HybridSarcasm

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Well, it is the Register

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

In the context of this community and the movement in general, ‘self-hosting’ is designed to contrast against the larger trend of “let me just trust one of the big cloud companies with all my stuff”. We’ve seen how that can go very, very wrong. So, the idea of maintaining control of your data and the methods by which it is accessed is the heart of ‘self-hosting’. It’s not meant to restrict one to only computers stored in one’s home.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Make sure your home server config isn’t mistaking this client as a remote user. Check your networking, etc

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, WWE has two of EVERYTHING, despite having a smaller women’s roster than the men’s. AEW has tag titles, triples titles, 4 men’s titles, 2 women’s title.

I’m sure the stories you are thinking of are well-told, but there are so many belts! Why does AEW need a second world title? It doesn’t work well in WWE. Why would it work in AEW?

I suppose my question is more about how the companies perceive the viewership/audience. Do we give them the impression that we need more belts to care more about their product?

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Has wrestling really devolved such that the story doesn’t matter unless a belt is involved? Seems that way.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

This is a joke, right?

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Del Rio is the real reason, right?

9
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world to c/squaredcircle@lemmy.zip
 

Can you use this phrase and NOT be a heel? Seems not.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1147109

As is stated in the title, I created and moderated !prolife@lemmy.world. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn't show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn't necessarily be everyone's cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.

EDIT

After making my case via email to info@lemmy.world, I received the following response:

"We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I'm sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs."

This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state "we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules".

 

As is stated in the title, I created and moderated !prolife@lemmy.world. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn't show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn't necessarily be everyone's cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.

EDIT

After making my case via email to info@lemmy.world, I received the following response:

"We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I'm sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs."

This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state "we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules".

view more: next ›