this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
474 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck AI

3139 readers
991 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

human-driven technology goes brrrrr

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wonder if he would have done the same thing talking to a man...

[–] themoken@startrek.website 13 points 22 hours ago

People are putting this on sexism or whatever, but I feel like this dude is just one of those confidently wrong people and would have said this to literally anyone disagreeing with him.

I am a man, and an expert in my field, and I get people trying to condescend semi-regularly because they think they can handwave the problems I get paid to solve. Just completely unfounded confidence.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder [whether] he would have done the same thing talking to a man...

I was entertained to see someone get their comeuppance.

I was disappointed to see someone else immediately go sexist on the post.

I am now doubly disappointed that we're not better than that person, here.

Sometimes an idiot is just an idiot. Leave room for people to grow into, okay?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And sometimes idiots are sexist.

Why are you dismissing this as a possibility?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Why are you dismissing this as a possibility?

They're not. The burden of proof works in a way that the person making a claim ("they're sexist") needs to back it up with evidence. They're not saying he's definitively not sexist; they're saying there's insufficient evidence.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

But it's not unreasonable to suspect sexism, even if we don't know for sure one way or the other. Suspicious behavior isn't proof of guilt, but it's still pretty sus 😒

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Okay, but she just responds with the misandrist "why are men", obviously directly accusing him of being sexist on inconclusive circumstantial evidence. That's going well beyond "suspecting" him of anything.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

They're making accusations based on reasonable suspicion. That's still not going beyond suspicion - it's not like anyone is calling for any action to be taken against him. He's not losing his job, or being doxxed, or has protesters outside his house.

It's just an accusation in the extremely low stakes Court of public opinion.