this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
176 points (97.8% liked)

politics

23099 readers
3308 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 105 points 4 days ago (3 children)

"It was malpractice on the side of Harvard’s lawyers not to pick up the phone and call the members of the antisemitism task force who they had been talking to for weeks,” said May Mailman, the White House senior policy strategist. “Instead, Harvard went on a victimhood campaign.”

So blaming the victim.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 57 points 4 days ago

“We didn’t mean to send you that stupid letter, it was so so stupid, you should have known it was stupid when we sent it to you.”

  • “That sounds like a you problem”
  • “So if we’d agreed you would have said never mind don’t worry about it forget all that?”
  • “Apology accepted. Contact us if you need anything else”
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 38 points 4 days ago (1 children)

donvict went sky high on the 'demands-, looking for, and expecting, a quick and 'voluntary' settlement from harvard to avoid some of it.

instead, the wind blew his piss right back at him.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Just wanted to say that this is the first time I've seen "Donvict," and my buddy who calls him tRumpus is gonna love it.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's a very unprofessional claim for the administration to make.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 13 points 4 days ago

Let's hope incompetence prevails over the pure evilness of what they're actually trying to do in all aspects.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 80 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This is what I've gathered so far.

Trump Admin: "remove your DEI programs and stop your students from protesting"

Harvard: "...no."

Trump Admin: "we'll pull your funding."

Harvard: "... Aight."

Trump Admin: "we'll also remove your immigrant students visas and dig into your old tax files to make sure you're not hiding anything like the un-American, unpatriotic, loser school you are!"

Harvard: "...k."

Trump Admin: "...!"

Harvard: "..."

Trump Admin: "... Hey actually that letter was not meant for you. Someone sent that and they weren't supposed to."

Harvard: "... Okay... You might want to address that."

Trump Admin: "Stop being so whiny and acting like a child about it. Get over it."

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 23 points 4 days ago

They said the letter was meant to be sent eventually.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fuck whatever Trump officials might say before or after the fact. Watch what they do, that's all that matters.. they'll say whatever they need to.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This should be the rule from now on .... whatever stupidity the administration announces ... everyone ignores and just go about with business as usual

If they want to arrest or force people to do things, let them ... fight them every step of the way on everything

But also don't forget to shoot their third Reich goons as soon as you need to.

[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Seems like they called Trump's bluff and he folded?

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 33 points 4 days ago (3 children)

harvard has money. lots of money.. and alumni. lots of smart, powerful, wealthy alumni.. he caved quicker than the front wheel assembly of a cybersuck.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Their endowment as it sits essentially allows them to operate for something like a decade without any external money. And you can guarantee they'll get a bump in alumni donations if external funding is removed like that.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago

It's not just Harvard though, even if they're taking the lead and getting the headlines

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I believe their endowment sits somewhere around $50 billion. They could definitely float for a few years until Trump is out of office.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Everyone needs to learn from China and Harvard: Just know that you're better than the repubs and their bullshit, act like it, and don't bat an eye at their crazy demands. They'll fold like the cheap suits they wear.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 4 days ago

that works if you have power… if you don’t have power, they’ll make an example out of you

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago

If the Trump/Musk administration actually folded, they'd:

  • Restore all funding
  • Continue with additional grants for research on the basis of merit, per historical practice
  • Stop trying to deport students, staff, and faculty

I don't see any of those happening yet; just trying to pass blame to lower-ranking officials.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I've said it once and I'll say it again.

Harvard has more capital than they know what to do with. They're busy literally buying up land in Cambridge, Allston/Brighton, playing modern day Roman Empire in the middle of a Capital US city.

You cannot threaten Harvard with capital.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The Narcissist's Prayer

That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.

by Dayna Craig

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

This right here. It's madness that this is what it's coming to

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 16 points 4 days ago
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Bullshit. I think it's Elon, going for maximum chaos. DOGE has inserted itself into all the government IT systems, I bet he saw this go through internally and made sure it got sent to Harvard from someone's legit email address just to force things.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 4 days ago

Translation: We thought we were gonna threaten them and they’d comply. They didn’t flinch, we feel silly, this was never the plan.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

IF YOU MAKE ME LAUGH HARDER I WILL CUM.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

(china taking trade notes...)

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Obama ('s alma mater) 1, trump 0

So. Much. Winning.