this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
891 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

7055 readers
3915 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pubquiz@lemmy.world 2 points 27 minutes ago

I wish every magat in the world would realize what a significant marker this is!!!

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

I hope this doesn’t sound too insane given that currently this is “good news” or at least good metrics for us: But I often worry about using the stock market as a metric for anyone notable.

For instance, I picture a future where a politican pushes hard for increases to minimum wage…and the stock market tanks because “free labor is ruined”. There are some bubbles where it really should tank and I just worry that we’d be excusing it then, and now now.

Granted: It is my belief that there’s no bubbles now and that Biden handed us a working system - one that Trump is throwing wrenches into. I just think after the GME fiasco, we shouldn’t necessarily trust the stock market as a perfect system run by level-headed people.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago

Would be interested in seeing the full 4 year terms as well

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 49 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

If conservatives could comprehend numbers, they'd be real upset.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

if they could read at all they'd blame biden for an education plan, giving no credit to michelle oabama

[–] AynRandLibertarian@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

How mean, if they could read, they'd be pissed...

I think they would demand data from the first term.

[–] nelly_man@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

For anybody that's interested, it looks like the source of this visualization is sort of this Reddit post on r/dataisbeautiful.

At the very least, it's OC of the same numbers, but slightly different layout.

[–] momodocho@lemmings.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Thanks for the source

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 35 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

They should've added Trump 2016 too, dunno what would it look like but omitting stuff isn't great

[–] pubquiz@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

Good bot - way to sow doubt. Fucker.

[–] ralakus@lemmy.world 52 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So even with less dementia in 2016 Trump still couldn't beat a Democrat.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AynRandLibertarian@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

However the economic devastation is gonna last decades...

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I thought you had drawn it in with a sharpie. Lol

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I remember how a webstream of a lettuce was set up for Liz and she got kicked out faster than the lettuce on the webstream became rotten.

[–] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We need to start a trump lettuce stream!

[–] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Needs to be an orange, surely.

[–] AynRandLibertarian@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Lucifer the fallen angel...

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 25 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Obama 2013 doesn’t really make any sense. He was already president, so nothing changed. 2009 is probably much worse cause of Bush’s recession.

[–] pubquiz@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

Bad bot. Making so obviously provocative and distracting content is a give away. FUCKER.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

Obama 2009 looks about the same, maybe a bit stronger over 100 days. The market collapse happened in the final months of the Bush presidency, and it was just about at the bottom as Obama came into office.

To have a number as bad as Trump II, you have to go back to Bush's first term (in general the Bush graph is pretty bad, barely managing to make it back up to break-even for a few months before the 2008 collapse).

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 37 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It's important to note that Trump is responsible for what's happening. While Obama was given the financial crisis on his lap because of things out of his immediate control.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, other presidents have ups and downs and usually it's nearly a coincidence, good luck or bad on their part.

Trump absolutely is responsible for current economic conditions, with no ambiguity.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

100%. Neither is a good comparison, really. Trump 2017 vs Trump 2025 might be the best comparison. But that also implies he was responsible for 2017, which he wasn’t.

[–] AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 151 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

You know, personally, I don't think the rumours of Trump being an active foreign agent instead of "just" a narcissist grifter are useful, because they can be used to argue that things weren't already pretty borked before in the status quo.... (and I think they are wrong, personally)

But I do have to admit - if I was a foreign agent wanting to destroy the US and its influence in the world, I would basically do exactly what he is doing.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 126 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

My college degree focused on the collapse of the USSR and the US diplomatic response to it. I studied a lot of Soviet and Russian foreign policy. If Donald Trump is not a Russian asset he weirdly backs every single position you would expect a Russian asset to have.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 39 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

refusing to speak negatively of Putin in front of millions during the debate should've been a pretty clear wakeup call

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 29 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"He's a good man, strong man" and every red hat cheered. You dumb mother fuckers.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I love your pfp, rain frogs are PEAK fr
Also my mom's car is named figgy and we got her as a baby so we call her "little baby figs"

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Diesel, gasoline or electric?

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

He's in Putin's pocket for sure. You remember the closed door meeting with him and Putin his first time in office? Putin came out looking smug af and Trump looked like he'd just seen the ghost of his dead dad. Trump was best mates with Epstien and famously can't keep it his pants. My bet is that Putin has footage of him fucking a minor and is threatening to release it unless Trump toes the line.

[–] Zzyzx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 hours ago

Honestly, given the cult-like obsession of Trump followers, I can't even imagine a video like that making much of an impact on them. Sadly...

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I get the feeling such rumours are just the other face of the same kind of blind Nationalism as the MAGAts exhibit - the latter group is all about how America is a great country whilst the group spreading the "it's all due to Foreign interference" rumours are really just denying that the huge problems in America are mainly the fault of Americans.

Both are just spewing self-serving nationalism in the same direction: that Americans are good and it's foreigners who are bad.

It's generally a good idea to be skeptical of "explanations" which make the people giving them indirectly it look better, either by claiming than the group they're in is better than the rest or by exhonerating the group they're in as the cause of the problems that group is having.

[–] AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You put it better than I myself had formulated it in my head yet, why I am weary of those rumours. I find similar arguments here in Europe, where our fascist movements, which are without a doubt supported by Russia, are then sometimes reduced to being some sort of wholly foreign influence, instead of admitting that Russia is stoking flames in embers that had always been part of us and the problems we face.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The fields which are being harvested by both external adversaries and power hungry ethics-free insiders were plowed, fertilized and sowed by 4 decades of exposure to the style of disinformation favored by Neoliberalism whilst the consequences of its policies were getting more and more felt by the average person, IMHO.

When your belt keeps tightening, what you can buy with the income from working keeps being less and less and life feels more and more like swimming against the tide, all the while the authoritative figures of old (mainly the Press and mainstream party politicians) keep telling you that things are getting better ("the GDP is growing!"), eventually people lose trust in said authoritative figures and those with a similar style of discourse, which opens the door to non-mainstream political voices with a different style of discourse (including populists), and very wealthy people aren't going to be funding Leftwing parties whose ideas are not shaped by Neoliberalism, to fill the political gap opened by the general loss of trust on the mainstream, they're going to be funding Rightwing voices who blame the powerless for the ills of the nation rather than those very wealthy people who have been pillaging it for decades.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

I think he's inept, stupid, and doesn't have a plan or idea about what he's doing. Tariffs, eg, are the polar opposite of what he claims.

His puppeteers, however? They're just letting him run wild, destroying everything he touches, because they have the wherewithall to withstand the damage.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 37 points 14 hours ago (7 children)

And they are all making $$$. Insiders make out like crazy when the economy crashes, buy the low and hold. Open a for-profit prison. Get shady government contracts. Get the President to do a commercial for your cars in front of the White House. And on and on.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 49 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I realize the title is rhetorical, but just a reminder that AB not only reversed their support for the Bud Light campaign after just a few weeks of fascist bigot whining, they also fired the advertising manager responsible.

All over a single can of beer.

You probably can't buy beer regularly without giving them some of your money, but let's not forget what spineless cowards they are. (Just like Target.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] El_Azulito@lemmy.world 64 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve never seen a graph so metaphorically and literally apt.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 43 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Story of his life. At no point ever has DJT not been a loser. Such a failure of a human being, and the world will be much better once he exits it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 41 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (10 children)

I've often heard people describe the stock market as a graph of rich people's feelings. Looking at this, if that was true? This is the most relatable the 1% have been in a century.

Edit: Yeah I know, folks. I did say if.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›