this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
540 points (99.1% liked)

memes

14737 readers
3244 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lime@feddit.nu 120 points 1 week ago (2 children)

man you guys need unions

here it's minimum two months notice by law, usually three by contract, increasing by one month per every five years. and you can basically only get fired for actively sabotaging business, doing illegal shit, or if there legitimately is nothing for you to do. and they still have to pay you for the entire time. like, i worked at a company that went bankrupt and after the estate or whatever it's called ran out of cash, the state paid out the final month.

flipside: it goes the other way too.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Have you no love for the shareholders who have invested their ill-gotten gains in these enterprises?!

Have you no decency?!

[–] lime@feddit.nu 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i am a shareholder. buying shares is only open to people working in the company. you have to sell them back when you leave.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

Damn. Mic drop. Very nice.

[–] ivanovsky@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Other way meaning you have to give 2+ month notice to quit?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yes. except for the first few months (usually the first half-a-year) when both parties can terminate the employment within one month.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well, my colleagues all knew in the day I was laid off in the morning before me. I only knew about it after it being announced in the afternoon because it was a day off for me. It was fun. People coming to say goodbye and me having no idea what they were talking.

[–] Fabian@lemmy.zip 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds shitty. Why do companies do that?

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Let them go on Friday so they have the weekend to cool off. Minimises problematic post employment events.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 72 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

it's better for everyone if you negotiate layoffs and firings beforehand. No surprises and everyone gets their day in court. That is how the union system works in Sweden.

American MBAs and HR managers are too cowardly to have tough discussions with their employees.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago

Ah but you see, success is clearly a zero sum game. Even if the company is worse off than otherwise, if they fuck over their employees more than they’re fucking themselves over, it’s still a win.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

I was fired with no warning in the middle of the day on a Tuesday. Turns out I was the fall guy when the department had to cut costs because all the projects the director was coming up with to save money were actually costing the place more to implement. They said I wasn't good enough, but my one buddy there told me my work was just fine.

Gave me some bad self-esteem issues that I'm still working on years later, but I did get a WAY better job 4 days after being fired. Last I heard they've gone through 5 people trying to fill in my position after they realized they needed me.

[–] FoolishObserver@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Someone's had a talk with The Bobs.

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 week ago

I remember one past job when the company decided on a Friday to let someone go but thought it was best to wait until Monday morning to give them the news. Then he started the day and immediately got sacked.

[–] WoolyNelson@lemmy.world 82 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I remember being the server guy who had to stay late on Fridays and remove access at 6pm.

I got a panicked call from someone who couldn't save the file he was working on. It was for a project set to go live on Tuesday.

I had to break it to him that he was just let go.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That fucking sucks, for both you and him.

Who doesn’t even bother to tell someone that?

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In many companies access is removed before they're notified so vengeful employees can't go in and fuck things up right after being terminated.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't be surprised if this was mandatory under cybersecurity insurance. Logic bombs are a bitch.

[–] WoolyNelson@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

With my access in my last job, I could have crippled the company with 5 minutes notice.

It's horribly passive-aggressive, but it is safest for the company.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Man I've been there too. You do exactly what HR asks you to, when they ask you to do it and all of a sudden it's "oh whoops that's actually supposed to be next week)

Or like the meme says, it sucks when you get an email telling you to term someone at the end of the week and you have to interact with them all week.

[–] WoolyNelson@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My brother was on the list of names once.

I was not allowed to tell him, but HR let me take off that day and had someone else do it.

[–] kevin2107@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I would have told him. At that point its blood over whatever the fuck you think corporate is.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 68 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I worked on a 6 month project. At month 5, they said they are not renewing even tho they need the position.

My team fought the VP and said if I don't continue it would be detrimental to the project.

She renews me for another 6 months and makes me fly to an off-site to present at an mbr.

The VP proceeds to cancel my contract the day I land in San Francisco. Because she doesn't want a remote worker anymore and wants this person to come in 4 days a week.

Corporate doesn't care about you. You need to be selfish because nobody will care about you otherwise.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sorry you dealt with that, an I'm very familiar with it. You're absolutely right, to management you are nothing more than a drone. It doesn't matter how important you are to the company, what level you are, once they have decided you're out it's over. There is no amount of fighting, rallying, or anything you can do. They will find a way to oust you.

Same applies if you're in an HR thing, a legal thing, just got on someone's bad side. Even if you win, they'll just fabricate a reason to get rid of you with just enough data to justify it in court. As soon as you catch wind, start looking for your next place

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

I have been jaded enough that I'm sort of numb to it now. I'm only working towards my retirement. Office gossip, dynamics, culture means nothing to me. 90% of my job is optics. The rest is real work. My only job is to try and keep my job as long as possible and nothing more.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 64 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Anyone else dislike the phrase "let go" in this context? It sounds like you're doing them a favor, or they were being held hostage, or giving them permission to do something. I'd prefer "fired" or "terminated", even though those have their own connotation problems.

Meme's relatable, though. This capitalist hellscape is awful.

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The phrase "let go" is definitely PR speak. It makes it sound less aggressive than "fired" or "terminated".

I have heard arguments that "fired" has the implication that the employee is at fault and did something bad, but the argument is weak.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have heard arguments that "fired" has the implication that the employee is at fault

Generally that's not an implication, it is the outright meaning. America is weird on that because you guys can be fired without cause; in the civilized world you're either fired (at fault), laid off (no work for you to do), or terminated with severance pay (because you're not at fault, but it also isn't a layoff).

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Laid off would still mean severance pay in the civilized world. In my country it's either a layoff or a firing. I don't think you can do a termination without it being one of the two. What's the difference? Well with a layoff, even if you pay the employee their severance and everything... You can't just hire a new person to fill the role. The role needs to actually disappear for a while at least.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 week ago

True. Saying you got fired sounds like you fucked up. Maybe "dismissed" is more neutral without being totally PR Speak?

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I used to think that there was a big difference between being "let go" and being "fired", in terms of what actually happens.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you're in a country with good worker protection, there's a big difference between 'made redundant' and 'fired for cause'. There is no 'fired for no reason'.

[–] ZeroGravitas@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hint: only one of these comes with a so-called golden handshake.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 week ago

Redundancy doesn't necessarily come with a golden handshake, though many employment contracts do mandate it.

But they do have to try to find you another job elsewhere in the organisation if that's possible, and they have to disestablish the position not necessarily you. That means that if they want to make one person from a team redundant, they generally have to actually ask if anyone wants to leave, and if not, run a transparent process to decide who from the team to make redundant, not just pick someone.

You also have to not be planning to re-hire for the role any time soon as that would imply the redundancy wasn't genuine.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IT also often shares the burden of knowledge...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jecht360@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I once had HR and my boss tell me to disable a user's account at 8am because they were going to fire this woman. 8:30 rolls around and she shows up, super upset she can't sign into anything. I tell her I'll see what I can find, thinking that will delay the inevitable.

Nope. Her team lead took another two hours before he could be bothered to get to her. When I asked everyone what I should say to the increasingly stressed woman, I was told I should lie and say that there's a domain controller issue.

They finally got around to firing her and she gave me the worst look on her way out the door. She definitely had it coming for some of the stuff she did, like stealing an entire Thanksgiving turkey meant to share with the whole company. But that is probably the worst moment I've had in my IT career so far.

Now if someone tells me to pull a stunt like that I just say no. They need to figure out their plan instead of forcing IT to lie.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You were asked to be a total asshole and you complied.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In the company's defense, stealing an entire turkey is Lex Luthor levels of villainy.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I think it's also worth bearing in mind that he was told to by his bosses as part of his job. I understand it would be nice to let her know, but risking your employment (and therefore your income, home, healthcare, etc.), is a bad idea. Unfortunately I think OP was caught behind a rock and a hard place. The blame here falls on management, as it usually does, not on OP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You should automate it so when the HR system fires someone the AD or Entra accounts are disabled and licenses are removed.

But yea, it is the shit part.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Oh it is, but I still get notified ahead of time jic, especially since we're (mostly) remote, so there's no security approaching their desk if the network glitches and misses locking them out of Windows or some shit lol

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

Sure, but those don’t trigger until the term becomes effective.

[–] WoolyNelson@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I remembered a worse time (than being the one who kills access):

One of my vendors had won the contract that my company currently held with an automaker. It was told to me in confidence, as they thought it was going to be announced later that month. I was also told because they were looking to hire me to keep all the day-to-day knowledge.

It was finally announced... EIGHT. MONTHS. LATER.

While I never said anything (it could have tucked a major deal and got myself and a few others in legal hot water), I was always quick to counsel my underlings to move to other positions or get jobs somewhere else.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All Middle Managers Are Bastards

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't go that far, but it's probably most. I've had a few middle managers that were good, less than 5 though.

I couldn't do it. I'd have shot him a text from my personal phone. The fact that I couldn't do that is probably why I've never even thought of trying to apply for a job like that.

load more comments
view more: next ›