this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
426 points (97.1% liked)

politics

24584 readers
2832 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump is facing a sharp backlash from young voters, with new polling showing his approval rating among Generation Z has dropped to one of its lowest points yet.

The latest YouGov/Yahoo poll, conducted between June 26-30 among 1,597 adults, shows that among Gen Z voters, his net rating has deteriorated sharply, falling from -23 points in May to -41 points in June.

Net ratings do have a tendency to swing much more than a simple approval rating. Still, the president's approval rating in June is low, at 27 percent. The margin of error is at plus or minus 3.2 percent.

Lucas Walsh, a youth political behavior expert and professor at Monash University, told Newsweek that Trump's falling support among Gen Z voters may reflect how young people "respond to issues rather than party allegiances."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What amazes me is that there are still people who look at what Donald Trump has done in his life, what he has said and done to become president (twice!) and what he's done since taking office. They look at all this, take a big huff of their own farts and say "I approve of this"

I can't imagine that it takes anything less than a very special kind of cognitive disability to be intelligent enough to use twitter, but dumb enough to support this petulant, stroppy, bafflingly stupid man-toddler.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

There has been a concerted effort for the last 15 to 20 years by the alt-right to court young disillusioned men and women using divisiveness and the slowly declining status quo as a lever.

Doesn't matter that the insanely wealthy right wing is primarily responsible for pushing the deterioration, it only matters that the insanely wealthy liberals in the government haven't done anything substantive to stop it.

For reference, see Nancy Pelosi's fucking dedicated ice cream fridge she showed off in an interview to seem relatable.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

How it got to any measurable levels in the first place is the real mystery.

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

This discontent does not appear to be translating into strong support for Democrats. The Quantus poll suggests that young voters are feeling politically homeless, with 43 percent of Gen Z voters saying that neither party represents American values.

Welcome to the “party”…

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Why does his approval rating matter? Even if those stats are valid?

[–] ape_arms@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Right? I see all of these "appeasement" style pieces trying to get us to feel some sort of vindication. It's all bullshit.

[–] traceur301@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

Newsweek is a blight, and deplatforming it would improve anywhere it's found

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Those stats might affect the adoration of his groupies, and how many are re-elected.

Most horribly of all, we have Vance thinking he can step into the big orange footprints to be ordained next. We can’t have that weasel elected. It would be more of the same but more evil, less self-centered gibberish

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

If you didn't recognize what he was after the disaster that was his first administration, all his admission of what he said he would do, and then still either voted for him or didn't vote because you didn't recognize the repeat threat he was and couldn't get off your fat ass to vote to prevent him from taking office, I'm sorry, but you're in the group of people who can't handle responsibilities of being a fucking adult.

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 54 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

too late for post-nut clarity, kids. he's not just a person he's a cultural moment y'all embraced and is going to take a lot more of a "well maybe he's not that great for the economy" to unfuck ourselves from. how about some introspection about why we're attracted to narcissists or so deeply spiritually moved by shitty tough-man antics? where's that political analysis?

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Yeah. But they saved Gaza.

/s

[–] Karrion409@lemmy.world 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Too fucking late man. Dudes already in office wrecking the country..

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Dumbasses needed to see him do it live rather than google the existing data on how disastrous his last term was. Last time he was in office, they were listening to Baby Shark. "It happened 5 years ago so that's ancient history. I've got better things to do, like doomscrolling Tiktok for 8 hours"

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The people who support Trump en masse are not really represented here. His dedicated base absolutely love everything he is doing. Especially the immigrant Holocaust he has started.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

His polling numbers dont matter. Either he cannot run for president again or he fucks up the government bad enough to allow him to, in which case the vote is going to be rigged AF anyway.

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 3 points 2 hours ago

If he hasn't had a heart from all the hamberders by the next election cycle I guarantee he will run for president again and it'll be up to congress and or the supreme court to stop him. Depending on the make up of those to entities I think there's a chance they would stop him.

Rules for thee but not for me and all that.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago

IF it's from Newsweek, it's just a shitty clickbait title with nothing of actual substance in the actual article. Lemmy users need to stop posting Newsweek links, it is not a good source to trust.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsweek/

[–] infyrian@kbin.melroy.org 31 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

And yet Gen Z still didn't do anything. Loud and proud, until it comes to actually doing anything.

[–] Karrion409@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago

Im gen z and I voted Harris. I also attended no kings Chicago. Not all of us are just sitting and watching this happen but enough are that it makes us look bad.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Man, the tiktok kids will do it, the weird Taylor swift fans band together are unstoppable. Turns out, it's all just internet bullshit. Who knew?

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

All he virtual fame points and karma farmed from raging on the establishment and the boomers, though...

/s you dumb kids

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 261 points 1 day ago (36 children)

The fact that he ever had an approval rating with Gen Z is mind-boggling.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The polling numbers after the election were horrifying. GenZ are like the Hitler Youth of today. Not just voting Trump because their parents were Republicans and influenced their political outlook, but enthusiastically embracing Trump because of memes and TikTok, not actually considering the consequences carefully.

It's shameful, because even though most GenZ kids were not old enough to vote, they were almost old enough to vote back in 2016 when Trump took office the first time. It's not like they are looking back at the early years of politics from their childhood fondly, they were definitely old enough to be able to see how destructive he was.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

He got a lot of gen z votes! Shit is Fucked up.

They get their news front social media and watch ufc

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Gen Z was explicitly not taught how to read properly. It’s very difficult to not be conspiracist and think it was on purpose. Phonics was thrown out entirely for years. Teachers spoke up about it not working, and were forced to work the programs anyway.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 76 points 20 hours ago

Repeat after me: He doesn't fucking care.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Single issue protestors put in in office. Now they don’t like him there?

[–] mintiefresh@lemmy.ca 20 points 18 hours ago

It doesn't matter.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago

Just wait about 20 minutes, Newsweek will have a headline about fascism and GenZ. I loath that clickbait factory.

load more comments
view more: next ›