Should still be ready for the eventuality that he tries to impose martial law, just like what happened in Korea recently
this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
119 points (99.2% liked)
politics
23087 readers
3577 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It is not an eventuality, it is a possibility that he tries
Thinking that everything is 100% certain to happen is how we get ourselves too paralyzed to act. We can reduce the odds of many things from happening by showing up and building pressure
Join protests, boycotts, strikes, etc.
EDIT: or maybe I apparently have misunderstood how the word eventuality is supposed to be a synonymy of possibility. My bad on that one
Even if the probability is less than 100% it is a good idea to prepare while there's still time to do so. Its not about paralysis, its about emergency preparedness and taking necessary precautions.
Such as?
Here are some examples that come to mind:
- Having enough food/water/essentials to make it through 3 days without electricity or gas (like what was recommend in Europe recently)
- having a plan of how you'll to keep in contact and meet with people you care about if there's no internet or cell service
- making sure whatever social media you use to voice dissent cannot be easily linked to your identity via email, photos, location data, etc.
Basically the same sort of disaster preparedness you would have normally, except the last bullet point
It is not an eventuality, it is a possibility that he tries
That’s literally what “eventuality” means:
eventuality | əˌvɛn(t)ʃəˈwælədi |
noun (plural eventualities)
a possible event or outcome.
Oh hmm, maybe I had just heard people misuse it in the past? Had only heard it being used as a synonym for possibility in the context of "every eventuality" but other times meaning something definitive. Looking it up I see that it's supposed to just always refer to possibility
I think people get confused because it sounds so similar to “eventually”—i.e., something bound to occur given enough time.
Found these two, which seem to cloud the issue. These don't say "possible", the first even says "eventual".
the state or fact of being eventual; contingent character
The coming as a consequence; contingency; also, an event which comes as a consequence.
An eventuality, but not inevitably
yup. they always like to bullshit before they do shit.
I’ll believe that on Monday, if it hasn’t been done by then
This is going to be a tough weekend for Trump. Things aren't going his way on quite a few fronts. Stay wary, everyone. There's always time for another meltdown and it seems the Mad King is done slinging ketchup at the walls.
So, persistent looming threat then.
Makes sense.
Sounds pretty standard these days.
The surest way to get Trump to do something is to tell him don't do it. Now this is in the cards at any time.
Too bad he didn't get killed playing with a electrical outlet as a child.
This is surprising as they are total lapdogs, perhaps indeed the pressure worked.
Remember though that trump doesn't need them to invoke the act, but having them mention he should would help with legitimacy.
Fascists also love meanings behind numbers, for example the invasion of Ukraine in 2014 and 2022 both happened on February 24.
April 19 is 250th anniversary of beginning of American Revolution (remember when President of heritage foundation talked about "bloodless revolution (if the left allows it to be)"? April 20 also has some meaning in their hearts.
Columbine, or Hitler's birthday?
4 20 blaze it
I can't imagine there's not already a court ready to slap them with an injunction on the grounds that a "foreign invasion" is not a "domestic insurrection".
They’re waiting, biding their time. It’s too soon. But in 3 months it might be a different story.
Imagine there’s a meter and the needle needs to be more than way to begin operation absolute control. Think Palpatine and dissolving the senate.
They are speedrunning it mind, they are not a patient group and they have revealed their hand by accident several times. The Zelenskyy meeting was the first and it did not go well and is likely the reason for the pause. Had there not been such backlash from even with their own party and base, today might look quite different.
Translation: We have invented enough bullshit evidence to reasonably justify this.