this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
493 points (98.6% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

3076 readers
696 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

They test for "ecstacy", the street name, not "MDMA" the official name? Where did he get these test results from, his dealer?

Opiates are tested, and oxycodone? But oxycodone is an opiate. Is this list created by chatgpt?

It says it was a urine sample. As if the richest man in the world cannot get a clean urine sample from someone. It's probably from the only kid he gives attention (to block snipers when he's out in the open). That's probably why the kid punched him in the face. Because daddy wanted to touch his pipi.

[–] nonfuinoncuro@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 minutes ago

weirdly enough I typically see oxycodone listed separately from opiates in urine drug screens my guess is there's an easy enough test to tell the difference and oxycodone is a commonly enough prescribed pill so there are times when it is useful to see if you're taking legit prescriptions vs you're self medicating off the street vs you're diverting your own scripts to the street

the rest i dunno

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Extacy is not MDMA but a pill that contains MDMA (and sometimes some nice extras).
MDMA is the pure goodness that you dip your finger into.

Also there is no specific extacy test since MDMA belongs to the amphetamine family (like speed and meth) and they will test for that.
This test result sounds like BS.

Also read the reviews for this testing lab.
And why did he choose that one if he's in Texas?

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Ecstacy is a pill form of MDMA and should not contain extras. It could have MDEA and MDA instead of MDMA, which are very similar. It mostly depends on the chemicals these factories are able to get. The fact that junk pills do contain other stuff like caffeine, doesnt make Ecstacy normally a mix. There are mix pills which contain amphetamine, 2CB or LSD but these are sold under their own, different name.

I don't know if you've ever seen a pill factory from the inside, but I have here in the Netherlands. Also I've seen loads of ecstacy tests, as we are free to test our drugs here.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Funny thing about pics on the internet. You can swear upside down and backwards they are legit, but we all know better

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Well, as much as I'd love to believe him, I can't. I start immediately asking questions, like, why is every word either all caps or start with a capital letter except for the word "negative"? Could be the way that lab does it, but almost nowhere else seems to.

[–] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

what stood out to me is my name has been printed as Last, First on every medical form i have ever seen!

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Ohhh. I didn't notice that bit. Same.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

From all the ways, that is probably the worst argument to dismiss it with.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

Yes. I mean this as more of a, "I trust him so little that I automatically pick up the smallest detail and assume he is still lying."

I would normally give someone the benefit of the doubt.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

I think that's normal according to this random PDF I've found

Not saying much, he has an infinite amount of ways of faking it

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

At least you know he's positive for all those things.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago

Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder who's piss he used?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 hours ago

Maybe the serialnumber kid?

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

“There is no quicker way for people to think that you are diddling kids than by writing a song about it!”

First thing that came to mind.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

That really irks me in a way. Not the subject of kiddy-diddling being bad, obviously.

Just that, for some reason, music is the only art form where everything you write is taken to mean a first person perspective. Even if you have written about a fictional character and you sing in character, you still get judged as if "you" are the one talking/singing.

The famous example is Money for nothing by Dire Straits, but i could probably find many more. I kind of want music to be able to tell stories, including those about bad people.

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I used to do a handful of various substances daily. I passed every single urinalysis I took and I was high out of my mind when I would take them it's called OPP

Ya down with OPP ?!

Yeah! You Know Me !

Edit: I knew how to do drugs and never acted like this dummy. Not once !

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Everyone says he is high, he is visibly high, and he admits to doing drugs on the regular... Clean drug screen!? How fucking stupid does he think everyone is.

[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Even if it's somehow legit, I don't know if that doesn't make the shit he does even worse. You mean he was sober when he did the Nazi salute?!

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I mean, many voted for Trump, so... He's kinda' right to think most people are fucking brainless morons.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 5 hours ago

Very, and his horde of ass kissers "proves it right" to him every day

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 23 points 9 hours ago

How did this dud ever get mistaken for a genius?

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Most of these drugs are pretty much undetectable after abstaining for a few days. Big deal. Negative cannabis use surprised me a little but he probably left it behind when he picked up his ketamine binge. That said who the hell advertises their test results like this wtf?

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

He has an army of neglected kids, do you really think he would stop using for a few days to use his own urine?

[–] obre@lemmy.world 36 points 12 hours ago (3 children)
[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 hours ago

The richest mothefucker chooses the shadiest black market lab available? Makes sense.

Maybe he just bought some results, and it's not like his chosen substances are visible for long in piss tests anyway

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 12 points 10 hours ago

The door thing in that first review is because they're supposed to monitor that you don't have a stash of someone else's urine that you're giving them to pass your drug test.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

Ketamine goes away in 4-8 hours for most people.

[–] Zedd00@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

Fun story time: I once got informed of a drug test for a job I'd just accepted after a weekend of hard partying. I was on prescription opiods, Adderall, and ketamine. They called Monday morning at 9 to tell me I had to piss within 4 hours. I hadn't even slept yet. I should have lit that test up like a Christmas tree for everything except thc. It came back clean. They never asked about my prescriptions. I have 2 theories. 1) they don't actually test. 2) if too many things light up, they assume it's a calibration issue.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

If they don't send you to a lab for the test, it's often just a scare tactic.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 39 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 12 hours ago

"Indestructible!"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Even if the test were irrefutably him (and it could be totally fake or someone else), how much would it cost to make an illegal clone of himself? How many do you think Musk could afford? Why should I trust any billionaire?

[–] JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch 7 points 6 hours ago

A pet clone is like 50k, I don't think cloning a human is technically more challenging, so 50k plus hush money?

Not that that is necessary, you could just get anyones urine.

I was musing with friends recently that there's no way that there's no billionaires with illegal clones that they pretend are regular kids already. I mean the tech bro billionaires would eat that shit up once they hear that it's technically feasible. And Musk is the likeliest idiot to do it imo.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 112 points 16 hours ago (11 children)

Well I for one am perfectly convinced that patient TX45788288 is clean and free of drugs. Of course, I don't really know who that is. Probably isn't Musk though. Even if it is, I'm quite sure that he could easily find someone to piss in a cup for him for a million or so. Hell, I hate the dirt bag and I would have done it for a million bucks.

Also, I would never impute the integrity of Jennifer Taylor of Fastest Labs of South Austin, but I think maybe her boss should check to see if she suddenly jumped into a new tax bracket.

The fact that you can conceive if paying someone $1M to pee in a cup is how I can tell you're not rich. If you were, it would have been a few thousand at most but more likely to be a threat of some sort to compel the other person to help you.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] FilthyHands@sh.itjust.works 30 points 13 hours ago

This is as legitimate as his Path of Exile account.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Specimen type: Urine

How do we know he used his own urine?

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 hours ago

"We don't know if it was in fact his urine. Um, you can't, like, dust for urine." - a prominent musician

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 hours ago

He wanted to, but unfortunately it burned right through the container and the fumes made the lab tech high as a kite.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›