Selfhosted

49204 readers

554 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

466

Let’s Encrypt Begins Supporting IP Address Certificates (linuxiac.com)

submitted 1 day ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Who benefits from this? Even though Let’s Encrypt stresses that most site operators will do fine sticking with ordinary domain certificates, there are still scenarios where a numeric identifier is the only practical choice:

Infrastructure services such as DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) – where clients may pin a literal IP address for performance or censorship-evasion reasons.
IoT and home-lab devices – think network-attached storage boxes, for example, living behind static WAN addresses.
Ephemeral cloud workloads – short-lived back-end servers that spin up with public IPs faster than DNS records can propagate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The down votes are from people who work in IT support that have to deal with idiots that play with things they dont understand.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s unfortunate they don’t know what /s means

[–] spongeborgcubepants@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It obviously means "secure"

[–] fatalicus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

We do, it's just that those users will also often go "nah, I'm just joking!" then do some shit anyways.

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

nah, I was once an idiot who didn't understand so idgaf

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, the unfortunate part about internet security is that everyone has to start somewhere. And that means there’s always a newbie making dumb mistakes that they don’t even realize are dumb. It’s not a personal failing, unless they fail to learn from it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

How do I setup a reverse proxy for pure TCP? /s

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

You can based on the port.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

It's called buying more static IPs and making your ISP deal with it haha

[–] Laser@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago

Think that's called NATing