this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025

693 points (99.1% liked)

World News

47407 readers

2211 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

693

New Zealand passes record suspension of lawmakers over haka (www.dw.com)

submitted 1 week ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

183 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The New Zealand Parliament has voted to impose record suspensions on three lawmakers who did a Maori haka as a protest. The incident took place last November during a debate on a law on Indigenous rights.

New Zealand's parliament on Thursday agreed to lengthy suspensions for three lawmakers who disrupted the reading of a controversial bill last year by performing a haka, a traditional Maori dance.

Two parliamentarians — Te Pati Maori co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi — were suspended for 21 days and one — Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, from the same party — for seven days.

Before now, the longest suspension of a parliamentarian in New Zealand was three days.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 46 points 6 days ago

Settler colonial government doing what settler colonial governments do.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago

I don't know anything about New Zealand, or Maori culture, or history, or parliamentary procedure, or the Treaty Principles Bill, or the hearings that led to this decision, or the Haka, or sociology, or anthropology, or race relations, or indigenous issues, but I think...

why don't they just have everyone do their hakas at the start, like in the rugby?

[–] Justathroughdaway@lemmy.world -5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

As someone who is half-Maori this just embarrasses me. I don't have a problem with people celebrating their heritage and culture just do it in a more appropriate time and place. I wouldn't have a problem with Irish people celebrating the Saint Patrick's Day just as long as they don't do it during a meeting at parliament.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maori lawmakers staged a dramatic protest in New Zealand's parliament on Thursday over a controversial bill that seeks to redefine the country's founding agreement between the indigenous Maori people and the British Crown.

Seems like as valid a way to protest vile revisionism and cowardly pandering to a foreign monarch.

[+] Justathroughdaway@lemmy.world -7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No it isn't. If this was on the street then it would be fine but this was a place of law and order where if you don't like something you talk about it like an adult. It was totally unprofessional and performative.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

this was a place of law and order

Clearly not, given what was being proposed. This was a legislative attempt to reneg on existing agreements between the Maori People and the British State. It was wildly illegal and provoked an appropriately outraged response.

What the legislators were protesting was the legislative equivalent of a mugging. The exact opposite of law and order. ACT New Zealand's delegates are lucky they got out of there with a bit of dancing. In other countries, that kind of blatant criminality is a hanging offense.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Where i want congress to pick up the old tradition of thowimg raw chicken at each other

[–] Justathroughdaway@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm missing out on a lot of context here.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

At keast once lawmakers started throwing raw chicken meat at each otger during a session to protest sone tarrif.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Unpopular opinion but interruption is interruption no matter the form. I do agree with the native protest here but I wouldn't read into this ruling too much as any governing body would take this position. Weak governing rule set creates these loopholes like the American filibuster which imo is a bug not a feature.

[+] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world -20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I support the suspensions. If all the other members abide by the same rules except for these ones then it makes sense reprimand them for disrupting the duties of parliament. These lawmakers were elected to be the voice of the people they represent. If they're not using their voice to explain why they oppose the bill or what their proposed alternatives are then they're not doing their job. Screaming and tearing up papers is just annoying and wasting everyone's time.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You are being downvoted because, whether you realize it or not, what you wrote is extremely racist.

These are Maori. It’s their land and their traditions, and they are being attacked for both by white, authoritarian colonists. It’s unacceptable.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

These lawmakers were elected to be the voice of the people they represent.

https://www.dw.com/en/new-zealand-42000-demonstrate-support-for-maori-rights/a-70816454

New Zealand: 42,000 demonstrate support for Maori rights

Thousands turned out despite the bill having little chance of becoming law, saying it was important to show the extent of dissent

but feel free to keep jerkin it to 'norms and civility', i suppose jagoff

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you understand that norms and civility are a requirement for a peaceful, well functioning democracy. If you see them as a nuisance then you're either an authoritarian or an idiot. Like seriously, do you think society is going to function if every self righteous politician start being obnoxious when something doesn't go their way? That braindead mentality is literally how we ended up with Trump and MAGA in the US. It is THE first pillar to fall when on your way to authoritarianism.

These politicians can support or oppose whatever they want, it's their job to do so. However, disrupting the duties of the parliament is not a part of their job, and they know that. If a couple of white politicians in New Zealand started doing berserker rituals every time something doesn't go their way in parliament, will you still be making excuses? If not, then you hold double standards and you're racist. They're the same people, in the same country, and they should abide by customs that they set for themselves. The New Zealand parliament usually has 120, 117 members with vastly different opinions can conduct themselves just fine, 3 can't. Those 3 got suspended.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When the Maori invade england and start forcing their customs on the people there, then maybe you might come somewhere close to pointing out a double standard. (also, berserker brits, lol what a concept)

We don't have Trump because people started behaving poorly, we have Trump because there's been half a century of constricting living standards and a wealthy political duopoly that just doesn't care. Obama bailing out the banks rather than the people that lost their homes did more to kill civility than anything Trump has done.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

When the Maori invade england and start forcing their customs on the people there, then maybe you might come somewhere close to pointing out a double standard.

But the framing is wrong. If Maori invaded Britain 250 years ago and over time, the two peoples mixed and created a well run multi racial liberal democracy where all it's citizens enjoy full rights, then the same standard applies. If a couple of politicians of British origin were being obnoxious and were disrupting the duties of the parliament, and the rest of the politicians decided to suspend them for their behavior, then I would be fully in favor of that too. Being of a specific ethnicity doesn't get anyone a pass to be obnoxious.

also, berserker brits, lol what a concept

It's not a concept, it's actual history. The vikings were a big part of British history.

We don’t have Trump because people started behaving poorly, we have Trump because there’s been half a century of constricting living standards and a wealthy political duopoly that just doesn’t care. Obama bailing out the banks rather than the people that lost their homes did more to kill civility than anything Trump has done.

These two things aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, they go together hand in hand. Think about it, who focuses the most on useless shit like culture wars that are meant to stir fear and anger in people in our political landscape? It's almost always either corrupt politicians or obnoxious idiots, often times it's both. The point is that the people who are making things worse are also the people who have no manners, ethics, or morals.

load more comments