this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
1114 points (93.9% liked)

Fuck AI

3397 readers
839 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Personally dont think that's a good comparison. I would say it's more like taking a photo and claiming you know how to paint. You're still actually cre a ting something, but using a digital tool that does it for you. You chose the subject and fiddle with setting to get a better image closer to what you want and then can take it into software to edit it further.

Its art in its own right, but you shouldn't directly compare it to painting.

[–] Carrot@lemmy.today 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Even that is a bad analogy, it's like commissioning a painter to paint something for you, and then claiming you know how to paint. You told an entity that knows how to do stuff what you wanted, and it gave it to you. Sure, you can ask for tweaks here and there, but in terms of artistic knowledge, you didn't need any and didn't provide any, and you didn't really directly create anything. Taking a decent photo requires more knowledge than generating something on ChatGPT. Not to mention actually being in front of the thing you want a photo of.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think my analogy is more accurate

[–] Carrot@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Care to explain? I think your analogy gives the credit of art creation to someone who didn't create art, and thus is flawed.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean i think i explained myself quite well already, and not to be insulting to you, but i dont think you're willing to accept any argument i would make that goes against what you already beleive, since your argument against it simply you asserting your own beliefs (that AI art isnt art) as an immutable fact

[–] Carrot@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I'm not saying AI art isn't art. It is. I'm just saying that the person writing the prompt didn't create it, or do anything remotely skilled or artistic to get the result.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

Okay, but if theyre the one writing the prompt, changing parameters and pressing the button to generate it how are they not the one creating it?

And i do think photography is pretty analogous here. Anyone can point a phone camera st something, hit one button and generate something. It takes no skill or artistic talent to do so and the phone is whats doing all the work, but its still creating art. And just like AI, people can put more effort into it, coming up with a creative subject, fine tuning different setting to get the effects they want, or even using different devices/models to get different images, and retaking it multiple times to get something theyre happy with, then touching it up in editing software.