their marching orders from their handlers. Kill any progressiveness.

[–] Disaster@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 hours ago

Because it's a shit-tier rag that's consistently skewed in favor of a few special interests - involving apologizing constantly for one that is currently blowing kids up on our dime. I honestly cannot understand why anyone would give this rag any credence since they drummed us into a war in 2003.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 24 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Judith Miller, a former reporter for The New York Times, was a key figure in reporting on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) prior to the 2003 invasion. Her reporting, particularly her exclusives citing Saddam Hussein's possession of WMDs, were prominently used by the Bush administration to build the case for war. Miller later acknowledged that her reporting relied too heavily on sources connected to the Bush administration and that she didn't adequately consider dissenting views. 

https://youtu.be/924DT22tSWE

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

Feels like grasping at straws, here. Sure, NYT aren't his biggest fans, but the article has this as evidence of its' claims:

"opinions on Israel are changing fast", and cautioned that "Mamdani's victory is not a fluke. It's a sign of things to come."

He is, of course, right.

Clearly The MiddleEastEye agrees with NYT about Mamandi, so let me flip that; why is MEE so afraid of Zohran Mamdani?

[–] PillowD@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

After Bidens debate performance they published 80 articles in 2 weeks about it...

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Should they not have? Should they have continued to pretend that the president was lucid when everyone saw him bragging about how he finally beat Medicare?

How many of the articles were apologia?

Because they are capitalists

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 53 points 1 day ago (33 children)

I mentioned Zohran to my aging mother (who lives in a suburb, and cannot vote in NYC elections). She was like, "You didn't vote for him did you? He's a communist"

We decided not to go into details right then, but it's wild what a deep, emotional, response the idea of "communism" evokes. I don't know what she even thinks it is.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago

People were more or less helping each other back in the 50's after the war. The money boys got worried about that and Joseph McCarthy, along with Donald Trump's mentor, Roy Cohn, started a communist witch hunt which eventually got out of hand. The communist stigma remained.

[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

I don't know what she even thinks it is.

She thinks it's the enemy.

That type of response has nothing to do with politics or even reality, it's just "us vs. them". People attribute everything they think is evil to "them".

(It's not just communism hate. Because anyone who knows what it is, know that he isn't one.)

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You know those experiments Pavlov did with dogs that made them salivate to the sound of a bell (because they associated the sound with food)? Boomers essentially had that but the trigger is the word communism and the response is aversion / disgust.

They didn't have the internet back then so mainstream media could essentially control mainstream thought.

load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›