this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
856 points (93.3% liked)

Political Memes

7773 readers
2013 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 163 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Everyone who thinks this seems to forget that they have to live through the collapse of civilization. It's not gonna be pleasant.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (20 children)

Accelerationists aren't exactly deep thinkers who understand entropy.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It reminds me too much of these moments in RTS games, or Sim City, that time you got hit hard and you have to rebuild, but don't have resources to build, but to get more resources you need to build infrastructure. It can take so long to get out of that rut, and that's of you don't get hit by another calamity.

Sometimes I think any policy maker should play a game of old school Sim City 2000 and we can all see how they do before we vote for them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No spoilers, I know, but have you watched the news recently?

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 24 points 1 week ago (8 children)

No, I know. Like I said, it's not going to be pleasant.

It's already not pleasant, but it's going to not be, too.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] segabased@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Everyone is so used to consuming news not necessarily as entertainment but as background hum or as ammunition to confirm their ideology or dispel another. This isn't wrong per se, but I think the consequence of constant barrage of war, disaster, tragedy, corporate abuse, political abuse at home and abroad desensitizes people to the possibility that these things can happen to them tomorrow right outside their front door.

They're so used to the idea that theoretically the government has always been able to do whatever it wants to you they don't realize how viscerally real it is that now they can do it without making excuses or cover ups, or under any pretense, and not only will no one do anything but millions will support the regime while you're black bagged without due process. Authoritarian violence in America was always bad, but at least there had to be an excuse, a judicial system set up to defend cops who lie and say they felt threatened. Soon they will be brazen enough to snatch you up without pretense of a crime, without anyone knowing and without needing to explain themselves

They don't realize how viscerally bad it will be for them when war breaks out no matter which side of that war they are on. Accelerationists are fucking clowns and they are not prepared for the world they've been jerking off to.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 68 points 1 week ago (23 children)

ah, exactly what i missed from reddit: ableist wojak PCM nonsense. lovely.

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 19 points 1 week ago

Very first reaction I had and thankful I wasn't the only one…

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 week ago (8 children)

What's up with this centrist nonsense? It's a good thing to want to change the existing power structures actually.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 88 points 1 week ago (22 children)

I only see mockery of accelerationists, which I broadly support. Its 10 times easier to reform an existing government that to destroy and build a good one from scratch.

[–] lyricanna@ttrpg.network 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

To be fair, the only reason I sound like an accelerationist, is because the building is clearly on fire right now and I'm presuming its structural at this point. So yeah, while I wish it didn't get to this point, it feels likely that we will have to rebuild things from the ground up.

[–] match@pawb.social 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

life hack: begin building new social structures before the current ones collapse

[–] silverlose@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Accelerationists HATE him for this one weird trick, click to read more

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

You sound like an accelerationist because you think things are unsalvageable? Go figure.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Such things are possible without the collapse of society.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 week ago (35 children)

Anarchists (lib left) aren't typically waiting for society to collapse. We typically focus on building the world we want to see now in order to make the collapsing society unnecessary to provide out material needs. You know, the whole mutual aide and community organizing bit.

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I suspect that it's a mental error to imagine that there's one ideal ideology to start with.

For example, I think the founding fathers of America envisioned that the federal government would be smaller than the state governments. It's not completely insane to imagine supporting true libertarians for a federal government and a progressive left wing party for a state government.

But people aren't that mentally flexible. If they vote right wing for federal government, they will never vote left wing for state government. And so, despite the fact that capitalism can solve certain problems quite efficiently, the fact that it's utterly unsuited to solve our most common problems like making sure people have basic essentials means that libertarianism is a bit of a dead end, unless people can actually learn to think flexibly.

This is one of the basic reasons why Political Compass Memes is such a bad idea. It encourages people to lock in their political identity, rather than remain flexible, and centrism isn't the answer, either. We should be trying to use the right tool for the right job.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] turnip@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If a house is 4 million dollars and you work as an uber driver or cashier you may have a different opinion that everything is good. All this current world order has done is monetize everything with debt, a big wall of debt that bids up the price of inelastic goods, as the rich borrow as much as possible to write off their cheap debt using their inflated collateral while never liquidating a penny of their assets.

Then when their mansion burns down due to building in a risky area or the bank that lends all this debt overextends then the government bails them out, as peoples paychecks are inflated away and they are denied pay raises due to the bad economy.

But I'm one of these smooth brains.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you want society to collapse then yes you are a smooth brain.

Things can always be worse. And they wont only get worse for you, so if you are ok dragging everyone down into hell with you, you aren't just dumb, you are evil.

[–] turnip@lemm.ee 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Youre increasing asset holders, mainly the rich, drastically while taking it from everyone else. Things are getting signifigantly worse as housing prices rise, birth rates fall, and populism inevitably increases.

We treat future promises of money, mainly debt, the same as we value existing money. Every loan is new money supply, which favors the rich who hold collateral, and who benefit the most from the cantillon effect. They also generally benefit the most from bailouts, which is just another symptom of loose money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It’s not all or nothing, another way to think of it is:

How bad do things have to get for there to be an actual shift to making things better?

I would love to make things better one step at a time, I think our system is a great starting point.

But I ask myself the above question everytime things seem to be headed downward.

Events like Luigi is what I mean by things getting bad enough for something to push back.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Accelerationism is cringe. Do you want to change society? Start doing Prefiguration.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Time to get Hari Seldon and prepare a foundation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›