Libs will reach the "violence is justified" conclusion when they are next in line to be shot.
chapotraphouse
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
This is not necessarily true, there's also the stiff-upper-lip moral victory folks and the "no way, I'd off myself and my family when it gets to that point" (instead of like actually opposing it)
Ugh I see my old self in this comment and I hate it.
They're liberals so the only time violence is justified to them is when it's against those to their left
Yet another entry in the "libs finally coming around to what leftists realized years ago" column.
Except they want to kill people in the name of the shittiest cause imaginable
Yet another entry in the "libs finally coming around to what leftists realized years ago" column.
They won't do anything about it though, and chuds will use this article as proof they need to kill them lmao
this feels like it's in an unholy superposition between and
they're going to say this, nothing will happen, and when the next lib comes to office none of the major policies will be reversed. the libs will call it a victory.
There was literally some idiot talking about how the U.S. can only exist as an isolationist fascist state or liberal imperial state (literally the same thing I know), and that he was willing to fight for it to be the latter, and I was like, doesn't that mean it's literally not a state worth fighting for? Absolute buffoons.
[D]oesnβt that mean itβs literally not a state worth fighting for?
The treats must flow.
God damnit you had me in the first half lmao
Mao-posting