this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
852 points (99.8% liked)

politics

23099 readers
3308 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Catholic Health Initiatives-Iowa, a faith-based health care provider, is arguing in a medical malpractice case that the loss of an unborn child does not equate to the death of a “person” for the purpose of calculating damage awards.

In Iowa, court-ordered awards for noneconomic losses stemming from medical malpractice are capped at $250,000, except in cases that entail the “loss or impairment of mind or body.”

Attorneys for the CHI and MercyOne hospital are arguing the cap on damages still applies in cases where the “loss” is that of a fetus or unborn child.

CHI’s status as a nonprofit, tax-exempt entity is based on its stated mission of providing health services “in the spirit of the gospel.” The ethics guidelines it approved in 2018 state that the corporation is committed to “respect the sacredness of every human life from the moment of conception until death.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 316 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Money is far more important than principles. -Modern Christianity

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Historically Christianity hasn’t been much different unless you go way back.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 21 points 1 week ago

Not really. They banned priest marriage so they could stop paying pensions to widows and would inherit all their property, and throughout the Catholic existence they were selling pardons for sins.

Even the establishment of Christianity was a cash grab. They gentrified Jesus because Jews weren’t interested in this particular messiah and it was the gentiles who had the cash at the time.

[–] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I dunno, there was some pretty cool stuff going on in central/south america in the 60s. Ernest cardenal and solentiname come to mind.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Yeah and Jesus was a pretty groovy dude but his religion hoards wealth.

I remember talking to a historian in Portugal who said she loved the Vatican for its history, but hated it for its opulence.

[–] orange_squeezer@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Less than twenty years after the Catholic church formed "rat lines" to smuggle Nazis to South America to protect them from prosecution for their crimes against humanity.

It's okay though, they both apologized to and forgave themselves in their own heads so it'd be rude to bring it up.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Blessed are the rich and powerful, for they fill God's collection plate

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 29 points 1 week ago

"But He loves you. He loves you, and He needs money! He always needs money! He’s all-powerful, all-perfect, all-knowing, and all-wise, somehow just can’t handle money! Religion takes in billions of dollars, they pay no taxes, and they always need a little more. Now, you talk about a good bullshit story. Holy Shit!"

-George Carlin

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

The Christian Schrodinger Fetus ..... it is neither dead nor alive ... worthless nor valuable .... you don't know what it is until you see it and once you do, it is probably already dead

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 168 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Hey hey now. Dont be bashful. You and your ilk has screamed that it does. In your eyes, you killed a person. You can't switch when its uncomfortable for you.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 61 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, they can and will.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just dig up their past statements. They've definitely said shit on abortion before, they're religious they can't help it.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 1 week ago

religion has never been about truth or consistency, it's a matter of power

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I would love to have the judge question them directly on the sanctity of human life and how it does not apply in this case but applies to abortion.

Hell, if we can get a hold of the plaintiff and ask them to lose the case so that we can build case law off of the ruling, we might be able to get the Catholic church on record as saying abortion should be legalized.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, they'll just say it's only valid if they do it, like an annulment vs. a divorce

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Them losing doesn't guarantee anything if it isn't well argued. They need to try to win and put up the best defence. If they fail then there will be a solid case to take it further if they throw it, higher courts will look at it and the arguments and see that it doesn't apply.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 119 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Abortion is MURDER! UNLESS it Costs us MONEY in Which case Abortion is NOT MURDER!

-People who Follow the ~~10~~ ~~9~~ ~~8~~ ~~7~~ some Commandments!

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago
[–] pappabosley@lemm.ee 99 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rules for thee and not for me

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I've encountered many situations of priests having girlfriends, boyfriends and even whole ass families on the side and the parishioners were...okay with it? Like, being celibate is one of the basic prerequisites for your job and you are violating it so casually? No wonder the Catholic church is hemorraging members, this type of in-your-face hipocrisy has become commonplace.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is an even more finicky situation. Roman Catholic priests cannot marry, but Eastern Catholic priests can, and there are exemptions that can be made for Roman Catholic converts. On top of that, you may have seen a “high church” protestant group (looks like a Catholic Church) like Anglicans who generally can marry or date.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

The reason behind priests not being allowed to marry originally had nothing to do with their faith though. It's because Catholic priests were bequeathing church assets to their children when they died. The church just put a thin veneer of dogma on top of the reasoning when they used the dictate of no marriage to stop the theft.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago

"Faith-based health care provider" is one of the saddest euphemisms I've heard in a while.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago

I mean they cover up child rape . Totally on brand for them and most religious organizations

[–] honeybadger1417@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago

I don't know why I'm still surprised by the hypocrisy at this point.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Abortion? It's a person, you murderers!

We fucked up? Well it's a fetus, not a person!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Well, the problem is that "Faith Based Institutions" are exposed to any amount of liability for anything at all. Obviously, these people were infallible and it was the sinful patients who were at fault.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 week ago

Those guys will say almost anything for their weekly free money.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Catholic Health Initiatives-Iowa, a faith-based health care provider

A what?

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

It is a left over system where hospitals were basically run by nuns and churches. Originally done in good faith as there wasn't any other option, so nuns would double as nurses, staff, etc. That is basically how Mayo clinic started. It is outdated now but many of those hospitals combined to form CHI, Dignity... Some are huge systems.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It's who provides medicine in America. Why do you think our media depicts healers as clerics and priests.

Fr. John gives a hell of a sermon alongside his trademark appendectomy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now, now, the Laws of Hammurabi clearly state what to do here...

22 “If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.

So you will note that punishment is only given out as the woman is harmed, as this is a life. Miscarriage shmishcarriage, it's not a life yet so no harm done, no punishment given.

It's an open and shut case, Your Honour. The husband can demand all he wants but no life was harmed here, no eyes, no teeth, the $250,000 cap applies as "the court allows".

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (11 children)

The Bible does say in several places that life begins at the first breath.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago

The bible also gives you a recipe that will induce abortion, yet here we fucking are.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

The Bible says a lot of things, you think they’ll listen?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is zero point in ever listening to what a conservative is saying. It changes based on whatever they think is beneficial to them in that exact moment. They're like the demons from Frieren.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Ahhhhhh this rules 😂

Not so convicted in your beliefs that you won't turn over some of the peoples donations?

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

Well, that almost feels like hypocrisy, doesn’t it?

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

the link wasn't working for me, so I archived it:

https://archive.is/4nCr7

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

A hypocrisy is you

Maybe get out of the healthcare industry if you're not willing to provide care for patients' health.

load more comments
view more: next ›