this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024

120 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13822 readers

623 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

context@hexbear.net

Infamousblt@hexbear.net

Sulvy@hexbear.net

120

So how big is this thing at the border? (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 year ago by AOCapitulator@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

186 comments fedilink hide all child comments

6 states siding against a supreme court decision to deny access to federal authorities seems big, if thats happened in my lifetime I've not heard of it before

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

If they really thought like this they would have made sure Bernie won so that they could buy themselves more time before worsening material conditions radicalize people.

Objectively that would be better for the survival of capital than leaning harder into neoliberal austerity

This is not a rational system making careful decisions