this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
472 points (96.3% liked)

politics

20394 readers
3054 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crsu@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The media has a boner for this happening

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (6 children)

They give it so much oxygen and also never fully call out how crazy shit is. It's all understatement when it comes to conservatives' behavior and plans and then they over hype any minor issue the progressives have. Looking at you, NY Times...

Don't these media outlets understand they will be among the first to get thrown into prison camps when conservative dictatorship and revenge is in full swing?

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't these media outlets understand they will be among the first to get thrown into prison camps when conservative dictatorship and revenge is in full swing?

Ahahahahahahahahahahaha

"Most of the ads are not about issues. They're sort of like the debates," Moonves said, noting, "[t]here's a lot of money in the marketplace."

The 2016 campaign is a "circus," he remarked, but "Donald's place in this election is a good thing." "Man, who would have expected the ride we're all having right now? ... The money's rolling in and this is fun," Moonves went on. "I've never seen anything like this, and this going to be a very good year for us. Sorry. It's a terrible thing to say. But, bring it on, Donald. Keep going.”

  • CBS CEO

They cannot look beyond the money and their narcissism tells them their money will outlast the fascistic rise they helped to foment. Same reason the billionaires are building their bunkers. They believe they can remain safe via their money

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

These media outlets basically created Trump's brand, and "bOtH siDeS" absolutely because it wasn't conservative news media clips the alt-right were gleefully consuming in 2016, it was compilations of liberal news anchors with "shocked" expressions reciting the latest Trump tweets. Can't believe it's still happening but we're back to Trump outrage news cycles and online reactions to it just like 2016.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Even if the fascists go all-out against the media companies, the CEOs steering these decisions won't care - they've all got millions and millions of dollars, and they'll have enough lead time to simply hop on their luxury private jet and fly away from any looming danger.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Worth remembering when this comes up that this has been exacerbated recently by leadership changes at the times. They hired some fox fuck heads with the intent to both sides the country into a dictatorship.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn. CNN had a similar change relating to new leadership. If not to damage CNN and other traditional news sources, what are they even trying to accomplish? It's not like conservatives are coming back to replace the progressive viewers who were pushed away. The result is less revenue for CNN; less revenue for NYT...

But maybe that's the point like with Twitter. They "invest" the purchase price so they can kill the network or ruin its credibility to remove the contrast between the nonsense on Fox, OAN, etc and previously respected organizations.

Plus all the local news stations are being quietly bought by larger organizations with the same intentions if not worse.

Good faith journalism has been experiencing a hostile takeover, and it's speeding up.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Short-term profits vs. Long-term consequences.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't these media outlets understand they will be among the first to get thrown into prison camps when conservative dictatorship and revenge is in full swing?

Ahahahahahahahahahahaha

"Most of the ads are not about issues. They're sort of like the debates," Moonves said, noting, "[t]here's a lot of money in the marketplace."

The 2016 campaign is a "circus," he remarked, but "Donald's place in this election is a good thing." "Man, who would have expected the ride we're all having right now? ... The money's rolling in and this is fun," Moonves went on. "I've never seen anything like this, and this going to be a very good year for us. Sorry. It's a terrible thing to say. But, bring it on, Donald. Keep going.”

They cannot look beyond the money and their narcissism tells them their money will outlast the fascistic rise they helped to foment. Same reason the billionaires are building their bunkers. They believe they can remain safe via their money

[–] Crismus@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Sadly, billionaires seem to forget that their security will be enjoying their bunkers a lot longer than they will.

They won't be on top during the post-apocalypse.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They're out of things to rage about, and clicks and ad revenue probably dropped significantly since Trump's been gone. They want Trump back in office, he was good for business.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'd only get thrown in jail if they weren't willing to bend over for the new regime, and they've already shown that they're very willing to do that.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Some key people are very much at risk, no matter how compliant they are. Donnie diapers holds grudges, man, and so do his crazy, unhinged base of teabaggers. Some of them are still outraged that the press found out about Watergate. And Iran/Contra.

People in Big Tech that push for donnie are also at risk, too. The unhinged teabaggers think all of Big Tech is fill with commie liberals out to "censor" them.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think they realize they need to consider if they prefer clicks over a free press.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They will be some of the first victims. And they don't even seem to know it.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

More and more it’s clear that they are in it in for the clicks and not the reporting.

[–] catbaba@lemmus.org 2 points 1 year ago

How is this even real?