this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
166 points (72.6% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7226 readers
745 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 hours ago

You don't understand, ICE was deporting brown people when we thought they were terrorists, now that ICE is deporting brown people because Trump thinks they're terrorists, it's now evil.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 18 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

And how many of those years were ICE straight up kidnapping people to throw into dungeons?

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

All of them. It was their founding mandate. It’s simply operating more openly and at unimaginable scale this year.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 hours ago

Ask the ICE victims because they were the scary brown people plotting the next 9/11 but never found guilty.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago

That's overly reductive and you know it.

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Wait no you can't do that! The Democrats would never eat my face, I can only conceive of that happening to Republicans

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

If the world were a binary meme world this might make sense, but it's more like saying stuff happened during the day... night... day... night...

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 117 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

There needs to be some kind of immigration enforcement just to handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process. This requires some level of funding, and due to inflation and growing populations it will always result in record breaking funding at some point.

Democrats were denouncing ICE in 2017-2020 because the administration was ordering ICE to pursue practices like stealing children. They are denouncing them now because ICE is kidnapping people off the street and when they show up for court hearings when they are complying with court orders.

This list implies that the Dems are wrong for ever funding ICE and that they are hypocrites for complaining when Republicans are in power. But it glosses over the nuance that ICE really is used far more maliciously when Trump is in power and that denouncing of the specific actions of ICE are completely valid because those are their jackboot thug years.

Dems are shitty on immigration because they are complicit with lowering immigration maximums and excluding too many people while not promoting reforms that improve how ICE behaves. But it isn't the same thing as supporting the ICEstappo when in office, because they dial it back to a shitty level instead of full on villain mode.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

just to handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process.

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) handles this. They and ICE were founded in 2002 along Customs and Border Patrol. ICE is the result of the merging of two separate enforcement agencies: part of the US Customs Services and the enforcement arm of the Immigration and Naturalization Services.

Illegal entries caught within 100 miles of the border weren't classified as deportations until the George W. Bush administration. Obama was colloquially known as Deporter in Chief for these high numbers.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

There needs to be some kind of immigration enforcement just to handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process.

No there doesn't. We don't have anything similar like a dedicated anti-immigration police in Canada or in the EU. There are border protection agencies and there are immigration bureaucracies, but this special immigration police thing going on in the US, is not a thing.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Ice is a newish agency formed after 9/11 with the also dystopianly named DHS. It was a product of the time of patriot acts and TSA. None of them are needed or helpful or going away.

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

What makes you think "handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process" had to include anti-immigration police?

I get the feeling you don't disagree with the parent commenter at all.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago

ICE is a law enforcement agency. It's a police. With a special immigration mandate.

I guess I am not clear what is meant by “handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process”. In Canada, things like applications and forms are handled by IRCC, the immigration ministry. Other than that, there is CBSA, which is like your CBP, but we don't have a specialized interior immigration police.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 47 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Absolutely. The solution is comprehensive immigration reform. Until Congress passes it, we will continue to deport people due to our overcomplicated and flawed system.

It’s also important to note that more immigrants cross the border under Democratic presidents, and most deportations under those presidents are people caught at the border, versus the rounding up and deporting of working, tax-paying immigrants who have been here for years.

CBP vs ICE

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, which is why ICE and all immigration enforcement under Trump is many, many times worse than under the Dems and still would be even if the reforms were in place because Trump is ignoring the laws and court orders that should be preventing him from deporting people to 3rd party countries just like he ignored the orders against separating children from parents.

Even if the Dems were sugar and spice and everything nice we would still have some kind of immigration enforcement in place and it would have been twisted into to what it is now because conservatives don't care about following the laws they dislike.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

True. It’s long overdue regardless. We are still using the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA). Obama pushed for immigration reform, but all Congress was able to pass with a weak majority was DACA in 2012.

Republicans want a broken system so they have a scapegoat for elections.

[–] anaVal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 18 hours ago

for an anarchist perspective on this topic: https://crimethinc.com/books/no-wall-they-can-build.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 42 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

weird how you focus on Democrats when the Republicans are the problem here

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 17 hours ago

everyone who gives a fuck knows republicans are the problem, what many people don't realize is that the democrats merrily sit at the same table as republicans, so people need to be informed about that so they can recognize that both parties are shit and there needs to be actual change.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

They're both problems, and fixing the Democrats is the solution to both problems. Democrats repeatedly embracing the status quo is what lets Republicans keep winning, and Republicans won't change as long as they're winning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bleys@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

Weird how all these anti-Democrats think that the only competitive left party in the US failing will somehow lead to the Republicans relinquishing power instead of consolidating it.

Russia had two or three fair elections after the fall of the Soviet Union, until Putin came into power and now he “wins” every election with 98% of the vote.

But I’m sure if the Democratic Party disappeared tomorrow then somehow Republicans would just give up their power. Lol.

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

And all of these "vote-blue or die" people are the reason the Dems are totally fucking useless and only pretend to care.

Protip, you can still vote blue while still recognizing they are totally fucking useless clowns, sucking their dick while you do it doesnt change anything.

[–] Bleys@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Lol bro, go ahead and don’t vote then. Maybe if we let the GOP win all three branches uncontested for the next century and they dismantle education, gerrymander or just outright remove fair elections, and kill the planet with climate change, then people will feel really bad and adopt your politics. It’s worked so many times in the past.

Also there’s a difference between valid criticisms of the Democratic Party and this post which is demonizing them on the same level as the GOP simply because Democrats spent money on their border patrol. As if Obama or Biden were the ones who introduced Alligator Alcatraz.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 34 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

Average Lemmy user, "There is no difference between the politician on the left and the politician on the right."

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Anyone who knows the guy on the left: "Hindenburg went out of his way to empower Hitler and the Nazis when it was clear that his coalition was failing. Instead of working with the Social Democrats, he empowered the Nazi. Without his choices, there's a chance that the Hitler wouldn't have come to power. He's an awful person."

You: "so you think there's no difference between the two?!"

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 hours ago

The guy on the left appointed Hitler and then gave him power with the Enabling Act and aided in giving him unchecked powers.

So without Hindenburg, Hitler wouldn't have been put into power. So he's far from a good guy.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Still waiting for the Democrats to start fighting Nazis

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago

But they wrote strongly worded letters, that's the same right?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The only two who tried to shoot Trump were right wing. I have seen any leftists/socialists try and stop Trump either.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Shooting Trump wouldn't really help? He'd just become a martyr for MAGA and JD Vance would do all the shit Trump was going to do, but also use the assassination as an excuse to deport leftists.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

This all under a picture of Hitler hah

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I was just going to point out that deportations were higher under Biden.

Then I remembered who that guy in the picture is!

Hindenburg literally appointed Hitler chancellor, approved the Reichstag Fire Decree, and gave the Nazis emergency powers by singing the Enabling Act of 1933. Do you not even credit him slightly for the rise of Hitler and the Nazis?

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Lebensraum, and the implied means to achieve it, was a policy goal of WW1 as it happens.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

That's kind of the idea I was thinking of. Lemmy users would focus on the bad of Hindenburg and declare him identical to Hitler. Hindenburg wasn't a saint but it's wrong to say there's no difference between Hindenburg and Hitler.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 29 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)
  1. Between 2011 and 2015 the ICE budget stayed the same or fell in 2 years.

  2. Democrats enforced Obama era rules of 72 hour holding limitations for women and children, and followed a criminal-only persecution which actually deported more people than Trump despite the number of cages Trump filled. Thats what this is all about. Trump is filling cages for the private prison industry's profits.

If you don't want the DNC to compromise then elect more than 50 of them to the Senate, and a strong house majority.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You say inflation makes numbers go up each year?

[–] chortle_tortle@mander.xyz 4 points 11 hours ago

Weird that inflation only seems to really exist for the carceral state.

load more comments
view more: next ›