this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
868 points (94.1% liked)

Fuck AI

3376 readers
1624 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

Well yeah I don't know how to make pictures myself so yeah

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

"If only I'd programmed the robot to be more careful what I wished for. Robot, experience this tragic irony for me!"

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

NOOOOOOOOOOO

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 21 hours ago (8 children)

Your Brain on ChatGPT

…LLM users displayed the weakest connectivity. Cognitive activity scaled down in relation to external tool use... LLM users also struggled to accurately quote their own work. While LLMs offer immediate convenience, our findings highlight potential cognitive costs. Over four months, LLM users consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels.

Outsourcing thinking from your brain to an AI literally makes you dumber, less confident in the output, and teaches you nothing.

Call me a Luddite or a hater, but if you’re one of the people who uses AI as a shortcut to actual thought or learning, I will judge you and disregard your output and opinions. Form your own basis of understanding and knowledge instead of a teaspoon deep summary that is frequently incorrect.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

They say that, when making an Anki deck, using it is only half the battle because a lot of the learning comes from the act of making it yourself. That advice is older than these LLMs and it really showcases a big reason why they suck. Personally, I haven’t even used autocorrect since 2009.

Being a luddite I feel requires having a highly abstinence-only approach. Knowing what is worth off-loading and what is worth doing yourself is just being smart. I’m really glad that I don’t need to know every detail of modern life but I still take a lot of pride in knowing how quite a lot of it works.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ElfWord@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (7 children)

This is such a weird take.

Oh poor baby, you need a wittle spell check to make sure you don't mess up the words in your important email?

Oh little loser, you gotta have an automatic transmission to make the car go vroom vroom?

Oh Mr. has-a-life, you have to pull out Shazam instead of knowing 8 million songs by heart?

All of us use technology to make our lives easier, to supplement skills we don't want to sink perfectionist-level time into, to enjoy "good enough" results in one area or another.

This kind of holier-than-thou hyperbolic snobbery does nothing to generate actual thoughtful reflection of where to draw the line with technology dependence and only distracts and detracts from actually good critiques of generative AI's ethics and other negative effects. I wish this sub didn't allow low-effort meme posts because it's such a brain rot circle-jerk.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

What do you mean "don't want"?

ChaosGPT, build me a time machine!

[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The loss of skill requirements within trades and crafts is likely a major factor in the cascades of ineptitude we experience in our society. The barriers to entry also directly benefitted the quality of those spaces, and naturally flagged the incompetent (if you are incompetent and lack spell check, your mis-spellings served as a demonstration that you are not a skilled writer. Same for driving, musical recognition, engineering as well).

We've seen a clear decline in the general quality of all products, and I can't help but feel that the automation of skill is directly connected to that decline. This tweet seems to mirror that sentiment in its mockery. You don't have to think anymore about pretty much any of the process, you just get an output you can ship immediately. So it goes without saying that you can be without any skill and still have a footprint within spaces you have no merit to be in.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

What kind of evidence are you seeing that there is a loss in skill requirements and lowered barriers to entry?

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You said something here that is pertinent, but also revealing. We all use technology everyday to make our lives easier, but does it? The automatic transmission cited above allowed anyone with a pulse the ability to get behind the wheel of a car rather than putting in any effort to acquire the skill to operate a motor vehicle. Great for the people who built our car-ciety, we have all suffered for it, including inaccessible essential services w/o one and getting stuck in traffic caused in the most part by people who should never be behind a wheel of a car. Do you want people writing books and creating art that have no business writing books or creating art? Cause we've got that now. Great...

[–] vorpuni@jlai.lu 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think automatic transmissions are in any way responsible for car centric urban planning, Europe has plenty of it and the transition to automatics is very slow and quite recent.

I agree far too many people are allowed to drive when they shouldn't but people dying on the road is more socially acceptable than stringent standards for being allowed to operate lethal machines at insanely high speeds (in terms of kinetic energy at least).

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, the automatic transmission is not solely responsible, but it was a means to an end. How can we get more people in cars? Make it easier to drive! Brilliant. Except now we have this... It's irrational but it's my brain and I can do what I want with it!

[–] centipede_powder@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Too true. Cars and motorized vehicles make everything too easy. Lets go back to horses. But even that is making people less capable of walking long distance. Lets go back to the good old days of not technology at all!

[–] ElfWord@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

We all use technology everyday to make our lives easier, but does it?

🙄 Yes. If you disagree with something this obvious, please write me a lengthy letter explaining why and send it by horse & buggy mail carrier. I promise, I'll read and respond just as soon as I'm able.

Do you want people writing books and creating art that have no business writing books or creating art?

🤮🤮🤮 Maybe we should require an intelligence test before allowing people to post their opinions on the internet too? Or have children?

If you actually think that disallowing some people to create art because they aren't "good enough," then you aren't really defending art or artists at all.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The point is we value people who are at the top of their specific game for a reason. When the barriers to access are removed, that's great, but it dilutes the end game product over all. Sorry not sorry. Easier lives makes dumber people I guess? Boy that's so cool! I get it, busy people can use AI to make their days less busy, but people who aren't too busy are using it and getting dumber for it. Prove me wrong. Yes technology has a myriad of benefits, but also a myriad of pitfalls too. Weird, eh? I'm not disallowing people from making art, but no one should or would buy it in a real world environment. I would ask, what value does it add to the world? Art is an expression of the artist interpreting the world. AI art is rubbish and it gives you exactly what you ask for. Cool? Maybe, but not art.

[–] ElfWord@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Again, this whole idea that you need to make an argument about the tradeoffs of technology in general in order to make an argument against AI is weak and needless. Do you have a smart phone you use the calculator on sometimes, or do you write out all your long-form division? Is everyone who owns a microwave, uses tax preparation software, or switches to an electric toothbrush just a lazy dumb-dumb in your mind?

When the barriers to access are removed, that’s great

but it dilutes the end game product over all.

AI art is rubbish and it gives you exactly what you ask for.

Cool? Maybe,

This is just talking out of both sides of your mouth trying to sound fair and balanced instead of actually making a good argument. "AI art is rubbish" -- yes!!! We don't need vacuous, hypocritical hot takes on using technology to say that.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's not the only thing I'm talking about, but it seemed relevant to the post? Way to fixate on one thing I am saying instead of just agreeing with me? I thought an argument was supposed to be thought out? I'm not just talking about AI though. I really hate the automatic transmission if you really want to know. Like, it doesn't rule my life or anything, I just think it has allowed stupid people to get in my way. AI art is slop and I'm not afraid of being replaced. Just so we are clear!

[–] centipede_powder@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

You are mad at automatic transmission too? Maybe you should also consider the method in which you are having this conversation before attacking types technology. Tech has always been about making things easier.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It doesn't do that at all. People creating great art isn't going away. Stop being a dumb gatekeeper too.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Who is gatekeeping?! Just cause I don't feel the same as you doesn't mean you can't do a thing? Technology is great, but it can also be stupid, and dangerous, and misused and by golly, even detrimental.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

bruh, it's literally a mockery. they are mocking the ineptitude of people who use AI.

way to overanalyze a tweet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

The goddamn meta commercial where the dad is asking, "meta, how do I get my toddler to eat breakfast" makes me wants to implode every fucking time. Like you can't feed your kid?

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Not sure how that is different to googling it

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

I won't pretend I didn't Google things, but it was mainly getting them to sleep. When you aren't sleeping, desperation is a very real thing.

Eating though, I like to use "This is the next thing you eat" on my kids.

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

where the fuck are meta commercials popping up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] msage@programming.dev 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They will monetize those chatbots.

And I want to see how many will pull out their wallet when it happens.

And I worry it will be almost every hardcore user, for the fear of being left out and performing worse than anyone else.

The trap is set, it has sprung, and now we wait will the owner comes for the feast.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They will monetize those chatbots.

They already did? They have premium plans, pro plans, free plans, etc.

[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 14 hours ago

I mean they will disable the free version.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 29 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (9 children)

I delivered pizza during COVID and most people I worked with couldn't follow simple directions to an address or read a road map. If a destination didn't show up on their cellphone's navigation then they were immediately and hopelessly lost.

If you don't use and exercise your brain then it atrophies and dies. AI is going turn a lot of people into conscious vegetables.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Can it maybe just give her an orgasm for me? I'm way to lazy to do it myself.

/it's sarcasm, you dumb fuck

[–] match@pawb.social 3 points 16 hours ago

me doublefisting magic wands

load more comments
view more: next ›