this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
1048 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22612 readers
4755 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Please don't give him ideas.

[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We’re definitely in show me your papers days

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] dellish@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

no lol that's insanely well done.

[–] uuldika@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

the 8bit FOX interview with Tucker Carlson felt incredibly on theme. you could seriously remake Papers, Please with these aesthetics.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

What is it about black on red...

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Except now they just scan your retina from afar

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 97 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Never thought I would see a flood of Americans refugees coming to Canada to escape a tyrannical government...

I guess that's what you get when you elect a criminal with dementia as president.

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago

I mean.... There was that whole Vietnam draft thing in the 60s/70s...

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Really? People have been talking about it since the Bush administration. Until now things hadn't gotten bad enough for people to actually do it in large numbers, but people saying that if the Republicans win they'd move to Canada has been repeated so often over the decades that it became a bit of a joke.

[–] lorski@sopuli.xyz 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Trump 2.0 is WAY worse than any Bush.

[–] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Remember when we thought Bush was bad? God I'd love to have him instead

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I can’t believe GWB = good old days now. My how we’ve fallen

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Without the crucial steps the W Bush admin took, there would be no Trump. It's not that Trump isn't worse but they are part of the same fascist movement, just further developed.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ilost7489@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know this isn’t related to the article but I would love it as a fuck you to Trump if Canada started allowing political refugees from the states

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

My fear would be our MAGAts would lie tou you, claim they were never MAGA, get in, and start the same shit there.

[–] overcooked_sap@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago

Just so you know, Canada’s version of the NSA actually hosted NSA staff or provided signal intelligence to US agencies so they could circumvent the “no spying on us citizens” part of many laws.

We do know how to profile people and have done it internally quite well for some time. Our blind spot is more international due to being the US lapdog. But that will change soon enough.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›