this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
113 points (84.2% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

957 readers
112 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Context:

The article in question was well sourced, factually accurate, and written by a well-renowned author and journalist whose work appears elsewhere too, regardless of which outlet published it.

Nonetheless, Jordan Lund is once again blindly trusting a pro-zionist conservative outlet masquerading as a bias and fact checker that nothing from anywhere that criticizes the fascist apartheid regime can be reliable 🤦

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] satans_methpipe@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Jordanlund is a big ol bitch.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Weekly reminder that Jordan Lund is the same piece of shit Zionist redditor that hates BLM because protests are too loud and inconvenience him. The dude is a republican shitstain.

[–] nomugisan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

PTB. Lund needs to leave Portland and see the real world lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

wikipedia lists mint as an unreliable source, of course, I don't doubt the article, its clear that he's using it as an excuse to take down the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Legend

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (4 children)

But anyone who isn't a moron knows that MBFC is an incredibly biased source...... Right?

Literally they make it so obvious

It's my one grouse with the Tesseract ui, that they grab MBFC ratings for every post linking an external site and highlight it. It's not the awesome feature you seem to think it is, Patrick

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They think that because it claims to be accurate, therefore it is. No fact checking of themselves, no matter how it is completely wrong and treats liberal media as far left, and fox news are center right, it's the godsend for the mods to remove anything they dislike.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's in the Wikipedia sourcing guidelines: Absolutely under no circumstances should you reference Wikipedia as a reliable source, it needs to be something external, ideally something with some expertise, because if you never check yourself from outside, you can believe literally anything because you believe it just because at some point it made its way into your little collection, and self-referential loops are bad.

Meanwhile MBFC's rating for MBFC: 10/10 bro

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Wikipedia is a god send for how communal fact reporting. I love how they list accepted sources, sources considered fine in some instances, and out right refuse to have some ever listed, except for documentation of themselves as a reference, some don't even get that treatment, just forever barred.

I do love going to the wikipedia pages about times wikipedia has caught itself in a cycle of where:

Someone edited Wikipedia without a citation -> A place used this as a citation of sorts -> the place is now cited on wikipedia, as a source of why its true

Like fun fact, the name of the Pringles mascot was invented by an editor of wikipedia as a joke before wikipedia caught it. Julius Pringle was the name of the dude according to a college student who added it as a prank back in the day, and randomly Pringles said that was his name saying that's what it must have been according to their own research. That random edit made a national food company effectively retcon themselves.

Wikipedia is in general, pretty good for what it is. Not perfect, but overall accurate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Christ on a bike.

I have a hard time taking seriously anything or anyone who says “Far-Left Biased” (esp. with that capitalization) unironically.

Lazy PTB on the grounds of (maybe mindlessly) parroting Fox News rhetoric instead of researching themselves.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

The world skews left anyway. Also, politics in 'merica is so screwed that everything skews to the right.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Oh i just realized that stupid bias check bot has been gone for a while. Everyone hated it so i guess it was killed or blocked at some point? Anyone know the story?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Personally I haven't seen it for ages because I blocked it, but if I was to guess, the mods finally relented to the overwhelming majority? 🤷

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 day ago (20 children)

They held a vote after insisting for ages that it was a ‘small minority’ of users that had a problem with it. It wasn’t 90/10, but it wasn’t 50/50 either.

Oh, and they only held the vote after jordanlund claimed he would get demodded by the admins if he removed the bot. And when someone pinged an admin they said they had no idea how he got that impression, lol.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 26 points 1 day ago (10 children)

TIL Mint Press News.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MintPress_News

MintPress News supported former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, and the governments of Russia and Iran.[3][4]

The editor had investors, who Muhawesh claimed were "retired businesspeople", but she would not name them

Soon afterward, Brian Lambert of MinnPost wrote an article following up on Burke's challenge to find out where MintPress's money came from. He reported that emails to them went unanswered, their phone was disconnected, and the original office address in Plymouth, Minnesota, "haven't been valid in well over a year". While MintPress listed 20 of its writers, Lambert wrote it did not indicate where the money was "coming from to pay any of these people".[16]

MintPress News has reposted content from Russian state media outlets RT and Sputnik,[25][26] and is listed as a "partner" of PeaceData, a Russian fake news site run by the Internet Research Agency.[27][28][29] A report from New Knowledge includes MintPress News as part of the "Russian web of disinformation,"[30][31] and the site has published fake authors attributed to the GRU, the Russian military intelligence agency.[32] MintPress News defended Russia's invasion of Crimea, claiming Ukraine's post-revolution government was "illegitimate".[33]

Sounds like YDI. MBFC is horrible of course, but it sounds like in this case they got it right (somehow focusing in one of the only things Mint Press gets right, being "anti-Israel", presumably as a performative cover so they'll fit in better among other general left wing news. Which of course triggered MBFC, which is part of the whole reason why it's clever for them to include a whole bunch of "Israel's the bad guys" in among the "Russia's the good guys.")

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›