this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
809 points (84.5% liked)

Political Memes

9016 readers
1891 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 56 points 1 week ago (5 children)

“I was headed right for the tree, but I didn’t slam on my brakes because they make a squeaking sound. I’m paralyzed now, but at least I didn’t have to listen to that damn squeak! See how much better a person I am than you because of my resolve?“

These people…

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 6 days ago

Me: "I slammed the brakes. I was on the way to a peaceful Tesla protest."

Them: "How dare you press the brakes when cars are destroying the environment, you genocide apologist! You're wasting your time, if you do not burn down a Tesla dealership you are morally repugnant you fascist supporter."

It's the "violent" nature of the protest and name calling that have turned me off from them. Not necessarily the content of their words. But also, like yes I believe in recycling even though we have bigger problems.

[–] ronanfahy@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Is the squeaking sound in your analogy the genocide of Palestinians?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

No, because the squeaking sound would still happen in the case of the crash if it was.

You didn't avert Palestinian genocide by murdering other minorities. You literally opted to make it worse. Congratulations. The hundreds of thousands of additional dead and displaced Palestinians thank you for your concern.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com -1 points 6 days ago

[nearly-supernatural level of eyeroll]

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I feel like a lot of people are doubling down now because the Democrats on the one hand show utter incompetence and unwillingness to fight Fascism in the US and on the other hand keep up their support for Fascism and genocide by Israel.

Everyone understands in their subconcious but many deny in their conciousness that things will not get better without a struggle. So going down the "i did harm reduction, you were all wrong, lalalala" route makes them feel like they did something and helps to not come to terms that they have been strung along by the Democrats for all those years.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Talk about careful wording lol. Very well done.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Better light myself on fire! That'll show those Dems!

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, the cognitive dissonance is astounding. As are the consequences.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

"we deserve non-squeaky brakes, and I won't use the squeaky ones!"

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The analogy does not hold up when change can be affected by the individual.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In a pluralistic society, individuals are rarely responsible for any measure of “change“. While we may venerate- and even idolize - such memorable figures in our history, and rightly so, the vast majority of change is both slow and takes place because of the concerted effort of a large amount of people who don’t really take any credit for it.

So, while your statement is, technically, correct, it doesn’t account for how such things typically come to pass. In other words, what you said makes sense logically, but practically, that logic plays a very small role in the reality of the situation because most people act illogically.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Sure, I could have voted against murdering everyone in the bus, but I'm only one person, so what's the point?" isn't exactly the position I would expect. Or, for that matter, respect.

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Was this responding to my comment because I don't see any logical connection?

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com -1 points 1 week ago

Hardly surprising

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The analogy is of stopping a vehicle by hitting the brakes.

You object that one individual has all the control in the situation.

I point out that if it the brakes were only hit by a vote of everyone in the vehicle, it wouldn't be less vile to abstain from voting than it would be to abstain from hitting the fucking brakes.

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I object that you oversimplify to gross misrepresentation.