this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
473 points (97.2% liked)

politics

22929 readers
3728 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Return the dignity of work to young men who need to be at work instead of playing video games all day."

House Speaker Mike Johnson defended Republican efforts to attach work requirements to Medicaid, suggesting that young American men are wasting their lives "playing video games all day" instead of working.

Johnson's remarks came as House Republicans pushed forward a budget framework that would help finance President Donald Trump's tax cuts, with plans to slash federal spending by trillions. GOP leaders are eyeing $880 billion in reductions to Medicaid, a move critics warn could gut health coverage for millions of low-income Americans.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago

I’ll give up my fantasy worlds when you give up yours. Yours has been far more detrimental to the world.

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He had me at "Return the dignity of work".

I don't think that he has any intention to do that, but that would certainly go a long way towards getting people to work like he wants.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JealousJail@feddit.org 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I‘m curious if he told Elmo the same. The ~~guy~~ nazi who streams gaming content from his private jet 30% of his day, posts shit on shitter 60% of the day and fucks up democracy 20% of the day.

This is what these productivity gurus are referring to when they‘re talking about giving 110% every day

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Mike Johnson, you know who's "draining resources?"

Your mother.

Many men look at the pain/reward ratio and it's not actually worth it. People are rational: toiling away to at best afford a tiny apartment that takes up half your salary while the other half is spent on food is not alluring. Ironically, this guy is in a position to alter society so the rewards are not so small and instead he chooses moral condemnation as the tool to motivate, as though his castigation will change the equation. He may be an idiot or may be very intelligent and just exploiting the system by saying what people want to hear to distract from the real problem.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Big call out by a man with so much free time his son has to monitor his porn usage

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

That always disturbed me. It’s disturbing that he mentioned it publicly and doesn’t find anything wrong with it.

Lmao fuck all the way off, Christian Dominionist Captain Narnia

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I've been working since I was 13. But I think my avocado toast budget just can't be cut any further.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well since its always projection with these losers, I wonder what he's been playing lately that he feels so guilty about.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Anime-based porn games... Doesn't filter out by his son.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago

They targeted gamers.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Mike Johnson needs to drain my butt while I drain resources. In other words, eat shit, you fucknutter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 24 points 3 days ago

Pay people more work and have them do dignified jobs (ie: not making them pee in a bottle) and you'd have more people working.

Treat people like shit and crash the global economy, not so much.

But it's not like conservatives care about making sense of being consistent. Hang mike johnson.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

He hates them because they're fun and he's republican. Sad and pathetic to end up so cross.

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago

This must be a sign from God that I need to pursue the American dream of monetized game streaming.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago

‘They’re draining resources’

... from their rich overlords.

That's what he means.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

I just finished working four 12 hour shifts dealing with morons and shitty people, Mike. I'll play some god damn video games if I want to.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

Mike Johnson, you are cordially invited to fuck all the way off with that delusional bullshit.

When the hell will 'wholly detached rich guy says other people should work harder to make him even richerer' stop being so fucking common? I see like one of these a month minimum these days. Man, fuck every one of these assclowns.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Mike Johnson has a very cab forward face. (Look it up, it was a thing.)

[–] eierkuchen@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Hes totally a drain on Oxygen ressources. He should stop using it.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Well-paying jobs are everywhere! In fact, I had three job offers hit me in the face just now while I was walking my dog.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What the fuck does that have to with access to medical care you absolute fucking waste of flesh‽

No one is living off of Medicare or Medicaid. No one is able to not work and instead play video games all day because of these programs. All a work requirement does is make it harder for these programs to help the people who need them. Which of course makes it more likely that they will be stu k with deteriorating health issues which will make it harder for them to work.

This is just an attempt to cut benefits for the poor to make room for tax cuts for the rich. It's all about obfuscating the cuts so they can try to dodge accountability.

Fuck you Mike Johnson. You are net drain on humanity. You are actively working to increase suffering and death. Stop pretending to love Jesus because the last time he met someone like you he whipped them and drove them out of the temple.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Possibly mildly unpopular opinion. I'd probably be happy giving up gaming to work more, say 60 hours a week total, if that meant I could fully support my family on my own income and let my wife do something other than work (if she chooses)

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 15 points 3 days ago

Just repeating what the others said, but the 40 hour work week is brutal enough on balancing home and family. When I would pull overtime shifts and work 60-80 hour weeks, only a fool would have been able to look at what was going on and call it reasonable. I'd come home from work, if it was day 6 I would throw the clothes in the wash, crawl into bed, wake up and shower, put on the work uniform, and go back to work.

Food was whatever restaurant or fast food joint a coworker was heading to, and maybe some peanut butter or crackers at home.

I was single then, and no kids or true responsibilities outside of work. It would have been insanity to try and add significant chores and child-rearing to that timetable, and any romance with the partner would be impossible. It doesn't have anything to do with gaming, much less your wife and family.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

I'm not sure what your profession is but I worked a relatively easy job and 60 hours killed me, plus killed any semblance of family life I had. You're not home, and when you are you're too exhausted to do anything. With a physically gruelling job I'd imagine it would be even worse l.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

I doubt you'd be happy with that long term. I had a friend who did that and it burned him out hard, working long hours for a family he hardly had time with. But maybe you're exceptional.

Regardless, it's not easy to find a job like that in this economy.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

No thanks I would like a work life balance.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›