this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
85 points (94.7% liked)

politics

22655 readers
3724 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

For Europeans, a quick primer on American uses of the term:

"Liberal" = socially liberal: gay marriage ok, trans people ok, immigrants ok

"Neoliberal" = economically liberal: laissez-faire, lower taxes on businesses, fewer worker protections

"Liberal" is left-wing. "Neoliberal" is right-wing. Sounds similar, very different. There are a lot of bad actors on lemmy who intentionally try to conflate the two. Don't let them confuse you.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 16 points 16 hours ago

All of these seemingly insane actions only make sense when you’re preparing for a world war. Everyone is trying to find a rational explanation while ignoring this major shift is going on.

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 55 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Neoliberalism is just a fascist gateway drug. Fascism Lite, all the corporate rule half the stigma. This is just the eventuality of the last forty years.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -3 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Downvote me, but please describe what "neoliberalism" means to you?

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

In short. Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. And most politicians since then in the west. It has been a bipartisan policy of economics in the US since Reagan (and arguably started by Carter).

In long form. This video.

https://youtu.be/oWOH9iJhZXo

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Words have definitions. There are these things called dictionaries that people can find these definitions in. In super short context its a far right ideology brought to mainstream politics by notable figures like Pinochet, Ronald Reagan and Margret Thatcher. Later embraced by Bill Clinton during the neoliberal takeover of the democratic party at the time when they turned their backs on the unions and people in favor of corporations and bankers. Neoliberalism differs from classical and social liberalism in that it is about freeing capital and not people. The article below explains all this in greater detail than I'm going to get into.

It is important to remember that just because a word shares the root liber latin for free these ideoligies differ greatly in their application and meaning and history.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not Maiq, but neoliberalism is mainly a conservative economics rebrand attempt similar to "classical liberalism", which was first used before the second world war, which also lead to at least Austria's economy crashing and then being taken over by Hitler.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -5 points 16 hours ago

And how does that apply here by example except for this assertion I'm a comment?

[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

JDPON Don is my favorite term.

(JDPON) Joint-dictatorship of the proletariat of oppressed nations

Is in reference Maoist third worldist literature. And is a aimed at breaking the political and economic foundations of the economic parasitism between the First and Third Worlds

Basically Donald Trump is so incompetent that he's bringing about a united proletariat revolution of the third world against the first.

Which, given his isolationist policies that push third world countries to work with and develop with China that's essentially what is happening.

As long as China continues to allow for third world development (rather than just resource extraction) like the US has. It is a big step forward for third world independence along with the dismantling of USAID.

Edit: To be clear. I don't actually believe Trump is doing this on purpose. It's a joke around his incompetence around ruling an empire and essentially destroying it from within. In reality I think he's doing this to bring about instability and war. The war starting first with the war on the working class of the world with Tarrifs. Specifically to bring about nationalist movements in each nation.