this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
1706 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

7927 readers
1764 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I used to pay $1100 for a 3 bedroom apartment 10 years ago, now a 2 bedroom is $2600+

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Having taken the point of this post as it was intended, we can also recognize that learning how to manage your money is in fact always a good thing. Will basic hygiene undo generations of economics? No, but we certainly shouldn’t NOT teach young people to manage their money.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody on earth has suggested we stop teaching economic literacy. We should however stop pretending it is sufficient. We require systemic change.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I think there's a suggestion we start teaching it. I'm 37, but there were idiots who didn't understand credit cards when I was 18, and there's just as many now, and there were just as many in 1995. I think this response thread here was meant to say yes, understanding the system is fucked, even if we come out on the other side with a functional economy, people still need to learn some personal responsibility when it comes to spending.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 21 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

There's a famous Agatha Christie quote where she mentions that when she was young, she never imagined she'd be rich enough to own an automobile or poor enough to not have servants in her house. At some point, the affordability of one shot way past the other.

In my lifetime, I've seen huge cost increases in housing, and huge cost decreases in most technological products. When I was a kid, the normal TV size was something like 20 inches, and cost more than a month's rent for a typical apartment. In 1990, the average rent was $447, according to this. I found a Sears catalog from 1989 with a 25 inch TV selling for $549, and a 20 inch TV for $318. It would be hard to convince someone from 1990 that one day the cheapest, shittiest apartments in the poorest neighborhoods would rent for more than a 60-inch TV per month. Or that the typical ambulance ride costs something like a month's salary of a factory worker.

That's the real problem with old people's sense of money. The human tendency is to assume that all products cost the same multiple of those products prices in their early adulthood, so the luxury products of their youth remain the luxury products of today. These old people are stuck in some kind of Agatha Christie style of cost comparison, without the self awareness, and thinking that someone who owns a cell phone should be able to afford to buy a single family detached house, or couldn't possibly be bankrupted by a single Emergency Room visit.

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Please stop blaming “old people”. It’s a divide and conquer tactic. I have grown children that are struggling with housing costs, and I absolutely understand why. Because greedy wealthy people/corporations are buying up all the property. If “old people” are pulling the avocado toast argument—they’re probably wealthy. Young wealthy people use the same argument. Something to think about regarding TVs. They were expensive back in the day, but they lasted 30+ years. ✌️ ☮️

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

It is absolutely OK to assign accurate blame and this basic misunderstanding absolutely afflicts people who aren't rich. The kind of person who bought their house when it's cheap and thinks the $2000 they pay in property taxes per year are murderous whilst ignoring the fact that folks around them are paying $2000 a month in rent.

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

I don’t know where you live, but property taxes are sky rocketing as well. And, thanks to global warming, house insurance is also sky rocketing. A lot of people who own their home are facing difficulties. There are communities in British Columbia where insurance companies refuse to offer fire coverage. There are communities in British Columbia where insurance companies refuse to offer flood insurance. These same insurance companies used to. You know why they won’t now?? Because the Oligarchs own the insurance companies, and they know what’s coming.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Please stop blaming “old people”.

I'm not "blaming" anyone. I'm pointing out the mechanism that causes a portion of old people to be out of touch on these things. They rely on their own experiences to draw inferences that don't actually apply to others.

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"That’s the real problem with old people’s sense of money”. That is blaming old people.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"Blame" means to attribute for some negative result. There's no assigning fault here, just an observation, and an explanation behind that observation.

If I said "Bob is a fucking idiot," that's not blaming Bob for anything.

So yeah, I stand by my explanation behind the observation in OP's screenshot: that people tend to draw on past experiences even when those experiences are no longer as relevant, or are even actively misleading. And that the phenomenon I describe (that not all prices inflate at the same rate or preserve the same ratios to each other) exacerbates the problem.

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

OK. I’m seeing “the real problem with old people”. So, de facto, there’s a problem with old people.

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I totally agree with you that this is true, but I think it’s more a problem with reactionary thinking than anything else. The way I see it, the type of thinking that leads to reactionary comments is individualistic solutions to social and economic problems because you’re not allowed to question affordability.

People of all ages pull this shit. I can’t count how many times some millennial on reddit made unwanted suggestions for a poor person’s budgeting or grocery purchases. It is obviously difficult for older folks to understand things they’re not experiencing, but I don’t think that’s the primary issue.

Ask any traitor lunatic under 40 what to do about high prices, they’ll tell you exactly.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I definitely see this a lot. Any time someone complains about the unaffordability of life you get a swarm of people prying into their personal details desperately trying to figure out how that person's situation is their own fault.

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Exactly. I never want to hear from someone making >$300,000 that I should be eating lentils all week.

[–] CulturedLout@lemmy.ca 21 points 12 hours ago

We had to give up entirely on affording a house. There are ROOMS for rent at $1200 here. This used to be a low COL area until COVID. We had low infection rates so a ton of people moved here and we don't have the infrastructure to support them. We've been priced out of what living space we did have and since there's still the illusion it's cheap to live here, it's almost impossible to get a living wage.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 12 points 14 hours ago

All CEOs are bastards or something

load more comments
view more: next ›