this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13937 readers
668 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The 1964 Harlem Riot was one of a number of race-based uprisings/ protests that took place in multiple cities across the United States during the 1960s. As elsewhere Harlem blacks reacted to racial discrimination, segregation, police brutality and social injustices that dominated their lives. They resorted to violence to express their disgust with the system.

Ironically the Harlem Riot occurred just two weeks after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson. The act, which outlawing discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, and nationality, was the most sweeping measure ever adopted by the nation to guarantee racial justice. The irony lies in the fact that while the Civil Rights Act made it illegal to discriminate against a U.S. citizen based on race or color, the discriminatory socioeconomic systems and structures long in place in the nation did not change with this new law.

The Harlem uprising began on July 16, 1964 when 15-year-old James Powell was shot and killed by white off-duty police Lieutenant Thomas Gilligan. The Harlem community was infuriated by the murder which it viewed as an unnecessary example of police brutality. Many Harlemites were convinced that Officer Gilligan, a war veteran and experienced police officer, could have found a way to arrest and subdue Powell without using deadly force.

The first two days following the shooting saw peaceful protesting in Harlem and other areas of New York City, New York. However, on July 18, some of the protesters went to the Harlem Police Station, calling for the resignation or termination of Officer Gilligan. Police officers were on guard outside the building, and as tensions grew, some in the crowd began throwing bricks, bottles, and rocks at the officers who waded into the crowd using their nightsticks. When word of the confrontation spread rioting ensued first in Harlem and then spread into Bedford-Stuyvesant, the black and Puerto Rican section of Brooklyn.

The race riot in the two boroughs of New York City lasted six days. It included breaking windows, looting, vandalism, and setting a variety of local businesses on fire. When the rebellion ended on July 22, one black resident was killed. There were more than 100 injuries, 450 arrests, and around $1 million in property damage.

The Harlem uprising was the beginning of a series of violent confrontations with police in more than a dozen cities throughout the North including Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the New Jersey cities of Jersey City, Paterson, and Elizabeth; as well as Chicago (Dixmoor) Illinois, making it the most violent in terms of urban rioting since 1919. These rebellions as well as civil rights protests mainly in the South, helped designate the summer of 1964 as the Long, Hot Summer.

from blackpast

reminders:

  • πŸ’š You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • πŸ’™ Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • πŸ’œ Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🐢 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I've got a friend who tends to be very opinionated and judgemental (and has very good memory!) and she will not forgive me for the sin of consulting critics/reviews regarding movies. (Rlm in this case but the specific critic doesn't matter)

Like in the past I've decided not to see a film because a critic says it's dogshit and she brings it up as if it's some lapse of personal integrity on my part. The number of films I've heard of because of critics then watched and thoroughly enjoyed far outweighs the number skipped but this is apparently not to my credit as I was simply "given" the opinion that they're good movies πŸ™„

I like to consume all media critically, cultivate my taste over time, learn about what I'm in engaging in. There's too much out there to see/play/read so I gotta pick and choose somehow!

Anyway I'm sick of her weird moralizing and decided I need to tell her to step off but didn't find the right moment last time.

I'd be less indignant if she had good taste but she likes literally everything and if there's a work she doesn't like it's only because the creator did something awful, not something about the work itself. (Did you know Jackie Chan is a sexist asshole?)

Do you have any thoughts on critics/reviews or have you encountered similar attitudes?

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

so she just doesn't accept film criticism as useful at all? lol

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

shrug-outta-hecks if i'm going by myself, i do watch (appropriate) reviewer. i liked some critic takes for non-obvious kino, for obvious slop just rotten tomatoes rating is enuff (the dogshit level is low though, around 45 is unwatchable territory). But tbh going with friend is different, arguing about movies you just watched is basically the reason you go, why ruin it. (but i haven't gone to movies since covid, just pirating old stuff)

going to see last jedi with friends was chefs-kiss for compare and constrast before and after people ingest takes

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago

Very over the top thing for her to be upset over. In my live experience, friends like this never last long.

I'm wondering if her parents are posh. Seems like something a materially comfortable person would do.