Guy explains to CEO of Signal (messaging) that it's going to add "AI" to the service. She says no. He insists, not knowing or caring who he's talking down to. : fuck

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

!dontyouknowwhoiam@lemmy.world

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

Thank you for that!

I have been laughing for the past hour.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wonder if he would have done the same thing talking to a man...

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder [whether] he would have done the same thing talking to a man...

I was entertained to see someone get their comeuppance.

I was disappointed to see someone else immediately go sexist on the post.

I am now doubly disappointed that we're not better than that person, here.

Sometimes an idiot is just an idiot. Leave room for people to grow into, okay?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And sometimes idiots are sexist.

Why are you dismissing this as a possibility?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Why are you dismissing this as a possibility?

They're not. The burden of proof works in a way that the person making a claim ("they're sexist") needs to back it up with evidence. They're not saying he's definitively not sexist; they're saying there's insufficient evidence.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 1 day ago

ROFL Reply guys, they are a special kind of dumb sometimes.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago

What she doesn't realize is that he's secretly leading a coup from inside the company.

/joke

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Didn't realize I clicked a link and wondered when the screenshot was going to end...

[–] dylanmorgan@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Also, even this suggestion betrays a lack of understanding about how signal works. A big part of the long term security signal offers is that they don’t store data, so LLM integration would be on-device.

[+] kepix@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

[deleted]

[+] LemmyIsReddit2Point0@lemmy.world -12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (10 children)

[deleted]

load more comments (10 replies)

[+] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works -9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

His reply is moronic… but “No ❤️” isn’t a great reply either.

[–] LycanGalen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I found the response humorous. I'd imagine if she felt this was actually important to address (rather than some idiot spouting BS) there would be a post from the Signal account, rather than her personal profile, and it would look very different.

[–] bigfoot@lemm.ee -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"The burden of identification is not on the reply guy, but the women womst replied to..."

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What does this even mean or have to do with what I said?

[–] bigfoot@lemm.ee -2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm making fun of your clichéd comment.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brevity sticks

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago

In this case brevity is not the soul of wit. It was a dumb reply to a comment that didn’t deserve one to begin with.

Fuck AI