this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
91 points (93.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13950 readers
695 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah my bad. I think we actually agree on a lot and I'm just not coming across well. This place makes me feel dumb and sometimes I don't feel welcome here.

[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fair, the core of my confusion is I am unable to draw the line used as argument against theory.

I am genuinely confused what about it you're trying to say is wrong about the theory. I used the Mao example earlier because it's an example of someone doing the type of explanation I thought would generally help others here understand your position better.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago

I need to be more clear. I'm not anti-theory and I am not pushing a specific criticism of any theory. What I am trying to say is that I get frustrated at people dunking on electoralism, implying the alternative is this kind of book club leftist that we have seen for decades.

I'm cautiously optimistic. Yeah I get politicians tend to co-opt talking points and then turn out to be different. But that's not everyone and I know there are good people out there who aren't going to AOC us. Maybe Zohran is a good one? Maybe he is another AOC?

Instead of endlessing banging that drum of caution can we find some constructive ways to handle that potential situation?