this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
661 points (99.0% liked)

News

25286 readers
3927 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Simultaneous purging of the chief generals of all three branches.
They are ensuring the military has no cohesiveness to stage a future coup against the Executive Branch, and are replacing all control with their own loyalists.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

"Trump administration fires all non-white chiefs in unprecedented purge of military leadership"

Fixed the title

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is to ensure the military won't be able to stop them. Expect much more and worse soon

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No doubt on the advice directly from Putin.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 15 hours ago

*direct order

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Waiting for Trump to put the leaders of the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers into these positions.

[–] Corno@lemm.ee 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Imagine helping to protect your country for 40 years, only to have a felon who is offended over the existence of people with any skin colour besides white take all that away from you. I predict that a white man will be offered to take Brown's place and will be far less qualified.

That's what all of this anti "DEI" (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) is about, purging anyone who isn't a straight, able-bodied white male.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 24 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I see this in every thread. He was a felon when he was running. People voted for a felon. The American people wanted a criminal in the white house. The guy all previous generals who worked with him warned against. 77 million people are responsible for these firings, plus whatever many stayed home and didn't vote. His campaign promise was to replace everyone with loyalists.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

*besides white and orange

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So is this even legal? Are there seriously no checks and balances for this kinda stuff?

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

The own supreme Court, presidency, Congress and Senate majority. Which check and which balance do you prefer?

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 24 points 1 day ago

Dude, legality has lost all meaning.

[–] cashsky@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

Lol checks and balances is an illusion to keep the masses from revolting

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope the joint Chiefs already had plans in place as a contingency for this. Now is the time for a military coup. The sooner it's done, the less messy things will get

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every single member of the military I've talked to, somehow, for some reason seems to support Trump. I'm fucking stunned by it, but it seems he has their support.

[–] DarthKaren@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

it's about a 50/50 at my local base. The vets, on the other hand, tend to lean towards tRUmp. I have never gotten it either. Our regional congressman, or ex now, never did jack shit for us. We were a tool to get her elected every time. She didn't really do anything to help. When she left, what did they do? Idiots voted in another useless GOP.

When PACT was first shot down, I had to actually explain why that was a bad thing and that we needed it. They bought every last fake talking point. I had actually read the measure. Anyone that did had seen why it was a good thing.

We have a problem of propagation of fake news on bases. A lot of them show faux on the TVs in waiting areas. On top of that, it tends to be conservatives that join. Officers do tend to be less red. I really don't know what would happen if the military actually fulfilled its oath to protect against the domestic threat part of our oath.

It is disgusting hearing fellow vets with the "I got mine" attitude, or other attitudes that are directly against the nature of service. That isn't what we were serving for.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

Also, the "I got mine" group is about to lose all of what they got.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ryegye24@midwest.social 44 points 1 day ago

Remember a few months ago when Trump said he needed generals like Hitler had

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was just talking to a friend yesterday who mentioned that the conditions for China to invade Taiwan will be optimal in three weeks based on the ocean conditions and ship movements.

I said even if Trump wants to be the "president of peace" and avoid interfering, the generals wouldn't allow the inaction. I think my exact words were, "he would have to fire them all in the next two weeks."

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

One absolutely doesn't prepare such a large operation at such a short notice.

For an intelligence analyst, signs of an invasion are typically detectable 3 months ahead. If one performs a maritime invasion at a notice of weeks, failure is likely. (For reference, the D-Day needed years of planning and months of moving resources to work.)

Also, I trust that Taiwan has infiltrated China just as deeply as China has infiltrated Taiwan - they likely cannot keep massive secrets from each other.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

America is toast. Best we can hope for is a military coup. Military purge is in progress. At this point I think threatening to nuke Canada is the red line and only if prevailing winds are on my side.

Left and right are living in alternate realuties and this can only lead to violence. If the military chooses right then it's world war 3.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 135 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unprecedented? Not according to the playbook we're following to the fucking 't'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives

[–] underfreyja@lemmy.world 110 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's absolutely batshit insane that we can see this happening in real time and have direct references to the third reich.

Every fucking week they do something and we can just pull an article about how the Nazis did it first.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What gets me is that they're so lame doing it all. Like at least the nazi's had slick uniforms and admittedly well designed iconography. You guys (Americans) are going through a Nazification by a bunch of losers

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mean, I was listing a few examples out in another conversation, and just off the top of my head... and I'm no historian or anything - I'm sure there are similar lists orders of magnitude more detailed floating around the internet somewhere. Anywho:

1921 - The Sturmabteilung – More commonly known as the ‘brown shirts’, militant branch of the Nazi party, loyalists who used violence and intimidation against opposing parties and targeted populations. Today we have MAGA or ‘red hats’ who use the same tactics but in a less organized fashion (arguably groups like the ‘Proud Boys’ are a closer match, but those are all just smaller subsets of MAGA). A few recent key highlights were the Jan 6 insurrection and the caravan that ran a bus of Biden supporters off the road; and of course countless individual instances of targeted bigotry.

1923 – Speaking of Jan 6, that was the modern equivalent to the Beer Hall Putsch, which was also an unsuccessful attempt at an insurrection.

1924 – Hitler was sentenced to a 5 year prison sentence for his involvement in the Beer Hall Putsch, for which he only served 10 months; during that time he wrote his manifesto “Mein Kampf”. Our current president was recently convicted of 34 felonies, for which he faced zero consequences. Around that time, Project 2025 surfaced, which echoes many of Mein Kampf’s key points, most notably a disdain for democratic institutions and a call to restructure the government into a more authoritarian model made up of loyalists. Trump has also directly quoted Mein Kampf multiple times, and borrowed other language from Hitler like "Lügenpresse" (Lying Press) as "Fake News".

1926 - League of German Worker Youth, or “Hitler Youth” – heavy exploitation of teen impressionability, especially teen boys, to woe support from a young audience. Today there are youth groups for just about everything, but leveraging insecurities of young boys played a role in the recent election, with exit poles showing Gen Z males leaning disproportionately to Trump.

1929 – The Great Depression left pretty much the entire planet dreaming of a more economically secure future, which gave opposition parties to the status quo a major point to criticize those currently in power; the Nazis were no exception, and gained a lot of their support promising an improved economy. The modern world economies were recently all hamstrung by covid, and remain weakened, once again giving opposition parties something to blame on their opponents – costs of groceries, housing, etc are a huge part of why people justified support for Trump (and more broadly, a global shift toward authoritarianism).

1933 – Enabling Act of 1933 – The gist of this one is that Hitler used their existing legal framework to completely undermine and rewrite their legal framework. He put out a rapid slurry of legal decrees and took a grand total of 53 days to basically destroy their constitution and grant himself absolute power. Today, we’re seeing a similar rapid-fire of concerning legislation from Trump via his executive orders.

1933 – Hitler appointed Chancellor by German president Hindenburg. Hindenburg was in his mid-80s at the time of that appointment. Trump may be more of a Hitler’s-enabler figure than an actual-Hitler, but it doesn’t take long to spot a younger vocal appointee that’s been handed power without the say of voters: today’s actual-Hitler could be Elon Musk. *as I understand it, voting for a party then appointment to chancellor was pretty standard for the German govt at the time, so this was very much Germany's equivalent to Trump taking the majority vote.

1933 – Book Burnings – Basically material that didn’t align with Nazi ideals was made contraband. Today, we’ve seen a push to remove things like LGBT or civil rights content from public schools and libraries.

1934 – The Night of Long Knives – Purging of non-loyalists from government positions by execution. Today’s equivalent is happening right now, starting with the email that was sent to all federal employees essentially bribing them to resign, and threatening firing of those remaining as part of a restructuring of the federal workforce, and continuing with the gutting of non-loyalists from the military.

There's also the seeming never-ending list of examples of minorities who support Trump.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"The removal of the second Black man to serve as America’s most senior general and the first woman to" .....and there it is.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I genuinely hope racism and sexism are the primary motivations behind this because that's pretty much the best case scenario

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] towelie@lemm.ee 83 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

General Brown was abruptly dismissed as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on February 21, 2025 by President Donald Trump. Trump subsequently announced that Brown would be replaced with John D. Caine, who did not meet the legal prerequisites for the position, and who, according to Trump, had pledged "I love you, sir. I think you’re great, sir. I’ll kill for you, sir.", while wearing a MAGA hat.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If they don't meet the legal prerequisites, they don't get the job. dafuq!

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So a Conservative DEI hire?

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago

In a manner of speaking, yes. Should bring this up in c/conservative. We've already established that an unelected H1B immigrant from S. Africa is dismantling our government.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

Have you met this, or the previous trump administrations? The don't care about the law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 145 points 1 day ago (14 children)

This is an internal coup, there's no doubt about it. I'm not sure how the oligarchs are letting this happen. It's insane. Their regret will not make me happy.

[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

It's literally the oligarchs making it happen. Trump is not the main player here.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 73 points 1 day ago (7 children)

And so his purge of bipartisan and democratic leaders of the military allows him to ensconce lackeys that won’t question or refuse orders to invade other countries, like Canada.

People keep on saying that America won’t invade other countries, like Panama or Canada. THIS IS WHY THEY WILL BE ABLE TO DO SO.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 112 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Hey Americans if you were looking for a red line this should probably be it...

[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Too many Americans are still comfortable and have a job, food, shelter, etc. Things will probably change once all of these things kick into motion and cause huge recessions, but by that point it'll be too late. That's the paradox of prevention.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›