this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
92 points (93.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13954 readers
821 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
92
AOC's Been Doing This For Years. Zohran Will Too. You Fell For It Again (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 week ago by AYJANIBRAHIMOV@lemmygrad.ml to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
130 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My bad, I rounded 157 years to "nearly 200". Can we not do the debate nerd thing and talk about substance rather than nitpicking a date a book was published?

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you're not gonna take your own argument seriously, why should I? The difference between 200 and 157 is the same difference between today and Martin Luther King's assassination, quite alot of history in between

and talk about substance

WHAT SUBSTANCE LMAO?!?! You haven't mentioned a single example of theory, you're so vague you're literally jumping centuries