this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
191 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13822 readers
623 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trying to shame a group of people for simply existing is actually just vile and resentful hate and not a part of "civil debate"? Who woulda thunk it?

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nothx@hexbear.net 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Even if she was "debating" in good faith, there is no debate as to whether trans people exists... Fuck this soggy turd.

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no reason to use sexist insults however

[–] nothx@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re right, my apologies. I was riffing and didn’t stop to think enough about the connotations.

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Comment has been cleared for upbearing rat-salute-2

By Dios, she should be put to the wall and have the Mozambique drill tactic practiced upon 'er... again and again...

[–] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I recall correctly, most of her proclamations on gender were very final in tone. As in not open for discussion.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

Yeah she did that all the time. "Trans women are just men in drag and are probably sex predators" isn't exactly asking a question or engaging in a debate. Fuck her.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago

Henry Ford used to want to debate economics. Now he just writes screeds about the international jew.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does she not realize that she's acting exactly like the Dursleys she mocked before?

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From what I remember of the later books, it seems like her primary problem with the Dursleys just became that they were fat.

[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sean (the skull) has an unnecessarily long video where he goes through everything that sucks about Harry Potter basically

And yes, after listening to his extended list of examples it's hard to conclude otherwise.

There's a lot of stuff in those books that flew under the radar 20+years ago when I was reading them

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Ugh, I guess that explains why Draco Malfoy was redeemed at the last minute. He was essentially one of the Dursleys, but it was okay because he was written to be conventionally attractive.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sort of off-topic, but all of this reminds me of the time the UK media raised a stink about rightoids being called "gammons".

frothingfash: "Hey, the word gammon is elitist! Being a racist gammon is for the ugly poor people, so if you hate racism you hate poor people!"

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

sitting down to an exciting game of backremoved

[–] GVAGUY3@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

I was talking about how JKR is now with my Mom (who literally read a couple of the books out loud to me as a kid and we even went to the Deathly Hallows midnight release together) and she said JKR is like the Dursleys now.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Muggleborn steal magic, trans people steal femininity/masculinity, what is there to debate smuglord

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

Can't wait for the Harry Potter reboot where Voldemort's the good guy.

[–] whoreticulture@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

"Let's debate whether or not you can exist"

[–] TanneriusFromRome@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Hah, how wonderful! And how do they reply when you say you don't necessarily want them to die?"

"I don't say that."

shocked-pikachu

[–] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

JK out here like, “A toast to the troops. All the troops. Both sides.” Fair and balanced and feminist-pilled for real.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Chuds really like to virtue signal about "debate" and freeze-peach but it's really just a cover for legitimizing bigotry and fascism.

[–] Angel@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And if you refuse to entertain that shit, they'll go on about how they "owned" you, but in actuality, they're like:

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

Jowling Kowling Shit-Ass Fucking Rowling

[–] GVAGUY3@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Whenever I've seen people say who they would love to reeducate Puyi style, I would love to see her go be reformed into a proper socialist citizen.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Did she really change at all? Posey Galbraith comments within

[–] D61@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Debating Gender

Insulting Trans People

same-picture

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Do you think the dog is dead?