this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
548 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

6974 readers
3717 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: updated meme due to being dumb and having not enough Ts in the word boycott.

Edit #2: in an attempt to ensure that no one thinks that this is a real post from Whitehouse.gov (because like, it's getting hard to fucking tell at this point) I'm updating the meme again but without the navigation or article buttons.

PS, I used WorldwideHeadline Regular for the font incase anyone want to use this as a template or what ever

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Boycotts have been illegal for a long time:

The state has been consistently serving a genocidal cult at the expense of our supposed "rights".

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago

The boycotts themselves aren't illegal. Its primarily that the government has made sustaining a boycott against Israel harder by pressuring non-profit organizations that could potentially aid or support a boycott by threatening their federal funding.

Its still absurd and disgusting. It might also still be unconstitutional and at the very least is clearly against the spirit of the 1st amendment.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 7 points 12 hours ago

Isnt this just evil DEI, only for companies?

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It’s illegal to not buy something? How does that work?

[–] wiLD0@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] petersr@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

First: Jesus christ.

Second: Of course, enforcement will be difficult, so it will probably mostly be an honor system. But lets see...

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nobody tell them I turned down an offer at an Israeli company because it was Israeli

[–] wiLD0@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can borrow a law enforcement technique called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction.

I'm not a bot that just spits out Wikipedia articles, I swear.

[–] vinyl@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Google, show me this guy's balls

[–] serkette@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 22 hours ago

Computer, load up Celery Man, please.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

(First time I've set safe search to strict in years 😄)

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if I wanted one I wouldn’t have the money to buy a Tesla. Is not being able to buy things also illegal now?

Yes, now go to ~~gulag~~ mental wellness camp

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except you aren’t required to buy a car. But I get the sentiment.

[–] potoo22@programming.dev 1 points 20 hours ago

Unless you live in a big city, you practically need a car in the US.

[–] Mechazawa@jlai.lu 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't even understand how that's supposed to work... Make boycott illegal is more or less forcing people to buy specific stuff ?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

It's literally been happening for years. It's illegal to boycott a genocidal cult.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/map-shows-states-where-boycotting-israel-is-illegal/ar-AA1nSvg0

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Boycott is more than the personal decision not to buy something but an organized action including public announcements, reach-outs, protests, ...

I don't know which one the first amendment is though. I guess it's freedom of speech?

[–] Dhs92@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Full text of the first:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 4 points 22 hours ago

They sure do want to abridge that freedom of speech and right to peaceably assemble.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Freedom of assembly (to organize a coordinated boycott)

[–] Mechazawa@jlai.lu 6 points 1 day ago

Oh, i get it, this makes more sense to me now. Yeah i think first amendment is freedom of speech and the right to assemble around some idea I guess.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

38 US states already have anti-BDS laws on the books. Unfortunately this has already been here to a large extent.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What the ever-loving fuck? How big is Israel’s dick that has all the countries lining to suck it?

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's effectively the 51st state with plausible deniability and nukes. Going against the country that spends more on its military than the next 10 combined is a big factor keeping them in line.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The knee bending to Isreal, and Zionists' obsession with racial purity is what makes so many conspiracy theorists buy into the "jewish cabal" conspiracy

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 9 points 1 day ago

Israel's current existence is unironically anti-semetic. They benefit from it.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

America’s Israel First policy has really taken shape in the past several years. Both Biden and Trump are wholly complicit in sacrificing our sovereignty for Israel, and it’s absolutely pathetic.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Consider that there are claims that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were Mossad spies.

[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, this. I had to sign a contract with the state (prior to all the Israel and Palestine stuff) and I was like the fuck is there a clause saying I can’t boycott anything to do with Israel?? Like in completely unrelated contracts you have to promise not to boycott or divest from Israel and I had no idea how or why that was even a thing because it didn’t cover any other country or entity. Israel has absolutely insanely good lobbying (or intelligence, or both).

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They lost the extra "T" in boycott.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because boycotts are still legal, only boycots are not

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Boycots sounds like something the catholic church supports.

[–] IronJess@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

It was named after a British tax collector in Ireland. Charles Boycott who was so hated nobody even the post office and grocery stores refused to do business with him. It got pc renamed as cancel culture when the name isn’t gendered. The best boycott of all time was the Montgomery bus boycotts.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Damn, lol. I should've used a spell checker. Will update.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is it with people posting screenshots of article headlines and no link?

I've been seeing it a lot, and no one else questions it

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is not a real headline. I made this with the Whitehouse burning while flying a Russian Nazi flag to illustrate the current situation and that this is not official.

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Woah is this OC? I must say, if it wasn't for the Russian flag I wouldn't know this was satire.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fresh outta GIMP