People don't even read the articles posted here before they upvote or downvote them. You're being very optimistic.
No Stupid Questions
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
I upvoted this comment without even reading it.
I only went back to read the comment because you told me you upvoted it. I wanted to make sure it was worthy.
!it was!<
People don’t even read the
Kind of strange of you to end your post on the word "the". Usually there's more words after "the".
People don't usually read
What do you mean? There are only 4 words
tldr but I am outraged by the existence of this comment.
Being misleading is the goal, not the side effect.
The orange idiot literally told people he only wanted their vote, that he doesn't care about them or their problems. It's on video.
They still heard something wildly different.
People have demonstrated beyond any doubt that at least 51% are irredeemably stupid.
And Harris published a detailed platform on her campaigns website but was still criticized for not standing for anything.
He literally said he wanted the unilateral ability to remove benefits of a constitutional amendment from United States citizens. Once you give that ability to one President you give it to ALL of them. Once you let a President do that to one amendment, you let them do it to ALL amendments.
People voted in mass for that option.
On a side note when this blows up in their faces, I will have ZERO sympathy. They want it, they got it.
We have that in the UK, the parties all publish manifestos before elections. I think it helps to get the message across and to be clear about what they are and aren't promising to do. They aren't, however, legally enforceable so parties aren't obliged to actually follow up on their promises.
If we have this data for each election, someone could also compile statistics on how well each party follows through with their promises. Ideally weighted by how much voters care about each promise.
"I promise cupcakes for everybody!"
"Thats terribly bold of you sir...what about the diabetic?"
"Don't worry Johnson. It's just an empty promise! I'll be the only one to get cupcakes! Mwa ha ha ha ha!!!!"
They do. Nobody reads them
Parties rarely follow their manifestos.
Ok, make it a post election thing.
It should honestly be a binding contract in some way. Like if I say I'm not doing Project 25, but I actually start implementing project 25, I should be recalled and an election takes place again with me disqualified
It's quite optimistic to think people would read even that, but imo it's not an issue of understanding. In my experience, people pick a side and stick with it. Most people cannot be convinced of anything.
Depends on who does the summarizing
trump's "he was just joking" should become "he wAs jUSt joKING"