this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
114 points (99.1% liked)

Europe

5828 readers
980 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Incoming German Chancellor Friedrich Merz suffered an embarrassing setback when he fell short of a majority in an initial vote in the lower house of parliament, potentially delaying his swearing-in as head of government due to take place later on Tuesday.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

For more context:

Both parties together have a majority and coaltion talks have already been done. If every single party member votes yes, this should be no problem. In theory.

This result shows how massively unpopular Merz really is, going down in history as a failure BEFORE he even got a chance to fuck up at his actual job.

He will probably be voted in during the second (or even third) round, but this may sow discontent and suspicion in the parties. The vote was anonymous, so you cant easily figure out who broke the line, potentially leading to poisoning the coalition.

Either way, we now have Friedrich "Zweite Wahl" Merz

Edit: Spelling

[–] Vincent 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Do you know what makes people say he will probably be voted in in a later round? We don't really know anything about why coalition party members voted against, right? Is it just that a reasonable explanation is that people wanted to keep him on his toes, but that's that?

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Two reasons. First, the required majority can be lowered to vote him in with a simple majority, if no absolute majority can be achieved (this will not happen right away). Second, the members who broke rank probably only wanted to send a message, so it's likely that they'll change their vote back to the party line (this may happen fairly soon).

[–] Vincent 3 points 3 days ago

Ah right, that makes sense, thanks! (Thanks to the other repliers as well.)

For the second round he would once again require 316 "yes"-votes (50% +1 vote) of the entire parliament. It's possible that the first round was intended as a warning since cdu and SPD have a majority.

In a third round he would only need the majority of votes the MPs that are present during the vote.

[–] ardorhb@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Because there a "phases" for the election of the chancellor. The first one just failed. We are now in the second one where the parlament can vote again (once or as many times as they like) if Merz isn't elected after 14 days we will enter phase 3.

The big difference then beeing the needed majority changing from absolute to relative. Merz already had the relativ majority in this first round so it is more or less sure that he will get at least this numbers and will get elected at this point.

In theory this "relative win" could then be vetoed by the federal president but again unlikely with Steinmeier (SPD and big advocate of Union + SPD governments) being in this position.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oof. First time this happened in German history. He'll probably get voted in in the 2nd or 3rd vote, but this sure sets the tone for the new government.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Worst possible outcome would be if in the 2nd vote he gets a majority that shows all of the AfD voted for him, too.
Especially since he already did a back room deal to get their support in a vote before.

No one would believe him when he says he didn't make a deal with them.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 9 points 3 days ago

Also see the Thuringen government crisis, where AfD, CDU and FDP voted together to topple the former state minister president in favor of a guy from the FDP that only made it into parliament by a dozen votes.

So it has precedent that the AfD will vote to enable an unpopular candidate in order to mock the representative democracy.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 25 points 3 days ago
[–] Melchior@feddit.org 16 points 3 days ago
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

First AfD is officially acknowledged of being far right extremist now this? Dare I say weβ€˜re on a roll after a really shitty election?

[–] superkret@feddit.org 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

On a roll downhill, maybe.
If the AfD votes for Merz in the second round, the parlament will probably dissolve into chaos very quickly.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I donβ€˜t have a crystal ball but I donβ€˜t think that will happen because of the chance it could really enable Merz and split the AfD more than it splits the rest. It could show that Merz has the Bundestag under control after all and thatβ€˜s the last thing the AfD needs right now.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In my opinion it would show the opposite.
All parties except for the AfD would think he did a secret deal with them.
Because he already did such a deal with the AfD against the last administration.
So he'd be technically chancellor, the AfD would applaud and laugh sarcastically, and he'd have lost the trust of all his allies.

[–] alleycat@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I don't think that this will happen. The Afd was already propagandising heavily against the CDU and Merz, it wouldn't fit their narrative.

Edit: Afd just said they'll vote for Merz. Guess I was wrong.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And secret deals with Merz make the AfD seem reliable, trustworthy and strong, how? If anything that would strengthen the left.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The AfD doesn't need to seem reliable, trustworthy and strong.
Like Trump, they thrive on chaos and a loss of trust in democracy itself.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Well I guess now we can say almost certainly that none of them voted for him the second time around either which was predictable.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Semi-related, but maybe interesting.

Tuesday's vote was held on the eve of the 80th anniversary of Germany's unconditional surrender in World War II. The ballots are secret and cast in the restored Reichstag.

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/05/06/friedrich-merz-s-bid-to-become-germany-s-10th-chancellor-fails-first-vote_6740970_4.html

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 days ago
[–] adry@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Coalition talks were sh*t? no surprise. I bet majority of those votes were from AfD :P

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Nah, they hate compromises and voting for anyone who isn’t in their party is by definition a compromise. Also the bigger the shit show the better for them. Actively sabotaging any process always works in their favor. Especially here. Sudden reelections would be the perfect gift to them now to get around a ban of their party and this makes that a little more likely.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

See the Thuringen government crisis, where AfD, CDU and FDP voted together to topple the former state minister president in favor of a guy from the FDP that only made it into parliament by a dozen votes.

It has precedent that the AfD will vote to enable an unpopular candidate in order to mock the representative democracy.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Fair point. An unpopular FDP politician is probably a lot easer to control than a Merz though. This was definitely a calculated move. Especially since the AfD is very strong in Thuringia anyway. They are a lot weaker in der Bundestag still so they will likely oppose any candidate the CDU brings forward right now.

[–] genfood@feddit.org -1 points 3 days ago