this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
91 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22612 readers
4755 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This kind of rebuild-the-complex-system-from-scratch thing is always really tempting, and generally a complete disaster.

Archived copies of the article:

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Collapse is already starting. Many banks release SS checks several days before the official date, but they haven't arrived this month yet. Normally it shows up around the 26-28th, but it still hasn't. I asked my bank about it, and they said that soon they will have to release the checks on the official date, the 3rd. I use my SS to pay my rent, so this means that instead of my rent consistently being a few days early, it will consistently be a few days late.

They want to kill SS, and this is the first step. Once we are used to losing our early release, it will start coming a day or two late. Then a week late. People will be upset, but it will eventually show up, so they'll calm down. Then one month it will be skipped altogether, then go back to normal. Then it will happen again, until people will not be able to count on SS being reliable.

That's when they will say that the system is broken, and it should be cancelled immediately, and a new system will be developed, just like the MAGA Health Care plan. A decade of saying the new plan will be the best plan in the world, and its coming any minute, only to be told after a decade that they only have "concepts of a plan."

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago (1 children)

LOLOL. 100% success, I don't see any issues with this whatsoever. Musk's track record on such promises certainly is airtight, and his little Hitler Youth engineering team surely has this under control.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This sounds like a junior dev thing. "Why can't we just rebuild it from scratch?" comes from a place of complete ignorance and lack of experience.

They're going to realize that the last 1% of work is going to take 99% of the time, and Musk (Mr. Dunning-Kruger himself) is going to quickly find himself knee deep in shit.

I guarantee that if they release it at whatever deadline they set, it's going to be a flaming dumpster fire. MMW.

Exactly. They think they'll run it through AI and get a fully assembled and working translation on the other side. Fucking idiotic.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (7 children)

So we will have to rebuild it again in four years to remove all the backdoors put in place

Exactly, its like having a Ransomware hacker working directly for the government.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago

More like the department will be crippled for years. The replaced code will not work, corrupting data. I fully expect them to make it hard to replace the new stuff with the older systems which has tens of millions of moving parts.

The damage will be so great that people applying for social security a generation from now will still feel aftereffects

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

You are optimistically assuming that they have something working in four years.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

I'm willing to bet my house they won't even be able to build funcional backdoors in the first place.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

As if we don’t need to rebuild absolutely everything already. All our base are belong to the blyats.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

tHEy wOn’T TouCh sOCiAL SecUriTy, thAT’s CraZy

-so, so many people that I’ve talked to.

Stop being surprised. They made a playbook. The posted it online 5 years ago. They said they’d follow it. They are following it. They will continue to follow it. This is not a surprise. You’re not allowed to be surprised.

STOP BEING FUCKING SURPRISED BY THIS.

[–] taco@piefed.social 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I can't imagine there's a huge overlap between people seeing this comment and people who said they wouldn't touch social security. The people this needs to be yelled at aren't getting their news online (at least not the ones I've interacted with).

I know that. This is me just expressing my frustration.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is insane and stupid and tells me there's no one involved in the process that has ever managed a software project before, which makes it doubly insane and stupid.

Of course a fresh out of college hotshot thinks they can complete a major coding project in 3 months. That's why no one takes their estimates seriously, not announces them to the world.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Don't worry. The most important part of software development these days is not to make sure the code works and is free of errors, it is to attend the daily standups and the many other "agile" time waster meetings. If the software sends your money to another person instead like the software my company created, they can just fix it in some followup sprint 6 months later. Maybe.

[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That is the point. He wants it to collapse. Musk has repeatedly talked about how he thinks social security shouldn't exist at all.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 5 points 5 days ago

Yup. The chaos is the point.

[–] minnow@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

It makes me genuinely wonder if they're going to actually try to reprogram it or just do nothing and say they did.

Another real possibility is Musk ours a small team of three or four fresh college graduates on the job knowing that they'll fail, essentially setting them up to be the fall guys if he can't avoid repercussions.

Either way the goal is not to benefit the people who rely on social security.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We all know how good Musk is with timelines... how full self driving going?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

We were supposed to go to Mars 10 years ago!

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago

... Ok then.

My only income is SSDI.

... Guess its time to set up a go fund me or my cash app tag in my profile or something...

[–] KingOogaBooga@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

This is not how you do software and infrastructure upgrades. If Elmo and brain cell one that was not riddled with drugs he would know this.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 5 days ago

Do you think Musk will use the right glue this time?

[–] Amanduh@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

Just throw the entire code base to grok and ask for it to be written in react, nothing can go wrong.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The thing that kills government IT projects is Scale. Any beginner can whip up some forms in Access, but to get a thing like that to work on a national scale, most components need to be hand-crafted and -optimized.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A lot of stuff seems to start breaking around 5 or 6 digit numbers of users.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Been there, seen that. Ages ago, I got a customers database project on my desk. Trying to add an entry threw the server into a frenzy, from which he did not return. It was the 65537th entry...

Many network applications break at 64512 (or a bunch less) concurrent users. Guess why.

I've seen my fair shit pieces of programming in over 40 years at the keyboard...

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Plus it will have all the usual edge case errors of software thrown together by some code monkey trying to make his "agile" arbitrary sprint deadline. Most places these days use a software development process that minimizes quality and maximizes bugs.

Move fast to give billionaires gigantic tax cuts and break Social Security!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Oh yea. And to speed things up, they will use AI for doing parts of the software. It will have the most bugs, and nobody really has an idea what the software does. Or how.

It's taken my team months to stand up a vendor product, that's been installed by at least a dozen customers in similar sized businesses, with half a dozen vendor reps on-call 24/7.

I'm going to guess these geniuses will use MS Access.

[–] Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

After many months of DOGE completely restructuring SS: “Oops, sorry! We accidentally wired all your money to Israel.”

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Because that worked so well with Twitter. Or going to Mars. Or Tesla.

Only this time it's so much worse. Goddammit this is all so dark.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago

Let’s get it on, bitches. Break that thang and let’s see what happens.