this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13950 readers
707 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Any and all textual works can be decried as "lacking exigence", no matter their content.

  • Make vague references to "the canon". Do not explain what canon you're talking about.

  • Employ words like "ethic (singular)", "schema", "polity". It doesn't matter if you use them correctly, just use them.

  • Pick a noun or an adjective to use as a verb. Just give it your own definition and let the audience figure it out.

  • Use obtuse definitions of philosophical frameworks, like "it's about bodies moving through space". Do not elaborate or make it easier to tell what the fuck that's supposed to mean.

  • If someone is making a good argument that you don't like, say it's "reinforcing teleological norms" and refuse to engage with it any more.

  • And, of course, the classic: Anything you don't like is "deeply unserious".

~~thank u for coming to my ted talk~~

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey I'm pretty sure you're not allowed to roast me like this unprompted.

i-spil-my-jice mods mods mods!

Wait, shit, I am the mods.

[–] RION@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

akshually it's 70% a self-report and 30% things my college profs said that annoyed me

[–] T34_69@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And, of course, the classic: Anything you don't like is "deeply unserious".

This one is actually true though

[–] AndJusticeForAll@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Unserious response, try actually grappling with the ontology of the post next time.

[–] blight@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To a certain polity, the posting ethic is merely about posting-as-schema, and while it's clear that the author rudimentarily grasps the canon, I do think the contents of her discoursing is quite lacking exigence.

[–] RION@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"x-as-y" is a good one, forgot about that

[–] anaesidemus@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

peepee-as-poopoo

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The false dualism of the schema you have posited is imminent within it's own critique qua critique. The signifier “smarty-pants" is forever seeking its signified, its meaning always already deferred, failing to appear.

[–] StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are you quoting matrix reloaded at us

It's the best Matrix movie

[–] roux@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

When arguing, use "ergo" a lot to make sure people know you just made a point, even if you haven't made a point.

Also I actually used "schema" earlier today but I was explaining a bit of code for the blog logic for my web framework to my partner.

Who art thou, that spake of such balderdash?

A mere philistine in the good works and hands of the sciences they call "yapponomics"?

[–] Xx_Aru_xX@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not even going to try to do all of this like the other comments

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

how do I do the opposite of this? make insightful remarks or speak knowledgeably on a topic and growing closer to them instead of becoming alienated by the effort.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Type in lower case and use maoist standard english

[–] RION@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

silence earnest communicator. a sophist is speaking...

And speak concisely...

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Make sure to do everything you can to prevent electrical infetterence.