this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
268 points (95.3% liked)

World News

47596 readers
2563 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its incredibly sad how Tibet was just completely forgotten in just a few years. Its legit scary how effective China is at conquest and the world should pay attention.

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wasnt Tibetan society like 90% slaves working for the monastic rulers?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A narrative that conveniently ignores that the Dalai Llama was, and is, more of a socialist than the CCP ever mustered to be and was always very much on board with reforming everything. Or, well, the current incarnation always was. The split only came after it became clear that tankies gonna tank, that is, the CCP cared less about the freedom of the people (both in a spiritual and material sense) than about having full control over a mineral-rich mountain fortress to build a military-industrial base that couldn't be shelled from the ocean. Tibet alas is, geographically, the Switzerland of the Himalayas. Another factor was the sheer popularity of the Llama in Tibet, spiritual leader + socialist is a sure-fire double whammy to popularity but threatened the party's prerogative of interpretation not to mention orthodox Marxist doctrine, opium for the people and everything.

You know what's the most absurd thing about all this, especially considering Marxist materialism? That the CCP is claiming that it can legislate on reincarnation. And not in the "yeah this is all BS" sense, that'd be par for the course, but in the "ok here is how it's going to be done" sense. Went so far as to accuse the Dalai Llama of blasphemy for suggesting that whether and how he reincarnates will be up to him. And I guess the CCP is stuck on insisting that incarnation is real because otherwise the can't blame the current Dalai Llama for the politics of his previous lives?

[–] dinren@discuss.online 41 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

china isn't marxist at all. western communists want a hero, but there just isn't one.

[–] dinren@discuss.online 6 points 2 days ago

I know. I’m talking about the ML, not China. The ML are nowhere when China is dirty.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 13 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I'm all for shitting on tankies but I'm unsure what part of an all-male divine birthright theocracy they're supposed to support?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Except Tibet never got a chance to grow and adapt to the new world. You could literally say that about 90% of Asia which has a lot of problems but actually had the chance to grow because they were not violently occupied by a brutal invader.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NotProLemmy@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (8 children)

🪲 (imagine this is a cricket)

[–] T156@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

🦗

As it turns out, there is a cricket emoji.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They support the Han ethnostate

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (4 children)

One China and all. Oh other people exist? Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee one China!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Get out of those temples kids. It is time to consoooom

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

~~What is this website (is it reputable?) and~~ why are Myanmar journalists the ones to discuss this, when they have a civil war to worry about? Is China supporting the opposite side to these journalists'?

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

China is a direct neighbour of Myanmar, with a history of political meddling in Myanmar and also of setting up illegal exploitative businesses by entrepreneurs. But even without the meddling, they are direct neighbours, which should be enough reason for Myanmar journalists to want to know what is going on in China.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Huh, I thought every conflict in the world was the fault of the US...welcome to the multipolar world I guess :/

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fault? I didn't mean to imply that China is responsible for starting the latest bout of civil war in Myanmar, because they weren't. There's really no reason to believe that whenever something bad happens, some outside big boogeyman is entirely to blame. If you want to know what caused the current civil war to start, try looking it up, but please don't make assumptions.

If you can't look it up because of time constraints or other reasons, then accept that you don't know. It's impossible to know everything, so there's nothing wrong with not knowing some things. But imo not knowing something and knowing that you don't know, is a lot better than making assumptions and inventing alternate facts.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Where did I say it was China's fault? Even if I was being sarcastic that for once it wasn't the US, how did you interpret that I said it had to be China?

PS: ah, was it the multipolar world thing? Ok, I was thinking in the sense of post-US. I'm just surprised that for once there isn't a bunch of people blaming "the west" for it. Maybe that's why people don't care about it.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

My bad for assuming wrong.

And yeah, sarcasm with just text doesn't work very well, got to add something for making obvious that it is sarcasm, or plenty of people (me included as you saw) will assume otherwise.

it's one of the best sources in Myanmar

load more comments
view more: next ›