this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
198 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24084 readers
3184 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Trump’s political team is encouraging Republican leaders in Texas to examine how House district lines in the state could be redrawn ahead of next year’s midterm elections to try to save the party’s endangered majority, according to people in Texas and Washington who are familiar with the effort.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Gerrymandering is one of those not-talked-about-enough legal undermining of democracy commited by mostly* Republicans.

* are there any examples of Democrat gerrymandering? Or statistics, though I'm sure Reps do it much much more?

[–] msfroh@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I may be remembering incorrectly, but after the 2019 Supreme Court ruling that federal courts can't address partisan gerrymandering, a couple of blue states (New York and Illinois maybe?) tried doing some gerrymanders after the 2020 census. Then their state courts struck them down.

Several blue states -- I think Washington and Oregon are among them -- created non-partisan redistricting commissions before 2019, so they can't be gerrymandered.

As is typical, the blue states end up doing the thing that's right; the red states just keep doing the thing that wins.

[–] Hotrod54chevy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

It's always about "states rights" until they don't 100% line up with their vision.

[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Is Trump's biggest fear that Texas will turn blue? Texas, do the opposite of what Trump orders.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe we have enough people of the political leaning in Texas to oust the Republicans, but only if they get the fuck to the polls and vote. Which they historically have not done.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's probably been several cycles in a row that the Democratic Presidential nominee had garnered more votes in Texas than the Republican Gubernatorial nominee.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You know I never even thought to compare that. Turnout here is just so bloody awful.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Texas is 100% purple for the last 10 years. We need these rural counties to realize the republican party doesn't give a shit about them to turn blue. Too many Rs with their head in the sand.

For fucks sake, our energy grid is making fuck tons of money on wind power, yet the Rs constantly try to tear it down.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

they are trying to cripple solar because their gas plants have to either lower production or shutdown cause solar and wind drops energy prices so low it's not profitable to run.

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Blatant gerymandering has been shot down in court before. I know it's Texas, but we can dream

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Blatant gerymandering has been shot down in court before. I know it's Texas, but we can dream

Only racially based gerrymandering. The SCOTUS ruled federal courts can't review partisan gerrymandering.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rucho_v._Common_Cause

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

2019!

The Court ruled that while partisan gerrymandering may be "incompatible with democratic principles", the federal courts cannot review such allegations, as they present nonjusticiable political questions outside the jurisdiction of these courts.

oof...

Only racially based gerrymandering.

How convenient, since there's no racism in the USA anyhow. /s

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The SCOTUS ruled federal courts can't review partisan gerrymandering.

Which is so goddamn fucking stupid. It's literally why gerrymandering exists in the first place.

The regime is using the Texan circuit to push through its bullshit, don't cross your fingers

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Welcome to America where the rules are made up and the truth doesn’t matter.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Welcome to America where the rules ~~are~~ is made up and the truth ~~doesn't~~ don’t matter.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago

I know this is a tired refrain...

But holy shit, imagine if Joe Biden or (god forbid) Obama, tried to pull some bullshit like this. Unreal.

[–] tla@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

we know... It's already bad enough as it is. But to even increase it, with recent SCOTUS and now presidential approval...

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I thought districts can only be redrawn following the census. Or when court-ordered to do so.

I think we won't see any rebalancing of the legislature in Texas until there is a Democratic surge that flips the state and federal offices. Probably a US Senate in a presidential year. That will turn Texas into a battle state for Gov, Lt. Gov, and AG in following mid-term election. Only then will we have a chance at districts being redrawn to be more representative.