peace out
Spend their retirement calling the cafeteria staff at Luby’s racial slurs and saying trans kids and drag queens are evil.
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
Related communities:
peace out
Spend their retirement calling the cafeteria staff at Luby’s racial slurs and saying trans kids and drag queens are evil.
And voting for people that will make everyone's life hell and ensure that no one else will ever get to experience the quality of life that they did.
Not to sound ageist, but I firmly believe voting privileges should be revoked when you retire.
If you need to wait 18 years to vote you shouldn't be able to vote once you are 18 years from average life expectancy (as in life expectancy is 80, you can vote until you're 62, not after).
Imagine how much focus would be put on healthcare if that were the case...
I'm at least relieved to not have lead poisoning, for my gay brother to be safely out, and for my interracial marriage to not be scorned by the community.
Honestly, at this point I'm just waiting for trump to bring back leaded gas.
Yet.
What about Korea, Bay of Pigs, Vietnam and the fact that ptsd was treated with electrical shocks or drilling holes in your brain
Also constant threat of global nuclear annihilation
That hasn't gone anywhere though although the media doesn't keep drumming about it as much I guess
Also lead in the air
Would have been nice if younger folks had voted in their own interests.
Stating the raw value of the house will only make naysayers throw inflation into your face.
The better way of saying that would be,
buy a detached SFH for only 4× annual minimum wage
Like, really drive it home how absolutely unaffordable homes are these days. In my corner of Canada, the median detached SFH is going for 28× minimum wage, and it’s 32× if it’s new construction. My own 1972 split level sold brand-new for only 4× the 1972 minimum wage.
Jesus in today money that's 60k for a house. For a nice hours our parents bought
A quick way of estimating annual wage for a full-time position is to take hourly, double it, then move the decimal point to the right by three spots.
So for example, the BC minimum wage is $17.40. Double that is $34.80. Annually in a full-time job, that’s about $34,800 before taxes.
And 4× that is $139,200. Current median SFH prices for used homes sit at just under $1M in my podunk tourist town. All detached SFH, $1,200,000. New construction, $1,500,000.
I mean, really - who under 50 can actually afford those prices without intergenerational wealth to give them a leg up in life?
You can throw the inflation right back at them. Boomers were born into the Bretton Woods system, started borrowing from us in the 1970s, and then kept voting for lower taxes on the wealthy.
Old people used to complain about inflation frequently because they experienced a stable dollar for decades... until the Nixon Shock.
We're a 1950's 91% top-tier tax rate away from the same.
It's amazing how often this gets mentioned. In truth almost nobody paid that tax rate because it applied only to salaries. Rich people have always gotten most of their income from capital gains (which were taxed at a low rate in the 1950s, just like today).
It applies to income, not salaries, and it applies to corporate income as well as personal income. Nobody needs to pay it for it to achieve its purpose. Indeed, nobody should be paying it, ever.
You have a choice. I'll give you $900 for you to do anything you want with. Alternatively, I'll give you $10,000, but you can only spend it on something that you can convince me is something you need for your business.
You can buy $900 of GOOG, or you can spend $10,000 on a bunch of electronics. You can buy $900 of AAPL, or spend $10,000 "entertaining clients" at a strip club.
You can buy $900 worth of stocks, or purchase goods and services produced by workers.
Nobody is taking the $900 here. Everyone is taking the $10,000. Nobody is paying 91% on $10,000 over the line. You can get much more value from your large "business" spending than you can get from your small investment.
Now, if the numbers are $6300 on anything, or $10,000 on business, a lot of people are going to take the $6300. This is a top-tier of 37%.
$7500 on anything, or $10,000 on business, most people are going to take the $7500. This is a top-tier of 25%.
The 91% tax rate isn't for the government to spend more money. The 91% tax rate is to ensure the richest among us get greater value from hiring workers than they do from buying securities.
Yeah, my mother was able to earn a bachelor's degree (iirc? either that or an associates), paying for it by working as a cashier at McDonalds.
The fucking eighties, man.
My anger as I approach my thirties, unable to afford college even when I was working full time (before I lost my job), can not be overstated.
Also flying to Vietnam for a government paid vacation when they were 18 years old.
Shhhh, the primary social media population wants to believe life was a breeze until they came along.
There was no oil crisis, no cold war, no economic crash in the 80s, no housing shortage in the 80s, no rampant crime!
The 70/80s where glorious!
/Sssss
We didn't start the fire
And then bitch and moan when anything doesn't go absolutely perfectly in their favor.
Shoutout to our parents for hitting an absolute timeline sweet-spot. Drop in right after a world war, have a bunch of weird sex before HIV, buy a house for like 20.000€, start a family, retire young and peace out right before the ocean kills us.
They should be called generation G for hitting that sweet spot.
I don't blame old people, they lived the best of times, their lives were comfortable because they were in a boom. They had high hopes, had kids with a bright future in mind for them, but things change, some see it, others are oblivious to it.
I 100% blame them for pulling the ladder up behind them.
If the roles switched we'd probably do the same.
Yeah, no. Speak for yourself please.
I already have so much less opportunity than the average boomer, and I'm still not doing that. Because I'm not a piece of shit. It's really not difficult.
It's still fair to blame them. Old people blame young people for everything afterall.
My parents don't, well not completely. They know the world be screwed up, but they also think there's a degree of responsibility on my part too. We are all stuck in this shit show together, and old people thought they'd be dead long before it got really really bad, but Trump SA'd the money, and now we all get to suffer.
I'd keep friends and loved ones close.
Spend all of their own parents inheritance, leave nothing for their own kids, talk about how they had to work their way up from nothing.
https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/voting-and-registration/p20-370.html
https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-1980
Boomers weren't the ones who elected Reagan, they were at most 35 at the time.
That's the president that started to fuck things up and it was just the same as usual, older people being more conservative, younger people not showing up to vote.
Both your links gave me 404 errors
They were almost all able to vote in 1980 at 16- 34, and made up a large portion of the population then in 84 they were all able to vote and saw what actions he took the previous election and voted for him more…
Copypaste for you:
1980 | Group | Carter | Reagan | Anderson | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | All Voters | Pct. | 41% | 51% | 8% | |
SEX | Men | 51 | 38 | 55 | 7 | |
Women | 49 | 46 | 47 | 7 | ||
RACE | White | 88 | 36 | 56 | 8 | |
African-American | 10 | 83 | 14 | 3 | ||
Hispanic | 2 | 56 | 37 | 7 | ||
AGE | 18-21 | 6 | 45 | 44 | 11 | |
22-29 | 17 | 44 | 44 | 11 | ||
30-44 | 31 | 38 | 55 | 7 | ||
45-59 | 23 | 39 | 55 | 6 | ||
60 & over | 18 | 41 | 55 | 4 | ||
INCOME | <$10,000 | 13 | 52 | 42 | 6 | |
$10 -14,999 | 14 | 48 | 43 | 8 | ||
$15-24,999 | 30 | 39 | 54 | 7 | ||
$25-50,000 | 24 | 33 | 59 | 8 | ||
>$50,000 | 5 | 26 | 66 | 8 | ||
UNION HOUSEHOLD | Yes | 26 | 48 | 45 | 7 | |
No | 62 | 36 | 56 | 8 | ||
REGION | East | 32 | 44 | 48 | 8 | |
Midwest | 20 | 42 | 52 | 6 | ||
South | 27 | 45 | 52 | 3 | ||
West | 11 | 36 | 54 | 10 | ||
PARTY | Democrat | 43 | 67 | 27 | 6 | |
Republican | 28 | 11 | 85 | 4 | ||
Independent | 23 | 31 | 56 | 13 | ||
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY | Liberal | 17 | 60 | 28 | 1 | |
Moderate | 46 | 43 | 49 | 8 | ||
Conservative | 28 | 23 | 73 | 4 |
Notes: Survey by CBS News and the New York Times. Sample of 15,201 voters as they left voting booths on Election Day, November 4, 1980. “Don’t know” and “other” responses not included.
I would still take my life over my mom's. Things were not good for women back then.
Things can always backslide
What I like about this is that it doesn’t pretend boomers are uniquely evil, just the generation that got lucky.
Except that's not really the full truth either. The generation got lucky AND systemically burned every thing down so that they were the only ones left with all the benefits that luck provided.