this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
106 points (84.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

954 readers
288 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Context:

The article in question was well sourced, factually accurate, and written by a well-renowned author and journalist whose work appears elsewhere too, regardless of which outlet published it.

Nonetheless, Jordan Lund is once again blindly trusting a pro-zionist conservative outlet masquerading as a bias and fact checker that nothing from anywhere that criticizes the fascist apartheid regime can be reliable 🤦

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

wikipedia lists mint as an unreliable source, of course, I don't doubt the article, its clear that he's using it as an excuse to take down the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Legend

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Weekly reminder that Jordan Lund is the same piece of shit Zionist redditor that hates BLM because protests are too loud and inconvenience him. The dude is a republican shitstain.

[–] nomugisan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

PTB. Lund needs to leave Portland and see the real world lmao

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Does Chicago count? Las Vegas? Los Angeles? Seattle? San Diego? San Francisco? Cupertino? Laguna Beach? Memphis was interesting. Not counting "airport only" trips like Denver, Atlanta, or Salt Lake City.

[–] remon@ani.social 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

The community rules cleary states that opinion pieces and unreliable sources are subject to removal. You posted the epitome of an unreliable source. This is just enforcing the rules.

YDI.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn’t matter what the source is, anybody with eyes can figure out that the article is truthful from the fact Glasgow fans have a habit of bringing giant Palestinian flags to games.

Plus, Jordan is a piece of shit conservative who hates minorities.

[–] remon@ani.social 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn’t matter what the source is

I disagree.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago

Well, you’re allowed to. But you’re not allowed to ignore the part about the source being right and still act like you’re not full of shit.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's not an opinion piece and the author himself is a reliable source.

By the logic of you and jordanlund, everything Malala Yousafzai ever said in should have been dismissed as unreliable for happening in a Taliban-controlled area.

Or, for a less hyperbolic example of the opposite, automatically trusting every source with a good reputation to the point where you trust the New York Times on stories regarding Palestine or cops.

[–] remon@ani.social 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

It’s not an opinion piece and the author himself is a reliable source.

But the website that is publishing it, isn't. There is also the occasional accurate article on breitbart or foxnews ... doesn't mean those sources should be allowed.

If your author is reliable, surley a more reliable source will publish his article. Link to that instead.

By the logic of you and jordanlund, everything Malala Yousafzai ever said in should have been dismissed as unreliable for happening in a Taliban-controlled area.

There is no logic to that statement.

Or, for a less hyperbolic example of the opposite, automatically trusting every source with a good reputation to the point where you trust the New York Times on stories regarding Palestine or cops.

If a source has repeatedly demonstratate to be unreliable, that is a good reason to completely avoid that source. But that does in no way imply that a source that has demonstrated to be reliable should always be trusted. Not even sure how you got there.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›