this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
151 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13823 readers
765 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know it's spelled "minute". That was a typo and I am not going to fix it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree with the overall sentiment, but the commute time needed to avoid theme park status is more variable. Like, a 30 minute commute would be well under average for NYC and that’s not a theme park (outside of Times Square).

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hot take but unfortunately most of Manhattan below 59th is a theme park these days.

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To an extent, it’s an inevitability when you’re talking about a tourism heavy city plus large swaths that exist almost entirely for day job commuters. But that also means that the white collar worker coming in from New Jersey often has a longer commute than the service worker coming in from low income housing in the outer boroughs so the dynamic isn’t always the same as what the tweet is getting at.

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah broadly I think your point is still correct.

[–] Grandpa_garbagio@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Philly has neighborhoods that are theme park, but a few blocks over the real estates cheaper and that's where the workers live.

[–] edge@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ideally the workers would live in a 15 minute range of their job as well. They should be able to walk to work the same way you can walk there to get a coffee.