this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
68 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13687 readers
192 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Our demands

  1. ~~Return the site’s moderation practice to it’s former, libs-banned-on-site glory.~~ Move forward to a new, glorious form of banning theory inspired by TC69 thought, while learning from it’s mistakes, and listening to neurodivergent comrades
  2. Reinvigorate the heart of this site’s community, c/furry
  3. Remove r*ddit karma
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] milistanaccount09@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You can check her pronouns right there through the link. There's no excuse to misgender hir.

[–] Cummunism@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

isnt "they" is what people use when they don't know the gender? I use it all the time in help desk tickets since many names i couldn't guess the gender. ive been on this site too much and never seen someone be miffed about using "they."

[–] YearOfTheCommieDesktop@hexbear.net 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yeah but it also becomes the liberal's version of misgendering for people who don't 100% pass or who a lib just wants to be shitty to. It's simply misgendering but with plausible deniability in many cases, so people on here (where basically everyone has pronouns listed) get a little touchy about it since there's kinda no excuse at that point

[–] Cummunism@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

yes, how dare that person(who commented above) not click the profile link and check out what a long inactive and once problematic admin preferred, instead of defaulting to "i don't know." What an egregious crime.

Let's not be a parody of ourselves. It's important to read a persons intent and not just their words.(which sounds like me being a lib, but it's the internet. youre reading words without any tone or emotion so you have to process it differently)

[–] YearOfTheCommieDesktop@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Good thing I didn't say that shrug-outta-hecks

I'm not saying crucify them, geez, I'm just explaining why it's sometimes touchy despite generally being "the default when you don't know". That user is talking about how they were around at the time and knew her/were driven away by her, so idk, it's not 100% unreasonable, esp considering gender figures heavily in her username, but it's also almost certainly a misunderstanding. Still, no reason to be hostile to a minor correction either. It's fine.

[–] Cummunism@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

lotta liberals out there using "they" in an aggressive way? sure if you say so. In my experience liberals arent smart enough to know how to use the word "they" properly.

[–] TankieCatgirl@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago

I've had it done to me before I started using she/they with the intent of refusing to accept that I'm a "real woman". It tends to be used as a way to refuse to use someone's correct pronouns, and instead handwave their identity as unimportant, but the lib still gets to feel progressive. Imo it's only proper to use they/them as a default when you have no way of knowing someone's pronouns.

It's a Thing, yeah, idk what to tell you

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

oh it absolutely happens. i know a dude who self-ids as strictly gay but is dating a pre-everything trans woman and exclusively refers to her with they/them pronouns. just as a fun example.

just bc you haven't encountered a behavior doesn't make it imaginary, and this one is harmful to trans people.

[–] raven@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

The addition of the "and once problematic" bit makes it sound like you're suggesting that she deserves to be misgendered some amount because you don't respect her. I don't expect that's what you meant but you might want to change that wording.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Its just a gender neutral pronoun. Its fine.

[–] Cummunism@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

i didnt think i was crazy there. plus she was responding to Infamousblt, a 3 year user. So im gonna go ahead and doubt that person is some awful transphobe. I guess milistanaccount09 also should have also checked a profile huh?

[–] D61@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

I dunno, if this were some long in depth conversation about another person, sure. We could do more diligence and stuff but this isn't one of those conversations so it seems okay to use more generic pronouns should be acceptible.

Maybe it helps one of the last conversations I had with them before their final logout was after a book club reading of Trans Liberation: Beyond Pink or Blue and they were feeling that they might be a bit more fluid than they had previously thought.