this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
897 points (99.2% liked)

196

3412 readers
2103 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 101 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It really is uncanny how Trump has managed to meet basically every single criteria for being the antichrist. I’m not even religious, but it’s like his political strategy team read Revelations and used it as a checklist.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Okay, so... "The antichrist" is a plural nominative...it isnt one entity, and there have been several already. Trump and some of his gang are antichrist.

One of the primary criteria for antichrist is that christians cannot see them.

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Sas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

Ngl at this point i might believe that trump and his buddies purposefully prop him up to be the antichrist because of some weird obsession.

[–] Logh@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Does Christ and the Antichrist work a bit like matter? Could I just summon Jesus and put him next to Trump, would they annihilate each other

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

if someone says they are christian, they are. I look at this person and see a perfect example of a religious person.

[–] Hasherm0n@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My Dad had a saying I always really liked.

"You don't have to be a Christian to be a good person and you don't have to be a good person to call yourself a Christian."

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

not being a christian is a great shortcut to being a better person.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Stalin, Ghengis Khan, Pol Pot, etc. Shortcuts can lead to cliffs.
I'm not suggesting that there aren't some terrible, terrible Christians out there too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Leaving the church is one of the more Christian things one can do

[–] p3n@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I would say that before you can become a Christian you first have to realize that you aren't a good person, but if you call yourself a Christian and say you are a good person, you are neither.

"Here is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners—of whom I am the worst." — 1 Timothy 1:15, NIV

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

James 2

14 What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? 15 Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. 16 If one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? 17 In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

Matthew 6

5 “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. 6 But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. 7 And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. 8 Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I guess I'm kind of getting rude here, but why do all the women get evil looking and hardened once they work for the trump administration? It's not age but like Cruella type stuff.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The dark side of the force does weird shit to a mafk

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the duck link 🦆👍

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

They were hired for it the same way you never see a fat woman working at a bar where the waitresses wear a skimpy outfit. They are hiring disney villains.

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not just Trump. People age in every single administration. You're the head of a mafia, the Yankee cartel. Like, it's probably stressful regardless if you have good or bad intentions.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I'm talking about the women specifically. They have a look very soon after they start.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If you're asking why the side of her face melted? Drugs.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My brain is just now upon seeing this post processing why right-wingers always accuse the left of virtue signaling; as always with conservatives, it's projection. They virtue signal by wearing crosses while definitely not giving a hoot about the teachings of Jesus.

They can't imagine someone sincerely supporting a cause they care about and assume we all only do it for recognition among our peers, because that's the way they use causes. To signal to the in-group that we are one of them.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they dont call it virtue signalling, they call it woke.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Virtue signaling, political correctness, woke, they've used a bunch of terms over the years and I don't doubt they'll eventually move on from woke to another term they use to mock anyone with empathy.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

they still use woke, VS used by other than conservative most of the time. woke is primarily used by cons, and cons pretending to be on the other side.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This comment connects the dots so incredibly well compared with what I see from my angry conservative family.

They can't imagine someone sincerely supporting a cause they care about and assume we all only do it for recognition among our peers, because that's the way they use causes. To signal to the in-group that we are one of them.

Fuuuck, that is exactly the mindset I was raised to have, and which I very much had during my angry teenage years. Fortunately that was a long-ass time ago and in the decades since I’ve had everything from college to the internet to let me consider the thoughts and arguments of other less angry/hateful/bigoted/sociopathic people.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

My parents are pretty hippy-dippy granola types who have regularly volunteered for our local Green Party, so I'm obviously coming at this from a different perspective than you. I like to think I'd have ended up at the same conclusions I have even if I grew up with super conservative parents, but I'd probably be pretty different.

So props to you for doing the hard work of detaching yourself from those mindsets. Of course, we all absorb some bullshit through society at large (heck I even remember, when I was just a kid, my dad making occasional "jokes" about how Indigenous people here in Canada "were lazy and got everything for free". And my dad is rather progressive for his peer group).

But I can only imagine it must be so much harder to detach yourself from that if your family is completely immersed into the kind of rhetoric the right has been pushing for years now.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Religion is the true cancer of society. MAGA is the side effects of that cancer. Makes sense because most MAGA are highly religious.

[–] froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 week ago

Any ideology raised to fanatism is dangerous. Tankies are usually atheists

[–] riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i disagree. i think spirituality can be amazing and make life and good values even more complete.

i see issues in hierarchies, domination, and hate. not all religion but probably all dominat religion.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Christianity was a fabulous anti-establishment death cult that taught there was no higher honor than being gruesomely murdered by the state for loudly proclaiming their inadequacies. Then the council of Nicaea happened and they BECAME the establishment aaaand... My conversion to Gnosticism of going fabulous thank you for asking. It's not OG flavor Christianity if you're not actually being persecuted!

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seriously I have come to find blonde women grossly unattractive and its because of Fox News and this motherfucker.

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I found that one pissed off rant from a Young Turks journalist where’s she’s angrily saying “I DONT CARE WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS” to be very attractive. I literally know nothing else about her and she could be a horrible person, but that moment of righteous indignation really had an effect on me

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Is this the new handmaiden outfit?

[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Untrue. Christianity is self-proclaimed. This "real Christian" bullshit is apologetic nonsense, just like "the devil made fossils."

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

As an atheist raised roman catholic, I disagree.

There are rules and tenets and ideals of the religion. It's not about meeting them, but it is about wanting to and more strictly attempting to.

It's not even a no true Scotsman fallacy, because there's a book no flavor of Christianity I know of openly rejects while claiming to be Christian, even if they have adendums like the book of Mormon. The rules are defined.

They aren't only not trying to live up to those rules and ideals, they aren't only just paying them lip service, they are actively, jubilantly, and studiously undermining and working against the most belabored edicts of their belief system without end and calling that Christianity.

Cheering for the torture of the meek, demanding cruelty upon people from foreign lands and calling oneself Christian, ie Jesus of Nazareth as written in the New Testament, is like claiming to be an academic because you burn a book every morning and brag about how illiterate you are.

"What you have to know how to read and... read books instead of burning them to be an academic?" Actually yes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

People demanding sources for basically a shitpost. Wow.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago
[–] plyth@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

~~It makes sense if she means to diss people with tattoos.~~

~~She says "can turn" in comparison to "doesn't". That comparison is not balanced.~~

I thought this was a quote.

As an observation, it is literally right. There is 'Christian' as a path of spiriitual growth and 'Christian' as a gang. That golden cross is a gang symbol and works as such. Spiritually it would be wooden. Golden, it shows membership of the Christian gang.

Tattoos work in the same way. Japanese know and treat them accordingly. At the very least tattoos of normal people make gang membership less despicable. If everybody marks themselves as non-normal, society changes.

This is not an argument against tattoos. They are just more than a fashion symbol, while those can already be spiritually influential, as many women on diets can attest.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

I think there's a distinction between what some ignorant people think of as "tattoos that signify gang membership" (i.e. literally any tattoo) and literal gang tattoos.

[–] ThraawnSolo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

That photo on the right reminds me of Syril Karn...

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Are those the same person? Lol I never realized how much they look alike.

load more comments
view more: next ›