this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
742 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

15546 readers
3058 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Welcome to the field of engineering! Your first lesson will be; "Tolerances and you"!

[–] lnxtx 48 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] TheTurner@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

As a calibration technician, this makes me hurt. Lol.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it fits, great! If it doesn't, you didn't use enough tape.

[–] Fillicia@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

A failed inspection is just an invitation to use a different method until it passes.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

Cringes in Monte Carlo.

[–] nomecks@lemmy.wtf 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Never, in any engineering field, have I EVER seen anyone simplify pi to 5. For that matter, I have never seen anyone simplify to 3. It is always 3.14. I feel like pi simplification is a weird meme that people think engineers do but is never practiced anywhere.

It's like if there was a meme about chefs saying they always replace eggs with grapefruit. No they don't, and it's nonsense to think they do.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's less and less reason to do it (and it's never 5). On systems without floating point you might want to round it a bit, but only if the specific thing you're doing allows it, and even then you're more likely to do a fixed-point approach by using e.g. 314 and dividing by 100 later, or adjusting that value a bit so you can divide by 128 via bitshift if you're on a chip where division is expensive. However, in 2025 you almost certainly should have picked a chip with an FPU if you're doing trigonometry.

And while rounding pi to 3 or 4 is certainly just a meme, there are other approximations which are used, like small-angle approximations, where things like sin(x) can be simplified to just x for a sufficiently small x.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 11 points 2 days ago

For back-of-the-envelope or mental calculations, pi is often 3 or 10^(1/2).

The latter is better than 1% accurate, and has nice properties when doing order-of-magnitude/log space calculations in base 10.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's a lot of weird stereotypes out there that make no sense. Like the whole "programmers wear thigh high socks" thing. Where did that even come from?

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Bet that one was started by all those dastardly programmers that wear knee high socks!

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you've never seen anybody simplify it to 3 when doing head calcs without a phone nearby?

it doesn't happen often, in fact I've seen it once. in a decade.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The only time you should be doing head calcs as an engineer is to double check that you have a reasonable answer with the actual calcs on your actual calculator.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago

Second lesson: Pi is around 3.