this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
219 points (99.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13687 readers
192 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 64 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They give the gun to the fascist and blame the marxist

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 52 points 3 weeks ago

Look what you made me do

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 50 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Clearly the fascist would only kill the anarchist and liberal because the Marxist is the same as him but just Red Fash, right?

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 43 points 3 weeks ago

The liberal would say this while giving the gun to the fascist

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually if history is anything to go by the liberal gives the gun to the fascist and the Marxist wrestles it away from the fascist, it goes off in the struggle shooting the liberal in the leg. The liberal screams and blames the marxist for this. The marxist manages to beat the fascist into submission, but the gun slides across the floor toward the liberal who picks it up and shoots the anarchist. Then the Liberal and Marxist spend the rest of their lives hating eachother, and the liberal also brings the fascist to the hospital and tells the cops the Marxist is the one who shot the anarchist, and their leg.

[–] muix@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I like how in every scenario the anarchist didn't do anything

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

They got shot thats something technically :p

[–] Mindfury@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago

certified gamergater from a lib instance moment

[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Shit many times they empty the chamber on the marxist themselves

liberals don't have the balls to kill anyone, it's uncivil

[–] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Right answer would be to kill the fascist & shoot himself

[–] trabpukcip@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago

A lib who :woody-guthrie-guitar: is cool with me

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But instead of just killing you, he gives you a long speech about how you made the right choice for the economy first, prolonging your torture.

[–] Bonescape@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

although i agree with the sentiment, i think a key part for this to work is missing, and thats the scale. the only reason the liberal gives the gun to the facist, is cause the bourgeoisie spend a lot of money on propaganda, making the liberals more scared of the left, and less scared of the right. if it's only 4 people there's a big chance these delusions (among others) planted in the liberal brains by the bourgeisie/facists will not be strong enough, and there will be another outcome Id like to imagine here the liberal pisses themselves and probably does nothing, since they have to make actual meaningful decisions on their own for once, and cant just roll along with whatever wind is blowing

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not propaganda, it's class interests

[–] splinter@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Liberal is a political philosophy, not a social class.

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Right, there are liberals who are liberals despite it going against their class interests, true.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

Attempted joke meant to suggest that the liberal would also betray some minority group.